More than any pages, I have now read the model's thinking.
It itself is like a one-page James Bond book: collecting clues from code, finding evidence, referring to past cases (code), and writing a comprehensive findings report.
You are fool if you think you can take out profits from stock market.
No patterns works, no support no resistance works, no candle analysis works when someone at the top is directly controlling it.
If someone says their prediction is spot on it could be because one of the 2 reasons.
1. They have the insider news.
2. They are faking.
Why isn't the practice of maintaining a thread pool followed here? I mean, that's the basics for dealing with the DB.
Who can afford the latency added by creating a new DB connection every time? And this way you can't even horizontally scale your service and still expect the DB to handle that many connections.
Tried so many prompts, threatened the model to bring its best, used flagship models, gave it Steve Jobs' philosophy, Apple's product philosophy, still didn't get a single satisfactory design.
I work with designers daily. There's always a WOW reaction when I see their work. That reaction is still far, far away with AI.
The outputs might be good enough to launch a website, maybe up to the MVP phase, but beyond that you need brand philosophy, identity, and consistency. AI just isn't able to do it yet.
Every day we see new tools, plugins, and products being launched. It already feels like overselling.
Models aren't yet capable of truly human-like tasks, yet they're being portrayed as if we're inches away from AGI. A trap, and sad that everyone is falling for it.
People have invested so much money in AI. Such big bets shouldn't have been taken, at least not this early. This overselling and hype feels more like a money-recovery path after knowing the real limits of current models.
You think models are good with text, try asking a model to generate a human like text once. I have never got an satisfactory output. Started hating the perfection now.
You think AI is helping with automation, reality is we are just trying to avoid writing those if-else conditions by ourselves.
TLDR;
A simple text generation model can never design websites, maintain servers, innovate and it can never have creativity.
Currently we are figuring out how to manage analytics in-house for around 100M events a month.
From the outside, analytics looks simple. Track events, store them, query them. But when you actually sit down to build or even evaluate it at scale, reality hits differently.
PostHog is there. Good product. But self-hosting it at our scale needs a big machine and serious infra. Paid tools are convenient, but expensive at scale. Some cheaper options exist, but they do not give us the kind of per-user tracking we need to create business funnels.
As a bootstrapped company, you cannot just say, “Let’s buy this tool.” You have to ask:
- Do we really need everything it offers?
- Can we build only the limited parts we actually need?
- Can we keep the storage cheaper?
- Can we work with a TTL of 1–2 years instead of keeping everything forever?
Reading. Discussing. Trying. Failing. Reworking. Learning again. A lot of people think bootstrapped companies move slower because they spend too much time thinking about cost.
I think the opposite.
- Cost makes you think deeper.
- It forces you to understand the system properly.
- It pushes you to separate what is essential from what is just nice to have.
We are still figuring it out. All of us are learning on the go. But that is also the beauty of building this way.
When you cannot throw money at every problem because you don't have enough, you learn to trade-off.
Glad that we took a call to build a end to end prep platform, instead of a typical course platform hosted on some third party site.