levels 🏹

14.1K posts

levels 🏹 banner
levels 🏹

levels 🏹

@lvls_x

pushing boundaries

Katılım Şubat 2018
604 Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
the more i use ai, the less i ask it to output
English
0
0
2
256
kidponga
kidponga@kidponga·
wow solana bros fighting with the hl bros over fuckall My advice to everyone involved, be the stoic border collie, not the ragebaited doberman and the easy way to to this is look at the chart of the token of your respective network
kidponga tweet media
English
1
2
7
1.2K
levels 🏹 retweetledi
Delphi Digital
Delphi Digital@Delphi_Digital·
Not all private AI is the same. Most products commit to a single privacy approach and apply it to every prompt. @AskVenice is one of the few consumer AI products with four privacy modes users can choose between. Anonymous proxies you to frontier closed labs without your identity. Private routes to open-source models outside the closed labs. TEE runs inference inside sealed hardware enclaves that the GPU host can't read into. E2EE adds client-side encryption so Venice itself only sees ciphertext. The higher modes change the nature of the guarantee. Anonymous and Private still leave someone in the chain able to read what you sent. TEE and E2EE shift the guarantee from trust in the operator to hardware enforcement. Even under compulsion, the GPU host has nothing readable to hand over. Different prompts need different levels of privacy. Letting users pick per request means privacy can match the prompt instead of being one-size-fits-all. Venice's recent subscription growth suggests there's real demand for this approach.
Delphi Digital tweet media
English
7
16
58
15.6K
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
a bit early to say but it sure feels like it
English
0
0
0
126
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
observ another explosive chart
levels 🏹 tweet media
English
1
0
9
801
Andrew Kang
Andrew Kang@Rewkang·
Proud to announce my position as CEO of @RoboStrategy. When I initially started looking into investing in robotics 2 years ago most VCs I consulted with recommended not to invest in the space. Robotics companies at this time did not have an easy time raising capital. The industry didn’t have a track record of big venture winners, was perceived to be challenging for a variety of reasons, and was not well understood. But it was clear to me that the rate of acceleration of physical AI development would dramatically change the industry. I invested $19m into FigureAI as my first investment. I believed it was a question of when, not if we could imbue machines around the world with physical intelligence. To accomplish this, the industry would need a tremendous amount of capital to grow, and also an investment firm that deeply understood the needs of robotics/physical AI companies so that it could build a platform to better support them. It will take hundreds of billions to capitalize the mechanized future meaning there is a big gap in the market. We decided we wanted to fill it. Previously, Mechanism Capital had never taken outside capital, but to do this at the scale I envision, I would need to do so. However, the private markets don’t have that scale. The public markets do, and it was clear that there is and likely will be tremendous appetite for public market investors to participate in the immense value creation happening in AI & robotics that only private market investors currently have the privilege of accessing. The explosive growth of AI companies is a precursor of what will happen in physical AI. So in 2025, we founded RoboStrategy and a year later, we took it public on Nasdaq. Throughout this year, we’ve assembled a great portfolio, started leading rounds of some amazing companies, and have built the foundation to be ready to scale to the next level after going public. We look different from a traditional VC firm in ways that founders appreciate. Our structure as a closed end fund means our capital is permanent - no fund life meaning we can invest with extremely long time horizons. Our investment firm also of course needs to have deep industry and research experience so that it can make the best risk reward optimized investment decisions. In the last year, we’ve brought on some truly exceptional robotics industry veterans who have previously served for decades as founders/operators. Many founders we talk to consider us as the most sophisticated venture capital firm they’ve talked to and we only intend to grow our expertise in the industry. RoboStrategy’s success depends on our ability to distribute the fund and capture maximal mindshare. This plays to our team’s strength in digital marketing and social media. We’re building a special marketing engine that serves as an attention amplifier for both us and our founders so that our products and stories can reach more people. A source of inspiration for our fund structure, Strategy (MSTR) raised tens of billions from public capital markets to invest in Bitcoin. I believe robotics will be a much larger industry than Bitcoin and the asset class is orders of magnitude less accessible. We are aiming to raise more and not only become the largest robotics investor globally, but also one of the largest venture capital funds in the world. Venture capital has traditionally been restricted to a limited group of investors. We are changing the paradigm and bringing it to the rest of the world. Be sure to follow @RoboStrategy. Job’s not finished.
RoboStrategy@RoboStrategy

BOT: Public Market Access to Private Robotics Companies Introducing RoboStrategy: RoboStrategy, Inc. (Nasdaq: BOT) is a closed-end management investment company providing concentrated exposure to robotics and physical AI. The fund is designed to give public market investors exposure to a portfolio that aims to include the most promising private, pre-IPO, and public robotics and physical AI companies. It bridges a structural gap between where robotics innovation is occurring (largely in private markets) and where most investors can access exposure (public markets). The fund seeks to provide investors with access to a sector that has traditionally been limited to venture capital, and aims to provide exposure to companies that may stay private for longer. -- The Core Insight We believe the robotics industry is at an inflection point, with physical AI and robotics increasingly being applied to labor-constrained global industries such as manufacturing, logistics, and services. According to the International Labor Association, labor accounts for approximately 52% of global GDP.¹ According to Statista, global GDP in 2025 was $118T.² This represents an implied global labor market size of roughly $60T. At the same time, this labor base is increasingly constrained: Korn Ferry projects a global shortage of 85.2 million skilled workers by 2030, including a 7.9 million worker deficit in manufacturing alone.³ Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute estimate the US could need 3.8 million new manufacturing workers by 2033, with 1.9 million of those roles at risk of going unfilled.⁴ Physical AI and robotics are emerging as a primary means of closing that gap. While public markets currently offer indirect exposure to robotics through diversified technology companies, much of the value creation is occurring in private companies that remain inaccessible to most investors. -- Portfolio Focus The portfolio focuses on what the fund believes are category-defining robotics and physical artificial intelligence innovators, including Figure AI, Apptronik, Dyna Robotics, Standard Bots, Dexmate, and other pioneers advancing autonomous systems, machine perception, and human-machine collaboration. The managers of the fund seek to optimize returns by actively managing the portfolio and continuing to make new investments in leading private robotics companies. -- The Ambition The fund's long-term goal is to grow into a significant public-market vehicle for robotics investing, providing public-market access to private innovation in the sector. -- Footnotes & Disclosure: ¹ International Labour Organization, World Employment and Social Outlook: May 2025 Update. ilo.org/sites/default/… ² Statista, Gross domestic product (GDP) in current prices worldwide. statista.com/statistics/268… ³ Korn Ferry, Future of Work: The Global Talent Crunch. kornferry.com/about-us/press… ⁴ Deloitte & The Manufacturing Institute, Taking charge: Manufacturers support growth with active workforce strategies, April 2024. www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/ab… RoboStrategy, Inc. (Nasdaq: BOT) is a closed-end fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to buy or sell securities. Investing involves substantial risks, including possible loss of principal. The fund invests in robotics, physical AI, emerging technologies, and private companies, which may involve heightened volatility, limited liquidity, valuation uncertainty, and concentration risk. References to portfolio companies are illustrative only, do not represent all investments made by the fund, and are not investment recommendations. Portfolio holdings are subject to change. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. See the prospectus and SEC filings for additional information.

English
191
73
1.2K
336.9K
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
@gdb i have no idea what any of this means but i trust you bro
English
0
0
0
87
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
the bookmarking era is really the cherry on top of the attention cycle for the last few months, almost every ai slop post has received more bookmarks than likes “ain’t nobody got time to read that shit but imma save it so my future self can bust his ass”
English
1
0
5
310
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
@_zkmike okay let’s hear it, what are we talking about here
English
1
0
1
211
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
i do miss being a reply guy, maybe this private account thing is a phase
English
0
0
13
451
Rhino
Rhino@lBattleRhino·
Once again you are filled with glorious purpose and the boundless love of all creation
English
10
5
244
12.4K
levels 🏹
levels 🏹@lvls_x·
@BreakingBadBall we just don’t talk about the ones that failed missing is also fine and very common, but dealing with that is fairly well published come to think of it, it is interesting that most people learn how to NOT fail, but very few try to learn how to win
English
0
0
1
39
Fut_Warrior
Fut_Warrior@BreakingBadBall·
@lvls_x It really is incredible to me that whenever you size into something I don’t think you’ve ever missed
English
1
0
1
45