A Star Wars 'ROTTA THE HUTT' spinoff series is reportedly in development at Disney and Lucasfilm.
Vince Gilligan ('BREAKING BAD', 'PLUR1BUS') will serve as showrunner.
(Source: deadline.com/2026/05/box-of…)
@bennyjohnson Only people to blame for this are the Democrats who encourage this sort of rhetoric. We've seen them speak, even text this online in their media postings, time and time again about encouraging this sort of thing by weaponizing their platforms and words.
🚨 UPDATE ON SHOOTING OUTSIDE OF WHITE HOUSE:
-Around 6pm, Gunman approached White House gate on West Side
-Gunman brandished pistol, fired 3x toward White House
-Secret Service returned fire
-Gunman taken down
-Bystander on street also hit by gunfire
-Gunman never got in perimeter
@TheTNHoller Billions in property damage,over 15 people murdered including police but the Democrats ignored this in fact they supported it at the time,let that sink in. All these dumb lying turds know how to do is parrot each other..J6..J6..J6...GTFOH!
Aya Tanjali is considering PRESSING CHARGES against Adrien Broner after he inappropriately touched her on stream, saying it has never happened to her before and she felt like crying 😳
NBC’s @GabeGutierrez: “With many Americans concerned about affordability ahead of the midterms, there is some backlash among Senate Republicans to some of your other priorities, the ballroom and the anti-weaponization fund. You clearly still have a stronghold in the Republican Party. Your candidates did very well this week during the primaries. But are you losing control of the Senate?”
President Trump: “My candidates did well. Not all candidates did well.”
Gutierrez: “But are you keeping control of the Senate, sir? Are you losing control of the Senate — Senate Republican?”
Trump: “I don’t know, I really don’t know. I can tell you. I only do what’s right. I don’t need money for the ballroom. You know, I’m making a gift of the ballroom. This is the biggest misreporting that I’ve ever seen. The ballroom is being built. It will cost we — it was going to be 200 million. I’ve doubled the size of it because we need it. And it’s being done in conjunction with the military and with the — very much in conjunction with the military and Secret Service. We’re on time on budget. It’s going beautifully. I have all the money I need. We’re making a gift to the United States. They came along and they said, we want to make it the House — the White House overall more secure. And I understand that. Not for me, because I’ll be gone. You know, I’ll be gone and you’ll have somebody else in for hopefully hundreds of years. But that’s what they’re doing it for. The ballroom is paid for. It’s a gift. I mean, I want to make it clear because so many people say, I thought you were giving this away. And all of a sudden the money that they’re spending is for security having to do maybe around the ballroom and other parts of the house. But this is not for the ballroom. The ballroom is being a tremendous amount of what’s being done with respect to the ballroom is for national security, including, as an example, a drone port on top of which was top secret until litigation made it less than top secret. But we have a drone port. We had. We have also we have the glass that’s four inches thick, bulletproof glass. We have bulletproof walls. We have things you need a place like this. But this is being made as a gift from me and other people that are great patriots that spent a lot of money. We’re building what will be the finest ballroom anywhere in the world. If they want to spend money on securing the White House, I think it would be very, very much a good expenditure. But the ballroom is being built.”
Gutierrez: “But what if Congress doesn’t sign off on the security money, sir?”
Trump: “Then the White House won’t be a very secure place.”
@NewsHour The payout procedure has to go before judge to see if valid and is for folks that did not commit a crime. What you failed to report is that some folks just went to thecapitol , after being escorted in by the Police, and simply walked around.
In the span of 48 hours, the U.S. government, acting on orders from the Trump Justice Department, did something no administration in American history has ever done before.
The agency created a nearly $1.8 billion fund, drawn from taxpayer money, designed to compensate allies of the president who claim they were mistreated by the Biden Justice Department.
Then, the administration permanently banned the IRS from ever examining President Donald Trump's prior tax returns or those of his sons, his company, or any affiliated trust. That move was quietly announced a day later.
Former IRS Commissioner John Koskinen reacts to these developments. Watch @GeoffRBennett's interview with him.
@SenWhitehouse Trump is the most targeted person in the world, the totally fake unfair lawfare that was waged against him was the reason I voted for him
Nearly $1.8 billion in taxpayer money cannot be moved into a new DOJ fund without clear legal authority, defined eligibility standards, or oversight.
The American people deserve to know where the money is coming from, who may receive payments from it, and what safeguards exist to protect taxpayers.
Yesterday, I called on DOJ to provide those answers.
And today, I introduced the Bipartisan Transparency for American Taxpayers Act with @RepTomSuozzi to ensure federal funds cannot be used for the “Anti-Weaponization Fund”.
Taxpayer dollars will never be turned into a discretionary payout fund. Transparency is not optional. Accountability is not negotiable.
🔗: fitzpatrick.house.gov/2026/5/fitzpat…
I joined @jaketapper to discuss—watch below ⬇️: