s u n n y

@Xingqiu80276969 read all my statement, i alr answer this type of reply.

@lullalien Bener, tp realistis ajh, gamungkin kita bisa ngatur tbtb nyuruh org2 stop pakai generate ai

gak boleh, ya. generate ai art itu MERUGIKAN artist meski pun untuk konsumsi pribadi. kenapa? selain karena ai art mencuri sampel dari human artist, kalau disebarin di sosmed, sama aja kalian jadi enabler 😅 stop jadi orang ignorant.

@foebeeism canva exist.

@lullalien Aku penulis pemula, dan jujur mikir berkali2 untuk bikin cover pake AI... Aku mikirnya kalo aku generate AI art untuk coverku, nanti org2 mikir cerita yg aku buat juga hasil AI 😭

@MizzenMiller @epengprojects because you are all opressor towards us real human creator, kak. basic empathy aja gak nyambung, you have prabowongitis in you, its right when people call you stupid 🤷🏻‍♀️ saban hari ada desain dress yang dicuri dan digenerate, apalagi kalau bukan orang bodoh?

@lullalien @epengprojects Ntah lah cmiiw tpi dulu juga kamera diprotes pelukis potret? Google di protes banyak orang, dan itu ga beda kok, i just hate the fact haters ai calling someone pro ai is "stupid" without even try to understand our argument as if youre the righteous hehe

@MizzenMiller @yogi_Halim lagi aku jelasin BELAJAR dari artgod lewat konten tutorial ≠ generate karya mereka ke ai. harus berapa orang yang menjelaskan? sesederhana ini pun kalian bebal banget padahal kalau mau menghasilkan sesuatu tinggal learn to do it 🤷🏻‍♀️

@MizzenMiller @yogi_Halim hadeh, beda lah. dari awal aku bahas kalau penggunaan ai art itu gak boleh dari segi apa pun, terus dia bawa topik lain. toh tetap aku jawab 😃

@epengprojects 1. ada orang kayak anda yang mendukung kerusakan lingkungan dan berkurangnya lapangan pekerjaan 2. ada orang kayak anda yang membiarkan pencurian karya 3. ada orang kayak anda yang membiarkan teknologi mengikis cara kerja otak manusia 4. ada orang kayak anda

@epengprojects no. dari awal udah gak nyambung. im not surprised at all since enabler ai memang nalarnya (sorry) kurang. adanya ojol itu untuk memperluas lapangan pekerjaan dan lebih tertib, driver kalau apa2 bisa dilaporin, begitu pun cust. ai art ini justru bikin keadaan carut marut.

@myster0410 kamu maling untuk konsumsi pribadi dan gak disebar-sebar pun gak boleh. sesimpel itu 🤷🏻‍♀️

@lullalien Haha, konsumsi pribadi pun ga boleh? Bukannya itu hak individual? Ya terserah mereka. Selama AI art tidak komersilkan dan orangnya ngaku itu AI-generated, ya gapapa.

@epengprojects beda lah, ojek aja masih mempekerjakan manusia 🤷🏻‍♀️ stop throwing stupid takes i beg.

@lullalien Kalau dlm dunia per ojekan, kyaknya perumpamaan nya mirip kyak waktu awal2 ojol muncul.. opang banyak yg gk terima 😂

@unono @jokoweew @Zaa_maker "ignorat terhadap realita" 😭 kan realitanya ai art memang merugikan. yang sebenernya ignorant di sini kan dia 🤷🏻‍♀️

@lullalien @jokoweew @Zaa_maker sabar banget sama manusia ipk 2.3 😭

@jokoweew @Zaa_maker yang ignorant ke realita kalau ai itu merugikan artist siapa? 🤷🏻‍♀️ ignorant kan artinya gak peduli. kamu ai art enabler gak peduli sama sesama manusia, kamu gak peduli untuk belajar, kamu gak peduli.

@lullalien @Zaa_maker naif bgt, lu yg ignorant trhdp realita

@onemorepage @Raen4657 @ecutruin they never think about real human artist. im not surprised at all.

@lullalien @Raen4657 @ecutruin They think an artist cant have alt acc also the tweet itself is talking from artist perspective. Bet she/he will go blind and give zero fuck when the creator of ghibli himself is very sad when they feed ai generate with his art.

@Raen4657 @ecutruin lmao no. you dont have a point at all 🤗 youre just wanna feel included when this post itself coming from a real human artist.

@lullalien @ecutruin Just proving my point, but hey, you do you

@Raen4657 @ecutruin lmao im the artist here 😭 im literally defending me and my artist fellas who couldnt agree more. stfu and leave, this isnt a place for you ai art enabler 😅

@lullalien @ecutruin He's an artist too. Aren't *you* the one disregarding human artists here?

@ecutruin that term itself is irrelevant since real human artist has already spoke about this damn thing BILLION of times bro wake up 😭 you literally give zero fuck to real human artist, why i should give a fuck with that terms?

@lullalien Acknowledging what terms actually mean is somehow stupid?

@ecutruin lho, youre the one who disregarding real human artist at the very first place kok 🤔 ofc i will insult stupid takes. who wouldnt?

@lullalien It seems like you're just irrational. You're disregarding what the term theft actually means, and resorting to slinging insults when I simply explain why the claim of theft is incorrect. Why behave like this?

@ecutruin ive seen you replied too much defending ai, damn, i dont want you to interact with me anymore, please keep away your stupid ai takes on my post. you can interact with grok instead since youre being empathy to ai more than to real human 😅

@ecutruin ai art is theft. if you think its inaccurate, then why cant you think about these people who mocks artist under their post by generate their art? maybe youve gotten too much using ai ur brain couldnt works anymore 🫶 its okay, i understand.

@yogi_Halim never heard of him, but kamu yang kebiasa pakai ai ofc gak mengerti mengapa some of the tutor would reccs you something. bcs it can help you to be better at what ever you learn. gtfo, if you only want to ragebaiting people here. bcs i alr give you a clear answer.

@lullalien Andy Warhol created a famous series of silkscreens depicting the musician Prince. Based entirely on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith. This case went all the way to the US Supreme Court in 2023, stating that adding a "new expression" (like different colors) isn't enough to