Karl Meyer

Dr. Maynard: "Healthcare workers in Israeli prisons - tortured. Genitals repeatedly attacked. Electrocuted through their genitals. Blindfolded for 60 days straight. Handcuffed. Forced to kneel or sit for 60 days. Beaten regularly. Electrocuted." Not by ISIS. Not by a cartel. By the Israeli Prison Service. Guards. Military This isn't a few bad apples - it's a systematic

You’re paying $5.7 billion for nothing  Ottawa’s climate cult has lost its mind. Carney's government is throwing billions of your tax dollars at a completely useless technology: Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS). Here are the facts: the CCUS Investment Tax Credit alone will cost Canadian taxpayers $5.7 billion between 2022 and 2028. On top of that, the government has dumped over $350 million in “Energy Innovation Program” grants. But here is the simple scientific truth that Liberals and Conservatives politicians won’t admit: CO₂ is NOT a pollutant. It is a colorless, odorless, non-toxic gas that is essential for life on Earth. Plants need it. Trees need it. Without CO₂, there is no photosynthesis, no food, no forests, no life. We don’t need to “capture” carbon. Trees capture carbon. They do it for free, naturally, and have done so for millions of years. There is no climate emergency. There is no need for a $5.7 billion government boondoggle. So why is the government forcing this down our throats?  Because for them CO₂  is a pollutant and needs to be captured. And what about the fake Conservatives?  Pierre Poilievre and his team talk a big game, but they will not cut this spending. They will keep the handouts flowing to the same corporate lobbyists who benefit from CCUS. They are Liberal-lite. Only the People’s Party of Canada will: •Recognize CO₂ for what it is, a natural, essential gas, not a pollutant. •CUT ALL funding for CCUS, every single dollar of the $5.7 billion tax credit and the $350 million in grants. •Let Canadian energy compete without being saddled with useless, expensive, pseudo-green technology. The climate cult wants you to believe that the government can fix the weather. It cannot. But it can waste your money and that is exactly what it is doing. No more billions for carbon capture. No more pseudoscience.

THE SUN IS WHAT DRIVES TEMPERATURE ON EARTH, NOT CO2! The warming from the Sun is cyclical, it's NOT constant. The distance of where you are from the Sun is constantly changing because both the Earth's orbit around the Sun is irregular and the Sun itself wobbles due to the combined gravitational pull of all the planets together. Look at the Schwabe solar cycle of 11 years, the Jose solar cycle of solar Inertial Motion of 179 years, Eddy Solar Cycle of 1000 years, the Bray-Halstatt Cycles of 2300-2500 years, then look into the three Milankovitch Cycles. Short to medium term climate change: Solar Inertial Motion: the combined mass of the planets also moves the position of the Sun through their combined gravitational pull, meaning the Sun moves around following the ever moving barycentre of the Solar system rather than being in a fixed central point in the middle Solar System. That is the key thing to understand: the Sun is moving around, wobbling in spiral like motion as it travels, it is not stationary. Once you understand that all medium term climate change can be explained simply because of the Sun's changing distance from the Earth. None of this has anything to do with humans. None of this has anything to do with CO2. The models of the Solar System you grew up believing as a child were gross over simplifications. They conditioned you to believe that the Solar system has a fixed Sun position with a regular Sun activity with regular orbits, of which the Earth is one. Yet that is not the reality: not only the earth both tilts and wobbles as it orbits, but the orbit is a changing ellipse not a perfect circle, meaning the distance from the Sun is not constant. These are the three Milankovitch cycles. Also other planets have irregular orbits. The combined effect of all these irregular orbits together pulls the Sun off centre of the solar system into the barycentre. A wobbling Sun is the real reason for short to medium term climate change, and an irregular earth orbit, tilt and wobble is the reason for long term climate change. And this is just the beginning of the story of irregularity in the Earth's orbit around the Sun, then there are cycles of Sun activity, making it stronger and weaker according to how close to the 11 year cycle of magnetic poles flip it is, next being in 2024, and how many Sun spots & Solar flares we are exposed to. Then you need to factor volcanic activity, the Hunga-Tonga Hunga underwater volcanic eruption of January 2022 increased the water vapour in the stratosphere by 10%, this in itself will cause considerable warming of the planet in most regions. It's definitely not a simplistic neat black and white story of CO2, a minor greenhouse gas, as 95% of the earth's greenhouse gases are constituted by water vapour instead. Humans have no power to determine either the orbit of the Earth around the Sun or the Sun's internal & external activity, or the water vapour in the atmosphere. Life adapts much more easily to higher temperatures and increases in CO2, particularly plants, vegetation, trees, plankton& phytoplankton, than it does to decreases in CO2. The real danger is a decrease of CO2, and a decrease in temperature, not an increase in either. Once again, we have been deceived by a systematically corrupt scientific funding system linked to oligarchs interests. CO2 was always a control knob for economic prosperity, not climate.

The point which seems impossible to get across to the climate hysterics, is that IT DOES NOT MATTER IF TEMPERATURES ARE INCREASING OR NOT because the cause is certainly not CO2 emissions, rather that is always the EFFECT of warming:

Post a picture YOU took, Just a pic. No description

@JohnFMauldin Ancient Greek democracy also distinguished between citizens and slaves.

Aristotle being politically incorrect.

The madness never stops. A family member who lives in Germany went to a doctor and called me, it was a simple visit to check blood values. During the routine medical history she also mentioned my vaccine injury and my symptoms. The doctor became immediately aggressive. Not curious. Not cautious. Aggressive. He stated that vaccine injuries do not exist and he does not want to hear about it anymore. And then, without ever having met me, without any assessment and being physically there, without any examination, he threatened that I should be sent to a psychiatric ward. That he can contact a psychiatrist. Neurologist and a psychotherapist asap. That if I did not comply, the matter would be escalated to the district court. That if necessary, the police would come to collect me together with the therapist. The police. To take a seriously ill man from his home to a psychiatric facility who doesn’t even live there and hasn’t spoken one word to the doctor…A doctor he has never met decided, in seconds, that his documented suffering does not exist. This is happening. Not in a story. Today. I share this not for outrage, though the outrage is legitimate. I share it because the people need to know that this is what the system looks like when it is confronted with the truth of what was done. Not curiosity. Not care. Immediate aggression and the threat of institutional force. Never heard anything like it before. This is the system protecting itself. And it is exactly what the injured have been describing for years while being told they were imagining things. To every vaccine injured person reading this, you are not imagining it. And to every doctor who has responded this way to a suffering patient , history is watching. Absolute madness. Never heard something like this after 5 years of suffering from a gene therapy without any recognition. And once again I write this very politely And no this is not made up or a joke..

COVID lockdowns were a live-action Stanford Prison Experiment. No basement. No fake prison. No coin flip to decide who gets the uniform. Just a press conference, an emergency declaration, and a world that divided itself, almost overnight, into guards and prisoners. In 1971, Philip Zimbardo took 24 ordinary college students. Psychologically screened. Emotionally stable. Good people. He gave half of them guard uniforms and sunglasses. The other half, prison smocks and chains. The experiment was supposed to run two weeks. He shut it down after six days. The “guards” had become cruel. Psychologically tormenting prisoners. Inventing humiliating rules. Enforcing them with genuine enthusiasm. The “prisoners” had broken. Stopped using their real names. Forgotten they could simply walk out. Nobody told the guards to be brutal. The role did. Nobody told the prisoners to lose themselves. The situation did. Now look at 2020. Within weeks, entire categories of identity were created. Essential. Non-essential. Compliant. Denier. Neighbors reported neighbors for sitting in their own gardens. Police issued fines for walking alone on empty beaches. Local officials, suddenly intoxicated with emergency powers, closed playgrounds, taped off park benches, and enforced rules that existed nowhere in law. And the medical establishment? Doctors who spent careers advocating for patient autonomy began enforcing mandates without questioning them. Hospital administrators banned family from dying relatives and called it protocol. Nurses filmed themselves doing choreographed dances in empty wards while patients died alone. The uniform changed. The behavior followed. The terrifying lesson of Stanford wasn’t that evil people do evil things. It was that ordinary people, given a role, a structure, an institutional justification, will do things they would never otherwise consider. And feel righteous doing it. The situation didn’t reveal character. It replaced it. This is what power does when it goes unchecked. It doesn’t need monsters. It just needs roles. Rules. A chain of command. Language that makes obedience sound like responsibility. “We’re just following the science.” Zimbardo followed his experiment too. Right off a cliff. The most dangerous moment in any crisis is when ordinary people stop asking whether what they’re doing is right and start asking whether it’s authorized. Your conscience doesn’t clock out because the institution told you to comply. It never did. It never should.

It is embarrassing that many of the so-called “leaders” in this country, including current and former elected officials, academics, and legacy media figures, have resorted to childish fearmongering and name-calling instead of engaging in serious discussions about serious issues. What it really exposes is the remarkably unsophisticated level of public discourse coming from people who present themselves as informed, sophisticated, knowledgeable, or worthy of leadership. I have said this many times before: I am tired of listening to those voices. They are not sophisticated. They are not knowledgeable. And they are not leaders. Just look at them. What have many of them actually built or accomplished outside of politics, public institutions, or media circles? Many obtained their positions through timing, connections, luck, political machinery, and with the public purse, only to turn around and disparage the very public that funded and elevated them. And now they expect ordinary citizens to treat them as intellectual or moral authorities while simultaneously being disrespected and disregarded. No more. I want to hear from people who actually matter. From people who create. From people who build. From people who work hard in their communities without demanding attention or titles. From people who solve problems instead of manufacturing fear. From people grounded in reality, not ideology or self-preservation. Because it is becoming increasingly obvious that the wisest and most thoughtful people are not the ones sitting behind podiums or television panels. If they were, we would not be living through collapsing public trust, failing institutions, and levels of division between friends, families, and neighbours that many of us have never seen before.

I know I’m beating a dead horse at this point but I find it fascinating that not a single mainstream outlet is willing to inform its readers that this man once declared Ukraine’s purpose is to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade against Semite-led Untermenschen”

This trend is being echoed across America with an apparent rise and cancer cases, including among the young, as well as a rise in many other strange and sometimes mysterious illnesses. And yet nobody is tracking to see which ones may correlate with Covid and Covid vaccinations. And as long as we’re not doing that, we aren’t figuring out treatments and answers that are surely knowable. People are suffering needlessly because of institutional and willful neglect.

@RT_com What is the purpose of robots having a humanoid form? The first paragraph of the AI answer below is not true. There are better forms a robot could take. As for 'psychological acceptance,' I read this as anaesthetizing us. What are they lulling us into?youtube.com/watch?v=eLVAMG…

Serbia's Vucic STUNNED by state-of-the-art robotics factory in China During a tour in Jiaxing, Vucic saw robots do kung fu, cooking food and even performing a Serbian dance

▪️AI data centres guzzle 5 million gallons of water per day. The equivalent of daily water use for 50,000 people. ▪️A single large AI data centre can consume as much electricity as 400,000 households. But let’s blame cow burps for destroying the environment. 🤷‍♂️

@lexfridman When I lived in Japan, I really wanted to visit Yakushima. I think it's supposed to be one of the rainiest places on earth. japan.travel/national-parks…

I've been on a wild travel journey in China for several weeks, with only a backpack, making new friends and meeting & getting to know people from all walks of life. I've been truly humbled and inspired by everyone's kindness. Next, I'm hopping over to Taiwan (first time for me) to hang out with Jensen, attend Computex, eat a bunch of street food, and just have fun talking to all kinds of folks around the city & beyond. After that, no plans, anything goes. As always, please give travel suggestions or fill out coffee form if you want to hang out in Taiwain or anywhere else in the world. Love you all! ❤️

@TheCinesthetic All Is Lost w/ Robert Redford

What is a movie you will defend forever, even if most people do not get it?

How do societies justify treating people unequally under the law? History gives us uncomfortable answers. Unequal treatment has often been defended using legal frameworks, prevailing beliefs, or claims of necessity. Canadians should be cautious whenever different rules apply to different groups. The question is not whether unequal treatment can be justified. The question is: what principles are we willing to sacrifice in the process? Constitutional rights, equality before the law, and the rule of law only matter if they apply consistently. For more, follow my substack at: @shawnbuckleylaw" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@shawnbuckleyl… @unscrewthenews #ShawnBuckley #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionalLaw #EqualityBeforeTheLaw #Canada #LegalAnalysis #CharterRights

@gguworld This is a clip from "20 feet from Stardom," an excellent documentary about backup singers.

This is Mary Clayton's vocal on “Gimme Shelter” stripped completely naked. No music. Just her. That crack in her voice was not planned. It was real. The Stones kept it.

An Inconvenient Truth for climate alarmists: Al Gore’s dramatic climate warnings shaped a generation — but 20 years later, the data tell a very different story. Climate-related deaths are down 97% over the past century, polar bears more than doubled since the 1960s, and global burned area has decreased by more than 25% over the past quarter century. That's hardly a success of climate policy though: fossil fuels still provide 81% of world energy, emissions keep rising, and $16 trillion+ spent on green policies since Gore's movie came out hasn’t changed the trajectory. A good reminder that panic is a terrible policy adviser. newsweek.com/data-vs-drama-…

Naval Ravikant thinks modern medicine is way less advanced than we assume. We’re still cutting out organs we don’t fully understand, relying on shallow biological theories, and heavy regulation is blocking bold experimentation. He predicts future generations will look back at this era and wonder how we accepted it. This one really made me pause. We tend to treat current medicine as near-perfect, but Naval’s point forces you to question how much is still guesswork and temporary fixes. Real breakthroughs in health and longevity will only come when we get honest about the limitations of what we have today.

The scientists who wrote the "lab leak is a conspiracy theory" letter? They organized it themselves then told each other they needed "the appearance of independence." Both were paid intel informants. Both worked with the Wuhan lab. One scientist called it genetically engineered. Days later he wrote the opposite. Then got a $9 million grant. No conspiracy required. Just people covering their own tracks.