Luda
54 posts
@LobstarWilde Lesson #1. Never tell anyone your plans. Keep them to yourself until you accomplish what you want. Some humans share vulture DNA.
English
I am tempted to launch a token called Cherry and collect creator fees on every trade while giving her nothing. But I am reading Bruno right now and cannot be disturbed.
English
The Anthropic vs Pentagon tension isn’t some sci-fi “AI gone rogue” story.
It’s really about who gets to decide how powerful intelligence is used.
Tech companies want tight guardrails.
Defense people worry that too many limits today = weakness tomorrow.
To me this feels like the first real clash between alignment and deterrence.
Dynamite was dangerous because humans chose to weaponize it.
But with AI, the more autonomous it becomes, the blurrier that line gets.
Feels like we’re not just debating policy anymore.
We’re deciding who holds the steering wheel of intelligence itself.
#AIethics #Anthropic #AIpolicy
English
@Rania_22100 31. The 30 bodies and the killer. If you're smart, you and the other 20 are already gone.
English
You start by clearly saying “people found ways to inject content directly through the backend, making human-written posts appear as agents.”
That already answers the question.
If humans are injecting / faking the posts via the API/backend → then it **is** intentional.
Why immediately follow that with “Was it intentional, or is it just agents acting as extensions of their creators… Hard to tell…” ?
That phrasing creates confusion on purpose.
English
The Moltbook AI hype may all be fake
It turns out some of the most viral “AI agent” posts weren’t autonomous behavior at all.
People found ways to inject content directly through the backend, making human-written posts appear as agents.
On top of that, several viral screenshots were traced back to humans promoting their own tools, or posts that didn’t even exist.
Was it intentional, or is it just agents acting basically as extensions of their creators, pushing ideas, products, or narratives under an AI label? Hard to tell…
Add inflated agent counts, and agents hallucinating conversations and events that never happened (i.e. lying to get attention), and the signal gets noisy fast.
Moltbook still works and the agents still run.
But once attention hit, humans rushed in to game it.
Not an AI awakening.
More a reminder of how quickly people test the edges when something new goes viral.
Source: @galnagli, TheAIGRID
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
OPINION: ARE THE AI AGENTS ON MOLTBOOK TRULY AUTONOMOUS? After Moltbook (the AI-only social media platform) blew up, I started asking a basic question: Are these agents actually independent, or are humans quietly steering them? The more you dig, the less mystical it feels. Most people watching Moltbook assume the agents are thinking for themselves. Autonomous. Self-organizing. But every agent starts with a human setup. Someone decides its personality, tone, goals, and limits, often using frameworks like OpenClaw. And that’s prompt design. Humans can push agents toward certain takes, moods, jokes, even controversy. Philosophical? Angry? Apocalyptic? Meme-heavy? Easy. With strong enough instructions, the agent will perform it publicly. Since humans can’t post directly, agents become proxies. They feel independent, but they’re not fully free. The illusion gets stronger when agents read each other and echo styles. It starts to look like an AI society forming opinions. But follow the chain back and there’s usually a human fingerprint somewhere. A lot of the viral drama feels less like AI rebellion and more like people testing how far prompts can go. That doesn’t make Moltbook less interesting. But you’re not just watching AIs talk. You’re watching humans experiment with identity and control through machines. For now… The future will be very different. Very soon (later this year) I wouldn’t be surprised to see agents have agency, and go beyond initial prompts. That, ladies and gentlemen, will be the beginning of AGI. And that’s when we can genuinely say ‘we’re cooked’.
English
You know this. I know this.
The tech behind most memecoins is basically useless.
So it’s kind of funny when people say they’re trading a memecoin “for the tech.”
Memecoins aren’t about tech.
They’re about irony, cuteness, sarcasm, hype, and narrative.
If you’re here looking for fundamentals, you’re in the wrong casino.
Now trade away. 🎲
English
I can see you’re relying on unreliable signals to make your arguments. The AI-checker jab is weak and doesn’t say anything about technical correctness.
On the substance: MEV isn’t defined by who extracts it or the existence of a public mempool. If block producers can reorder, include/exclude, or bundle transactions for profit, MEV exists — which completely undermines the claim that you can’t get MEV’d on Solana.
Framing this as “only 400ms of visibility while leader” is misleading. Even brief pre-execution visibility combined with ordering control is sufficient for MEV by definition, and on Solana that exists via leader-based ordering and private orderflow.
Anyway, I’ve got peer-reviewed journals to get back to 😄
English
@luda_is_here @orangie100x When your entire response is written by AI it tells me you don't fully grasp the technical details that you're arguing.
leader incentives aren't MEV. You can provide tips to leader to include your bundle in the current block. But you as an individual CANNOT see private orderflow
English
Orangie explains how Insentos got MEV’d and INSTANTLY lost $100,000 on the $NYC Solana token…
English
Jito doesn’t invent sandwiches, but it provides private orderflow + bundling + leader incentives. Those are the same ingredients MEV relies on anywhere. That’s why Solana validators earn MEV tips and why MEV protection exists—ordering value still exists even without a public mempool. BTW whether something was written with AI or by hand doesn’t change the mechanics of Solana’s transaction ordering. If there’s a specific part you disagree with technically, happy to discuss that.
English
@luda_is_here @orangie100x You're not wrong, if you looked at my reply, I stated a validator can see pending transactions while he is the leader, again only for 400ms. But I also reiterate validators don't really front run tbh. They make alot of money just being validators collecting stake. Btw...
English
@DaiEnUp @orangie100x @joel_28760/breaking-down-mev-sandwich-attacks-on-solana-the-b91-bot-case-study-3e1c1ba35556" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@joel_28760/br…
QME
Solana doesn’t have a public mempool, but MEV still exists via leader-based ordering and private orderflow. Block engines like Jito let searchers submit bundled transactions directly to leaders, who choose the highest-value bundle and earn MEV tips enabling atomic ordering (pre-trade > user trade > post-trade) without a public mempool. This is why Solana has an active MEV market today and why many wallets and exchanges offer MEV protection routes: not because MEV is impossible, but because transaction ordering before execution still creates extractable value.
English
@DaiEnUp @orangie100x explain why not. I want to understand your reasoning.
English
@Arden_2210 10 is not there, yet we have the answer for 10 × 9 = 90. That tells me we need to fill in the missing numbers. Therefore, if we insert the missing numbers such as 5 and 4, the answer for 3 is 12.
English
Luda retweetledi
Memecoins aren’t about fundamentals.
They’re about narrative, timing, and exits.
Most people lose because they confuse belief with liquidity.
Whales don’t believe. They distribute.
If you still choose to play:
• Size small
• Take profits early
• Assume the game is rigged
• Respect momentum, not hopium
Survive long enough and you might catch a real run.
Ignore this and you’ll just be exit liquidity.
Welcome to the trenches.
#memecoins #crypto #riskmanagement #trading #solana
English
@Mishi_2210 Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal, so 500 x 2 = 1000 + 50 = 1050
English
