Louis Hinkle

BREAKING: Look at this. $DELL just won a five-year $9.7 billion Pentagon software agreement for the US military. But Trump also bought $DELL. He bought multiple times since February 10th, up to more than $5,000,000. On May 8th, he said: "Go out and buy a Dell." Unusual.

CEOs are quietly realizing the AI replacement plan has a problem. Two problems, actually. One: the token costs for running AI agents are now exceeding what they were paying the employees they fired. Two: when the tokens run out, the AI stops. Just stops. No continuity. No workaround. Just a spinning wheel where your workforce used to be. You fired humans to save money and bought a subscription that bills you into a corner. The employees you let go knew what to do when things broke. The AI just invoices you for the outage. And then there’s the permission problem nobody wants to talk about. To do its job, the AI agent needs access. Full access. Your systems, your patents, your contracts, your future plans. Everything you spent years building, handed over to a process that has no loyalty, no discretion, and no skin in the game. You didn’t hire a replacement. You gave a stranger with no soul the keys to everything you own. Enjoy.

Pres Zelensky formally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. CBS

MMAT | In re Meta Materials Inc. | Case No. 24-50792-gs | Doc 2820 | Filed May 27, 2026 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part FINRA’s Motion to Quash Trustee Subpoenas ⚠️ Not Legal Advice The big picture This is a major discovery win for the Chapter 7 Trustee. Judge Spraker basically said: “FINRA, you do have to turn over important trading/manipulation-related data. But there are limits, and the trustee has to pay certain production costs.” This order is directly tied to the trustee’s investigation into potential manipulation of Meta stock (MMAT / TRCH / MMTLP). ⸻ What happened in plain English FINRA tried to block the subpoenas FINRA asked the court to either: Kill the subpoenas entirely (motion to quash) OR Narrow them significantly via protective order. The judge said: Not entirely. Some yes. Some no. Hence: “Granted in part, denied in part.” ⸻ What the Trustee WON 🥇 1) Short Interest Data — PRODUCE IT FINRA must turn over reported short interest data. That includes: TRCH + MMAT Sept. 21, 2020 → Aug. 21, 2024 MMTLP June 28, 2021 → Dec. 14, 2022 Layman’s meaning: This shows what broker-dealers were reporting as short positions. This helps answer: Was short interest unusually elevated? Did reported short positions match actual market behavior? Were there anomalies around key events? ⸻ 2) TRF Data — HUGE 🧨 FINRA must produce Trade Reporting Facility (TRF) data. Same date ranges. This is likely one of the most important parts of the order. Why? TRF captures off-exchange / OTC reported trades, often associated with internalized trading / market maker activity. Layman’s translation: If the trustee is investigating alleged manipulation, this is where some of the most meaningful footprints could live. Judge even ordered: FINRA must expedite production due to time pressure. That’s important. ⸻ 3) Reg SHO Daily Short Sale Volume Data FINRA must produce this too. Same date ranges. This helps show: Daily short sale activity Short-sale patterns Whether activity spiked during sensitive periods Not proof of wrongdoing by itself. But valuable puzzle pieces. ⸻ Timing priority (important) 👀 📆FINRA agreed to prioritize production in this order: MMAT 2023 MMAT 2024 MMAT 2022 MMAT 2021 Then TRCH Then MMTLP Why that matters: The trustee likely wants the most actionable data first given statute/time pressure. ⸻ Judge explicitly referenced manipulation investigation This is a key line. Judge ordered FINRA to move quickly because of: “potential manipulation of Meta stock.” That’s notable. This is not a finding that manipulation occurred. But it confirms the court recognizes the trustee’s investigation as legitimate and time-sensitive. ⸻ Requests put on HOLD (not denied yet) Requests 4–5: Monthly OTC Summary Report Data Weekly OTC Summary Report Data Judge said: Let’s wait. Reason: The trustee may get enough from Requests 1–3 first. If more is still needed, the parties must meet and confer. If they still fight, they can come back to court. Translation: This door is still open. ⸻ What FINRA WON Requests 6–9 were QUASHED entirely. Meaning: FINRA does NOT have to produce whatever those categories were seeking. So this was not a total trustee sweep. ⸻ Costs — trustee pays Because FINRA is a nonparty, Rule 45 cost protections apply. Meaning: If producing the data is expensive or burdensome: the trustee pays the production costs. This matters because FINRA had argued massive burden. The judge basically said: “Produce it—but the estate can shoulder the cost.” ⸻ Protective order remains in place Anything produced stays under the existing protective order. Meaning: This data is not automatically public. It’s controlled discovery material. So no—this does not mean shareholders get to immediately see raw trading records.

Just curious: deleting ~25,000 posts about a stock @Outlier_999 never owned… quoting Law Enforcement advised her 😂 …when on the other hand, the entire MMTLP calls are recorded and I worked with the Trustee to SAVE the corporate record from being destroyed. Dear Sam, for your information and whoever is advising you: in cases of online harassment, guidance from law enforcement and victim-support authorities consistently emphasizes PRESERVING evidence, not deleting it, precisely because deletions can complicate investigations and chain-of-custody (see references below) That makes the claim of bulk deletion “per advice of LE” extremely difficult to square with documented guidance, especially when the deletions involved commentary about stocks you never owned. Add to that the TIMING, account creation coinciding with the START of regulatory scrutiny and subsequent #MMTLP trading, the absence of any commentary on the Atlas Trading Group pump-and-dump, and the omission of a basic fact, I never sold a single share. These are not personal disputes. They are inconsistencies. And when narratives require removing records rather than preserving them, it’s reasonable to ask what purpose that serves. DYK: @outlier_999 account was created in 29th September 2021, one month before MMTLP began trading and the SAME month the SEC investigation began (but MMAT only disclosed the SEC part in Nov 2021 with the 10Q) So the reasonable question isn’t about me. It’s who is being protected, and why. Well, the walls are closing in from MULTIPLE places at the same time. Perhaps Sam has been related to, or dating one of those Atlas boys, or getting paid to troll, or maybe she just needs to check her meds, frankly I couldn’t care less… But, “Outlier” starts to look a lot like OUT-LIAR when the record keeps changing and the evidence keeps disappearing. With respect. #Discovery #FINRArule4111 #AML #MarketIntegrity

And here's evidence directly from @FINRA's Daily List showing how they typically handle "Exchanged" Event Type Corporate Actions both BEFORE and AFTER MMTLP. Notice that the overall Effective Date is linked to the actual Exchange and Cancellation, and Symbol Deletion is NEVER mentioned! Image 1 has 2 examples, image 2 includes 3. If you can, please comment below where FINRA has made Symbol Deletion the main focus of another "Exchanged" Event Type Corporate Action. @HesterPeirce @SECPaulSAtkins @The_DTCC

Here's larger versions of the Next Bridge Hydrocarbons prospectus, the Metamaterials PR, and proof that the brokerages planned for Position Close Only trading and forced liquidations in MMTLP after 12/8. Brokerages were NOT planning to allow "New Buys"! FINRA's U3 halt did NOT protect investors from buying MMTLP after 12/8! Any comment on our situation @elonmusk? I ask because you're pretty influential and you've had a history with sketchy regulators.

Here's further context! Image 1 shows the Next Bridge Hydrocarbons prospectus from 11/18/22 and the 11/23/22 Metamaterials PR. Notice that the effective date of the spin-off was 12/14/22 (after Market close). I'll add larger versions in another post below. Then when the Corporate Actions were posted on 12/6 & 12/8, the Effective Date became 00:00:00 12/13/22 (erasing two full settlement days). (image 2) Image 3 is an excerpt from FINRA CEO Robert W. Cook explaining that the U3 halt was necessary due to the timing and structure of the MMTLP Corporate Action. But FINRA was responsible for the issues with the timing and structure of the MMTLP Corporate Action. Then in image 4 you can see examples of when FINRA acknowledged the correct December 14 share cancellation date, but they waited until March 2023. Why didn't they make this correction on 12/8? It's because by keeping the focus on "Symbol Deletion" effective 12/13 rather than the true 12/14 (after Market close) "Effective Date" of the spin-off/exchange, FINRA was able to create the illusion that the timing and structure of the Corporate Action was problematic. And let's be clear! Even if a 12/12 Record Date and a 12/14 Share Distribution and MMTLP Share Cancellation Date was too short of a timeline, you know how you address this?! You work with the issuer to provide more time/adjust the dates before publishing the Corporate Action! This is why FINRA has Rule 6490. What FINRA did is they forced the issuer to accept a shorter timeline, which guaranteed that FINRA would have a reason to U3 halt trading directly before brokerages planned to implement Position Close Only trading and/or force liquidate short positions in MMTLP. @DOGE_SEC @SECPaulSAtkins How do you not see this?

By changing the language from "canceled" to "deleted" on December 8th while intentionally neglecting to correct the date to December 14th (after Market close), FINRA didn't fix the problem the revision should've addressed; they instead locked the trap. (image 1) FINRA ensured the Corporate Action on the Daily List would show an operational emergency, creating the exact administrative cover necessary to U3 halt the trading, freeze the Position Close Only trading planned by multiple brokerages, and protect clearing-house members from the settlement reckoning that was looming. The short 6 minute video quoted below shows an exact scenario that FINRA's actions were designed to prevent. FINRA's meeting with the DTCC without the issuer no doubt resulted in the exact language and dates needed to ensure the clearing houses would be protected. (image 3) The images here add further context to how FINRA overstepped their authority to accomplish this. When do the authorities step in? @FBI @FBIWFO @TheJusticeDept

The guy who was impeached, indicted, and helped lead Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election just became the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas. Everything is on the line this November.

Found some possible fraud and abuse for you to investigate, JD.

So … they ate babies. Say it out loud: they ate human beings. They did things to our children that only a demon from hell could participate in. And they’re still in office.

Hahahaha, they couldn't handle my burner account posting nonstop about Trump-endorsed Ken Paxton and how he basically pardoned a child rapist. You'll never stop the #smokefleet you vile fucking Nazis

@unusual_whales $2.29 BILLION buys a lot of silence 🤫 ​Remember when Elon Musk was posting about the Epstein files and calling out Trump? The truth has a price tag, and Washington just paid it 🙄

BREAKING: These option traders have made more than one billion dollars IN PROFIT! Yes, you read that right. On March 31st, Micron $MU bulls placed nearly $50-$60 million on the $400 calls, expirying on June 18th. Their trades at ask, urgent, all thirty minutes before close. They have not exited yet, in $1.43 billion of profit. All caught with Unusual Whales.

Thinking of Sally Ride on her birthday today. Sally’s passion for science and exploration led her to become the first American woman in space. Sally was a talented astronaut and an inspiration for so many young women across the world.

So since the DOJ dropped their autopen investigation into Biden after trump demanded it, can Biden apply for his share of the $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund??

U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has said he believes that DARPA, a secretive military agency, is spraying dangerous "chemtrails" in the sky and has vowed to put a stop to it, per NYP

Did you know that Donald Trump's son just married the daughter of Jeffrey Epstein's accountant? Well now you do.

$GNS [UPDATE] Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz + VStock Transfer, LLC This court order marks a major milestone and a decisive step forward for Genius Group. After a lengthy legal battle, Genius Group successfully concluded its private arbitration against LZG International, Inc. ("LZGI"), resulting in a final ICC sweeping victory. With this win secured, Genius Group immediately moved to enforce it by filing a new petition in federal court, asking the judge to officially confirm the decision and hold LZGI accountable. The implications are highly favorable for Genius Group as the case moves into its final stages. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil is streamlining the process by preparing to lift the temporary pause on the original lawsuit and merge it with Genius Group's new petition. This standard housekeeping effectively clears the runway to transform Genius Group’s private arbitration win into a powerful, legally binding federal court judgment, shutting down any potential evasion tactics by the opposing side. The court has set a rapid deadline of June 3, 2026, requiring both parties to file a joint letter regarding the consolidation of the cases. While Genius Group is positioned to fast-track its final judgment, the judge has issued a stern warning against any delays or rule-breaking. Any failure to comply with this deadline will result in severe penalties, including heavy fines or the total dismissal of legal defenses, putting Genius Group on a direct path to final vindication.