jurídico hanni pham retweetledi
ser contra lei que pune misoginia, racismo e homofobia é um indicador muito forte de que a pessoa tem que ser banida da sociedade e ir viver na selva ou no fundo do mar
Português
jurídico hanni pham
2.3K posts
jurídico hanni pham
@lontrapham
namorado e advogado da hanni (defensor do njz)
ditto Katılım Mayıs 2025
150 Takip Edilen138 Takipçiler
jurídico hanni pham retweetledi
@Galilee7664 @PoppyKPoppie In other words, even if they won, it wouldn't affect the MHJ case, but the MHJ case exposed important things that can and probably will be used by Danielle's defense.
Sorry for the long text, but I needed to explain both cases so you understand my point 😁
English
@Galilee7664 @PoppyKPoppie In the case of validation, the girls would have to prove that the dismissal of all employees and management would be detrimental; in other words, old Ador versus new Ador. However, the judge decided that there was no difference and the new management was competent. +
English
jurídico hanni pham retweetledi
if i’m being completely honest, this lawsuit does not read like ador terminated danielle bcoz it had a strong, clean, evidence-backed case ready to go. it reads like ador-hybe that wanted her out first, and assumed it could justify it later... (btw, we're technically in the "later" phase and they still don't have anything to show)
and why would they do that? bcoz danielle staying aligned with the others and especially with mhj’s position that all five should remain together is a problem structurally, not just contractually...
tl;dr all ador wants is to break ot5. they did that by kicking danielle out but now they need to prove to the court why she had to be kicked out. and its def an ador problem rn.
English
@sailorcarino Segundo os advogados coreanos, sim, pois seria considerado uma quebra de confiança da empresa, só que as outras meninas teriam que entrar em outro processo e iria começar tudo de novo, então acho que elas não vão querer mais dor de cabeça
Português
@lontrapham então tipo, se tiver tudo ao favor da dani ela sair vencedora, o new jeans pode recendi o contrato ou a ador vai ser obrigada a receber ela de volta no grupo ?
Português
Em resumo
Ador não reunio nem apresento provas
Audiência marcada para o Dia 14/05 e dia 02/07
Ador fala que um acordo pode existir
A defesa da Danielle afirmo que a Dani queria voltar mas a ador não deu ouvidos e processo ela
Português
@twiceasoty @breadjeanies Então é isso mesmo existe a possibilidade agora se é bom isso eu já não sei
Português
@lontrapham @breadjeanies eu vi isso por isso perguntei fiquei mt com essa duvida na cabeca pensando sera
Português
@twiceasoty @breadjeanies Pior que tem a ador já falo que existe essa possibilidade e os advogados da Dani falaram que ela estava disposta a voltar mas eles processaram sem falar com ela
Português
@breadjeanies Debatem os acontecimentos e chama testemunhas se houver provavelmente só vamos ter uma visão melhor do caso em julho se não tiver um acordo entre eles
Português
@breadjeanies Não é exatamente uma audiência é uma preparação onde o juiz ouve um pouco ambas as partes e alinha direito para tentar entender o caso e descobri se pode haver algum tipo de acordo como não rolo hoje ele marco uma data para audiência de verdade onde eles apresentam as provas+
Português
A ador acha que a Danielle é burra kkkkkk
.@TokkiLoops
ADOR: Danielle’s side keeps linking her entertainment activities to this lawsuit, but this is a damages and penalty case. Her ability to work as an entertainer is not determined by this lawsuit. She is free to resume activities if she chooses. Danielle's lawyer: If Danielle resumes activities, ADOR will inevitably raise objections and create further disputes.
Português
Uma coisa bem interessante a Ador não quis negociar a volta da Danielle eles já planejavam isso por tanto que a defesa foi clara
"Já havíamos manifestado nossa intenção de retornar após a sentença mas apesar disso, o autor impôs centenas de bilhões de won em multas"
1tokki@juantokki
[English Translation] Defendant: Danielle is an idol. If this case drags on, it becomes a critical weakness for her. The plaintiff, being an entertainment agency, would know this even better. Therefore, it appears that the plaintiff is trying to prolong the case. The defendant requests that this matter be resolved quickly. The plaintiff should have been prepared from the moment they initiated this case. The plaintiff continues to argue that another preparatory hearing should be scheduled or that a later date should be set. The defendant believes the plaintiff should already have evidence, and therefore is requesting consecutive hearing dates in April, May, and June to resolve the case quickly. According to the judge, the issue regarding the independent party is expected to be resolved before the next hearing in April (either dismissed or allowed to participate). The next hearing dates were set: •May 14 at 3:10 PM •July 2 at 3:10 PM Judge: Is there any possibility of settlement? Plaintiff: We cannot say there is absolutely none. Defendant: We already expressed that we would return after the ruling, but despite that, the plaintiff imposed hundreds of billions of won in penalties and proceeded with litigation. There was originally an intention to settle, but the plaintiff did not accept it. Plaintiff: We will follow the court’s procedural direction for how the case proceeds. Defendant: It seems further discussions are needed.
Português
@juantokki There's a very good chance the ador will realize she's not going to win this and propose putting her back in the group.
English
[English Translation]
Defendant:
Danielle is an idol. If this case drags on, it becomes a critical weakness for her. The plaintiff, being an entertainment agency, would know this even better. Therefore, it appears that the plaintiff is trying to prolong the case. The defendant requests that this matter be resolved quickly. The plaintiff should have been prepared from the moment they initiated this case.
The plaintiff continues to argue that another preparatory hearing should be scheduled or that a later date should be set.
The defendant believes the plaintiff should already have evidence, and therefore is requesting consecutive hearing dates in April, May, and June to resolve the case quickly.
According to the judge, the issue regarding the independent party is expected to be resolved before the next hearing in April (either dismissed or allowed to participate).
The next hearing dates were set:
•May 14 at 3:10 PM
•July 2 at 3:10 PM
Judge:
Is there any possibility of settlement?
Plaintiff:
We cannot say there is absolutely none.
Defendant:
We already expressed that we would return after the ruling, but despite that, the plaintiff imposed hundreds of billions of won in penalties and proceeded with litigation. There was originally an intention to settle, but the plaintiff did not accept it.
Plaintiff:
We will follow the court’s procedural direction for how the case proceeds.
Defendant:
It seems further discussions are needed.
토끼리@leeetokki
피고 다니엘은 아이돌입니다 이 사건이 장기화되면 치명적인 약점이 됨 원고인 기획사가 이를 더 잘 알것 그러므로 원고가 이 사건을 길게 끌고가려는 것을 드러낸다고 봄 이 사건을 신속히 해결해주십사 원고가 이 사건을 시작할때부터 준비가 되어 있었어야함
English
Dia 14/05 e dia 02/07 vai ser as próximas audiência ambas seram as 3:10 da manhã
PoppyKPoppie@PoppyKPoppie
the hearing dates have been set for 5/14 and 7/2, both at 3:10 pm.
Português
jurídico hanni pham retweetledi
the hearing dates have been set for 5/14 and 7/2, both at 3:10 pm.
토끼리@leeetokki
5/14, 7/2 각 3:10 로 기일 잡혔습니다
English