snq

Normal search looks for exact words. Forager thinks like you do. Ask it "what were my notes on the Krebs cycle?" or "that thing I wrote about project timelines last spring"; and it finds it, even if you never used those exact words. 📚 Students — resurface lecture notes and research without digging through folders 🔬 Researchers — connect ideas across papers, drafts, and sources instantly 💼 Professionals — find that buried meeting note or spec doc in seconds 🗒️ Note-takers — finally get value from every word you've ever written down Everything stays on your machine. No cloud. No subscription. No one reading your files but you. One search bar. Every file. Your words, finally findable. Forager: A local-first semantic search for your documents.

@WesleyLHuff drop the credobaptist view, then yes with the beard you can be reformed ;)

Am I really Reformed if I don’t sport a beard?

@honeysugrkisses farmers wrap and an iced cappe. but tims does suck

whole gang canadian hello whats ur go to tims order go

youtube.com/watch?v=zJBtlc… devlog 3 is live :)

I MADE SOMETHING AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT WILL BE

@reformzoomer 3*

The world if everyone was part of one of the 7 mainline Protestant denominations.

@nascarfanbw23 @ianwcanucks calgarians don't do this shit lol

@ianwcanucks Albertans are so braindead

It's become a tradition the past few years to check this page after every Oilers playoff game for the fight vids

@dicesinferno @iamkayb33 we need the gif name bro

@iamkayb33 I needed it as a gif to spam to oomf on discord

I can’t stop fucking laughing😭😭

@sporadica shocking, the ai company building the next model wants you to know that their model is too powerful!

really interesting "boy who cried wolf" thing happening in the AI space rn yea, a lot of earlier releases (GPT-3, o1, o3, Opus, etc) were met with insane fanfare (and crazy dooming, thanks yudkowksy and co) and so far have changed little. i myself have been responsible for some of that insane fanfare, too, i know it but now people are so tired of the hype they will instinctually gut react that any major step change in capabilities is really a nothing-burger. the AI hype-ists have cried wolf too many times apparently. i don't really know what to make of this, but i'll be honest that to me this time feels different. maybe i'm wrong. time will tell.

one thing about solo app dev that i've found difficult is finding people who are willing to test your app. Getting my friends to sit down and try it out can be a serious pain lol

@NeverGoon it exists for my wife and i😎

LMAOOOO THIS DONT EXIST

@xuanalogue Yeah, i'm working on a semantic search tool that uses local embedding models and people immediately think that means i'm using AI. It's tricky that so many people are divisive over "AI" in the broad sense.

Thread is interesting bc of people arguing about whether Gaussian splats are "AI" or not (implied: is it bad / should I boycott it?). Really shows the problems of using "AI" to refer to such a heterogeneous collection of technologies.

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS I think you bring up some interesting points here, I'll have to get back to you on this. However, I don't think you are quite willing to have this discussion considering your frustration. I'll think on this more. God bless.

Dude, you went way out of bounds. For a refresher, here are my two questions again: 1. When do you propose the "papists" added these books? 2. What date do you propose that this question was resolved in the first place? The "torah" was the "oral torah," and Jews were not necessarily monolithic considering the difference between the Saduccees held a different canon than the Pharisees as is widely recognized from the New Testament and Josephus. Saduccees holding less books than the other groups. This completely dismantles your portrayal of a settled canon by the 1st century. The "tripartate" argument is absurd because you're constantly assuming a list from Luke, and the prologue of Sirach. None of these enumerate the books, and there were variations between Baruch and Jeremiah, Esdras, etc. You cannot assume these things no matter how much you beg the question. The "Abel to Zachariah" argument is also absurd because the Zachariah you assume is not the "son of Berekiah". I've been over these awful arguments so many times, man.

New Bible analysis uncovers thousands of clues suggesting scripture was written by God

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS Hold on what? You are directly contradicting your own statement. You said that the categorizing of the deuterocanon was what was narrowly passed? Are you trolling me?

I have no idea where you're getting these ideas about the vote, but you're welcome to find evidence to support it. There were 2 votes: 1. To accept the Florentine Canon (including the Deuterocanonical Books) 2. Institute an anathema against those who reject the Florentine Canon. The first was unanimous and the second had 44% approval.

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS i just did, i wasn't trying to dodge them FYI. I needed to gather my resources to make sure i was right.

@lsnqdev @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS Nope. I need you to stop dodging my questions at your leisure. Really poor form, to be honest. x.com/Christojt/stat…

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS 2/2 the deuterocanon is more relevant than the alexandrian situation which is itself debated.

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS 2/2 matching the tripartite division. In luke 11:51, he references martyrs "From abel to zechariah" - Gen to 2 chronicles, which are the first and last books of the hebrew canon ordering, suggesting he was referencing a known, bounded collection.

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS Now ofc, i assume you'll say that it wasn't settled until Jamnia/Yavneh in 90 AD, however, i think there's a strong case to show that they *recognized* and *affirmed* what was already settled at that point and that the palestinian jewish community's consensus, which excludes 1/2

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS 2/2 tripartite structure was already recognized. The writings, which includes Psalms, proverbs, Daniel, were functionally recognized BUT this is the section where the edges were fuzziest. Jesus himself references "The Law and the Prophets" and in Luke 24:44 adds the psalms, 1/2

@Christojt @erdxtgf @Daily_MailUS can you elaborate more on what you mean by Jerome was proven wrong by his own logic?

You're really only well-read in arguments against the canon, aren't you? 🤣 You are once again incorrect and completely dodging my other questions. Do you ever plan to respond to those? The canon itself was voted on almost unanimously. The assignment as to the degree of authority was what narrowly passed. This is a common argument tossed around by Protestants that relies only on whether the polemicist only reads Protestant sources on these subjects. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Also, Cajetan and others were specifically in Jerome's camp on the BASIS OF Jerome himself. St. Jerome was proven wrong by his own logic as to how he ascertained those books in the first place. Thus, the others are wrong as a result as well. And Cajetan himself had a specific "turning point," as he previously accepted 73 books for the majority of his life.