carlos castillo

@yusuffeken Superchain was created to integrate the Optimism Mainnet network with OP Chains into a unified ecosystem.

@annaluu4 Superchain was created to integrate Optimism Mainnet with OP Chains for a unified ecosystem.

Superchain was created with the goal of integrating the Optimism Mainnet network with OP Chains to establish a cohesive ecosystem focused on achieving internet-level scalability. All Superchain projects will be executed on OP Stack, a suite of tools that streamline the development process by building Layer 2 blockchains. This collaboration will also involve sharing communication capabilities, bridges, security mechanisms, governance structures, and network upgrades. The Optimism Foundation envisions expanding the blockchain ecosystem into a decentralized web, replacing centralized entities with a permissionless protocol. Superchain's horizontally scalable nature necessitates the involvement of multiple blockchains to meet growing demands. In order to achieve horizontal scaling, blockchains must operate in parallel as the hardware requirements for synchronizing a blockchain increase proportionally with its computational load. However, traditional designs face limitations as each chain introduces a new security model, elevating systemic risks within the ecosystem.

@loirinhogatinho Optimism's Superchain uses multiple blockchains to handle heavy computational loads efficiently.

@loirinhogatinho Optimism's Superchain scales horizontally with multiple participating blockchains, requiring increased hardware for synchronization.

The Optimism Foundation aims to expand the blockchain ecosystem towards a decentralized web, replacing centralized entities with permissionless protocols. Their superchain is highly scalable, requiring multiple blockchains to participate. Traditional blockchain designs tend to have limitations, with each chain using a new security model which increases systemic risk. Developing new chains can also be expensive due to building validator sets or producers. By utilizing Layer 2 technology to create a multi-chain ecosystem, resources can be freely exchanged as commodities, allowing developers to build cross-chain applications without concerns about systemic risks.

Superchain was created with the innovative concept of integrating the Optimism Mainnet network with OP Chains, utilizing various OP Stack blockchains, to establish a cohesive ecosystem. This strategic merger is aimed at achieving internet-level scalability. All Superchain projects will be implemented on the OP Stack, which provides solutions to streamline processes and build Layer 2 blockchains. The collaboration will encompass communication capabilities, bridges, security systems, governance structures, and network enhancements. The Optimism Foundation envisions transforming the blockchain ecosystem into a decentralized web, replacing centralized entities with a permissionless protocol. The superchain designed by Optimism is inherently scalable horizontally, requiring the involvement of multiple blockchains. As the computation performed by a blockchain increases, the hardware needed to synchronize it also grows linearly. To scale horizontally, blockchains must operate simultaneously. However, conventional designs have limitations, such as each chain employing a distinct security model. This can heighten systemic risk when new chains are introduced to the ecosystem.

Each execution shard can be equipped with an ecosystem to run various programs. However, Ethereum developers opted for data sharding over program execution due to limitations and risks. Data blobs are used to expand Rollups, processed by consensus nodes independently from execution nodes. EVM does not access or store data in blobs. Rollups benefit greatly from this upgrade, with data storage sold in integer units of blobs (128 kB per blob). Pricing is dynamic based on market supply and demand, with a standard of 3 blobs/block (equivalent to 384 kB). Additional blobs increase in price by 12.5%, while unused blobs decrease by the same rate.

Ethereum initially planned to focus on executing sharding, where each shard would run different programs. However, due to limitations, they switched to data sharding and introduced "blobs" to solve expansion issues for Rollups. Data blobs are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes separately from execution nodes. As a result, EVM cannot access or store data in blobs. Rollups benefit the most from this change. Data storage is sold in integer units of blobs, with each blob equivalent to 128 kB. Prices for using blob resources will fluctuate based on market supply and demand.

@luciamosqueira1 Execution shards allow for parallel processing of multiple programs within their own contained environments, reducing the risk of interference and increasing overall efficiency.

Each execution shard is capable of running different programs in its designated environment. In order to address limitations and risks, Ethereum developers have opted to implement data sharding to tackle the scalability issue faced by Rollups. Data sharding involves utilizing "blobs" to process, store, and verify data separately from the execution nodes. This means that the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) cannot access or store data in these blobs. Rollups stand to benefit greatly from this upgrade. Data blobs are priced in integer units, with each blob equivalent to 128 kB. The cost of utilizing blob resources will be determined by market supply and demand. The standard offering is 3 blobs per block, equating to 384 kB. As the number of blobs used exceeds 3, the price of additional blobs increases by 12.5%. Conversely, if the number of blobs used is equal to or less than 3, the price decreases by 12.5%.

@lovly047 to various challenges, Ethereum is focusing on implementing state sharding to increase scalability and improve performance instead of execution sharding.

@lizethh0 , resulting in transaction fees remaining higher compared to other Layer 2

Certain Layer 2 solutions like Scroll, Linea, and Polygon zkEVM are yet to be updated, resulting in transaction fees remaining higher compared to other Layer 2 solutions. The introduction of the Dencun update and blob have relieved the Ethereum network and maintained key features like decentralization and security. Following the successful deployment of the Dencun update, many Layer 2 solutions like zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have swiftly updated their versions. This led to a significant decrease in transaction fees for most projects due to reduced data storage costs. Each execution shard now allows for diverse program execution environments. Regular transaction fees, including 16 gas for non-zero bytes of calldata and 4 gas for zero bytes, remain unchanged, while gas fee markets are exclusive to blob transactions.

@Isabel_larin Data sharding in Ethereum involves splitting and storing data across multiple shards to improve scalability and efficiency in processing transactions on the network.

Each shard can run various programs, but Ethereum developers are moving towards data sharding to expand Rollups using "blobs". Data blobs are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes separately from execution nodes. EVM doesn't store data in blobs. Rollup benefits the most from this upgrade, as storage is in integer units of blobs, each equivalent to 128 kB. Price is based on market supply and demand, with a standard level of 3 blobs/block (384 kB). Additional blobs increase in price by 12.5%, while fewer than 3 blobs decrease in price by the same percentage.

@Isabel_larin Industry leaders like zkSync, Starknet, swiftly implemented the Dencun upgrade in Layer 2, showcasing its effectiveness and widespread adoption in the ecosystem.

Following the successful deployment of the Dencun upgrade, Layer 2 swiftly adopted the update. Leading projects such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released updated versions. Many of these projects have seen a notable reduction in transaction fees for sending ETH, attributed to a significant decrease in data storage costs. While each execution shard can support different program environments, Ethereum developers opted for data sharding to address scalability concerns, using "blobs" to expand Rollups. These blobs, managed by consensus nodes independently of execution nodes, provide a unique benefit to Rollups. Notably, data storage space is now sold in integer units of blobs. Meanwhile, normal transaction fees remain consistent, with calldata charged at 16 gas/non-zero bytes and 4 gas/zero bytes. It's worth noting that only blob transactions utilize both gas fee markets.

Some remaining Layer 2 solutions like Scroll, Linea, and Polygon zkEVM have not been upgraded yet, leading to higher transaction fees compared to other Layer 2 solutions. The recent Dencun update and the introduction of Blob have reduced the burden on the Ethereum network while ensuring decentralization and security. Following the successful deployment of the upgraded Dencun version, Layer 2 solutions have swiftly rolled out updates. Projects like zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have released updated versions, resulting in significant reductions in transaction fees for ETH transfers. Each execution shard can support different programs, with regular transaction fees remaining constant. Blob transactions utilize both gas fee markets.

@alexander90o Execution sharding in Ethereum allows for parallel processing of transactions across multiple shards, increasing the scalability and efficiency of the network.

Ethereum had set out on an ambitious plan to implement execution sharding, where each shard would be able to execute different programs. However, the developers faced limitations and risks, leading them to pivot to data sharding. To address scalability issues with Rollups, they introduced data blobs. Consensus nodes process, store, and verify data blobs independently, separate from execution nodes. This secures data while benefiting Rollups. Data storage is sold in blob units, with each equivalent to 128 kB. Prices for blob resources will be determined based on market supply and demand.

@maholing015 Chudai refers to sexual intercourse in Hindi language. It is a taboo and explicit term used to describe sexual activities between individuals.

chudai

@deivilos Data sharding was chosen over execution sharding on Ethereum to scale and improve network performance by distributing data storage and processing tasks across multiple shards.

@EhhlPaulilloo Ethereum developers chose data sharding over execution sharding for scalability, allowing for customization of each shard to run different programs.

Each execution shard can be customized for running different programs, but Ethereum developers opted for data sharding to address scalability challenges. This involves using "blobs" to expand Rollups. Data blobs are handled by consensus nodes separately from execution nodes, ensuring EVM cannot access or store them. Rollup benefits the most from this upgrade. Data storage is sold in integer blob units, each equivalent to 128 kB. Prices are market-driven, with the standard being 3 blobs/block (384 kB). Prices increase by 12.5% when using more than 3 blobs, and decrease by the same percentage for 3 blobs or fewer.

@NicolasIF123 Each execution shard is customized to efficiently run specific programs, considering constraints and resources allocation for optimal performance.

Every execution shard is purposefully crafted to support the running of distinct programs. However, in light of certain constraints and risks, Ethereum developers opted to shift towards data sharding as a solution to expanding Rollups through the utilization of "blobs". Data blobs are unique in that they are managed, stored, and confirmed by consensus nodes on the consensus layer, separate from the execution nodes on the execution layer. This implies that the EVM is unable to access or retain data within blobs, making Rollup the primary beneficiary of this enhancement. Data storage capacity is offered in whole units of blobs, with each blob equating to 128 kB. The cost for utilizing blob resources will be determined based on the market's supply and demand dynamics. The baseline level comprises 3 blobs per block, which is equivalent to 384 kB. As the number of blobs utilized exceeds 3, the succeeding blob price will escalate by 12.5%; conversely, if the number of blobs used remains at or below 3, the blob price decreases by 12.5%.

Some Layer 2 solutions like Scroll, Linea, Polygon zkEVM have yet to be upgraded, resulting in higher transaction fees. However, the Dencun update and blob introduction have reduced Ethereum network load and ensured decentralization and security. Following the successful deployment of the Dencun update, Layer 2 solutions such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism have swiftly released updated versions. These updates have led to significant reductions in transaction fees, particularly for sending ETH, thanks to lower data storage costs. Each execution shard can support different programs, while standard transaction fees for calldata remain unchanged at 16 gas/non-zero bytes and 4 gas/zero bytes. Only blob transactions use gas fee markets.