Lozz

Anyone arguing that AI will not be such a big deal to white collar work has smoke up their ASS It is called DENIAL Businesses are in business to make MONEY Wages and/or contractors are an EXPENSE AI reduces this expense substantially Still a long way until acceptance

Being in software in 2026 is like climbing a mountain where the mountain just grows upward You vibecode an idea and get lucky with traction. Then someone out-vibecodes you. Then they get out-vibecoded. And again. This time with more money involved, smaller margins… Race to 0. Eventually AI will exhaust you because again, the mountain is infinite in height But. Buying Bitcoin with profit generated could become the new business moat. It could be like having an oxygen tank as you climb up without realising it. Something I am doing anyway.

buying bitcoin is how we avoid funding future wars

eventually it was going to bounce i just wish it went lower to buy even more

High yields in Dubai are for a reason The risk has always been the neighbouring geopolitical tensions

Every AI company is virtuous right now Until someone like China who gives no fucks about ethics suddenly reveals their fleet of terminator robots ready for war

Can anyone convince me that hyperinflation won’t happen

The problem with the current Bitcoin dominance calculation on cmc is that it includes stablecoins So it’s not that helpful to compare to actual alts unless you exclude it

the btc triangle could break down to 60k or up to 75k (my chart is in aud) remember, in 2028, the block reward halves 1.5625 btc rofl and between now and then the world has to decide to endure austerity (more taxes & less government spending) or inflate the problems away. but austerity means political suicide (aka nobody will vote for trump). but, quantum fud? brother please. satoshi's wallets getting jacked will be the least of our problems if that happens just keep buying over the year. get called lucky later when satoshi's divine economics kick in. same fucking shit each time

@ausbtcclub we date the interest rates. part of the business the renter pool just increases the higher the interest rates go

Will Australian investment property owners be happy with their investment when interest rates hit 7%? December quarter 2025 had Australian average investment property loan balance at $717,600. In 2021 average loans were $540,000 for investment properties. $717,600 at 6% = $43,056 in interest. $717,600 @ 7% = $50,233 Every 0.25% is $1,794 in extra interest. So glad we got out of that market and in Bitcoin.

@ManaMoonNFT It has to bounce soon to make the higher low otherwise it pretty much is going in to smash it Macro env just looks shit so I think it will get smashed Just nothing going on for the it too other than a Korean gambler

@lozzweb3 eth/btc back at April lows of 0.018 and BTC at 55.5k = $1,000 ETH would be crazy if it got that far but you never know

what would you do if this happened

@VitalikButerin It's crazy that it took over 100+ chains to suck the blood out of Ethereum to realise that the L1 is the only thing that matters in the first place

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

In a bear market you want to be accumulating only BTC Buying alts is smoke and mirrors until BTC makes a new all time high again look at BTC dominance. it wants to continue up atm, everything outside of BTC is designed to seperate you from your $

AI will make you jobless. Crypto will make you not need a job. Buy and hold now, retire in a few years. 🙋‍♂️if crypto allowed you to retire already. (Not financial advice)

Every genius that predicts market crashes will be right at some point Then the money printer comes back online to remind them money in 2025 is different to 1929 / pre-1971. There is no more austerity. They will just print more dollars.

I've entered the exodus @ThePlagueNFT Smooth process, well done. Exciting 🐸

@Pons_ETH do i get another 1/1 if i sacrifice? not sure if i missed a post on it i am sidelining the decision

On to the new.

@mooneyy It’s nonsense People don’t realise that number go up, is marketing in itself HYPE’s up-only chart brought many holders and users to the table. You literally had to use the platform to buy it, and they were pumping it hard

"Build and they will come" is a myth. Web3 is an attention market. This space is overly-saturated, noisy and moves quickly - it's extremely hard for a good product to be magically discovered. Marketing doesn't replace PMF - it helps amplify it. The best marketing looks invisible - not the big, loud KOL waves you see projects fall into. It's about sustaining attention and giving people a reason to care and be involved. A bad product can't be saved by marketing, but a good one can go undiscovered without it.

@mooneyy 💪 my man

@lozzereth thats my dev

After recovering $50K+ in tokens from ETH sweepers for people, I built a tool 🛠️ Asset Migrator uses EIP-7702 to securely move assets from a compromised wallet, even with an active sweeper bot. ✅ Free to use ✅ Multi-chain ➡️ allthingsweb3.com/tools/migrate-…