
mjayFacts
46 posts

mjayFacts
@mJayfacts
Author of:The Truth behind the False Michael Jackson Allegations |published in 2018 | one of the 1st to break the truth with facts
Katılım Ocak 2019
4 Takip Edilen332 Takipçiler

HORRIBLE and I LOVE his content. It was extremely soft like ridiculously soft for what @piersmorgan is known for. For one this was 33 mins when most of his interviews are an hour+, Tom was great as usual but was not apart of the panel. A billion points that I know Piers knows were left out, it looked and felt very much like a we have to do this video just because we will be getting tons of traffic from jumping on this bandwagon because the documentary is trending. You can tell Piers was not invested at all. @PiersUncensored #PiersUncensored
English

If money wasn't the motive we would never hear this hot garbage. What's your take on this intetview @Zigmanfreud? youtu.be/2jVJwJpqlxM?si…

YouTube
English

I understand my way of defending Michael Jackson is unorthodox but it works for me. I’ll tell it how it is. I will not beat around the bush. I am not a fan of Michael Jackson’s. Yes he has great music and he’s an icon, but I’m into 90s rap his music is just not my style. I understand why people think Michael Jackson is guilty I understand that Michael Jackson kinda brought alot of these claims onto himself his team is partly responsible but again I am understanding no one can say no to him . Just because someone is considered odd doesn’t make them a pedophile but that being said I wanted to know the truth I did my research now it’s time for the world to see the truth.
English

No it’s definitely a documentary but a very poorly made one sided one. I’m so tired of these MJ fans being delusional. Call it for what it is. It’s labeled on Netflix as a documentary eveyone is saying it’s documentary. This is coming from someone in film it’s filmed as a documentary. Canceling Netflix is not going to stop this doc from airing. Not calling it a documentary is not going to make this doc any less famous. If you have proper facts which I do you can acknowledge all of it with confidence.
English

@mJayfacts stop calling it a documentary
it's just a TV show with the usual propaganda tricks
English

Michael Jackson Investigation, which
spanned from 1993 to 2009 and involved multiple law enforcement agencies. Below is a list of
agencies and FBI divisions that investigated Michael Jackson—and all found zero evidence
of any wrongdoing:
FBI: Engineering Research Facility Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory (RCFL)
FBI: Investigation Technology Division
Los Angeles Police Department
Legat London
FBI: Video Analysis
FBI: Forensic Audio Video Imaging Analysis Unit
FBI: Advice on Prosecution Strategies
FBI: Advice on Interview Strategies
FBI: Advice on Expert Testimonies
FBI: Request for Forensic Guidance
National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime
Behavioral Analysis Unit-3
Behavioral Sciences
Computer Analysis and Response Team (CART)
Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM)
FBI (Ventura)
Crimes Against Children Unit (CACU)
Victim Witness Unit
FBI Lab
Department of Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS)
Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG)
FBI: Automated Case Management
System (ACMS)
FBI: Privacy Impact Assessment
FBI: Los Angeles Division - Consideration of Potential Federal Allegation
FBI: New York and Miami Divisions
Santa Barbara County Sheriff's
Department (SBSD)
Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office Laboratory
Santa Barbara County Criminal
Investigations - Sheriff/Coroner
Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office
Santa Barbara County Investigation and Prosecution
All agencies found zero evidence
English

Unfortunately the film is on Netflix this film is going to go viral and more people will watch it than leaving Neverland which was on HBO and we remember how big that got. There is nothing we can do but embrace for impact. Unsubscribing to Netflix, not watching the film, not talking about the doc will not do anything to Netflix or the popularity that this will doc will create
English

@mJayfacts @DiDimond I understand where you're coming from. My concern is that giving this film more attention will only make them more viral, and many people will ignore the facts and focus on attacking Michael. That's why I think it's best to ignore them for now
English

On episode 3 of the #netflix documentary #theverdict
If these books are child porn @DiDimond why do you have them at your house in your pool room? You have child porn in your house?!?

English

Wait what no one out of the fandom knows who she is?!? She’s one of the biggest journalists tv hosts of the 90s and 2000s and if not that everyone knows who she is now because of Netflix. I’m not giving her a reaction for being a great journalist I’m calling her out for possession of said child porn why would you want me to be quite about that?
English

@mJayfacts @DiDimond I do see your point, and you're right, but it's not really relevant since no one outside the fandom knows who she is. We shouldn't give them the reaction they're looking for.
English

I’m fucking dying 😭☠️😂😂😂😂
Justice For MJ's CSA Survivors@MJTruthSeeker7
@mJayfacts @DiDimond A journalist possessing case artifacts for research is not the same as a man who shares beds with boys keeping them locked in his private bedroom cabinet right next to his porn. Unlike MJ, Diane did not write a romantic note in one of the books about the "spirit of Boyhood."
English

@vivicenza @DiDimond If you did 3 mins of research you will see that these books that were found in Michael’s room are labeled child porn (they are not) but it’s Diane diamond that keeps pushing these books as child porn. So why does she have child porn at her house?
English

@mJayfacts @DiDimond Donc si Jackson les avaient chez lui c’est pas grave car c’est pas un pedophile mais si elle décide de garder tout les elements de l’enquête ça l’accuse elle ? Ca va pas dans vos tête
Français

@Dinorah_Diana01 @DiDimond No this is impotent and I’m shocked you don’t see my point. The double standard with MJ is pathetic. If this is child porn to him why isn’t it to her? It’s a simple question no one can answer
English

@mJayfacts @DiDimond STOP GIVING THEM THE ATTENTION THEY ARE LOOKING FOR. SHUT UP PLEASE.
English

@mandyandtrish1 I know, more importantly though it’s a book that is mostly about single fathers Which Michael Jackson was. This book covers how to raise boy children
English

@mJayfacts What’s funny is the book she’s holding ain’t even child porn is a coffee table art book if u actually look it up you will know the book ain’t child porn
English

I’m loosing brain cells HOW DOES ONE CLAIM THIS IS CHILD PORN AND CASUALLY SHOW IT. IF ITS CHILD PORN FOR MICHAEL JSCKSON WHY ISNT IT CHILD PORN FOR YOU?! Raid her
mjayFacts@mJayfacts
On episode 3 of the #netflix documentary #theverdict If these books are child porn @DiDimond why do you have them at your house in your pool room? You have child porn in your house?!?
English

@sandramar_smss I’ve reached out to the publisher to see if I can get more this was back on 2018 but I’ll be uploading the pdf here FOR FREE very soon so keep an eye out
English

@mJayfacts Eu adoraria receber um exemplar do seu livro.
Português

All these people saying they are unsubscribing to Netflix and not watching this Michael Jackson #theverdict doc ….. You not watching the doc isn’t going to bankrupt Netflix. If you defend Michael Jackson you need to watch it. In 2018 when the first 10 people including myself started unearthing the documents in the #mjfam tag we were the first to have actual facts and evidence on every point made on the Michael Jackson allegations. And anyone can say anything at any time we had actual evidence,without any delay. You can not possibly do that if you didn’t watch the documentary and you will damage your credibility. The best part of the facts we presented over the year is actually changing people’s minds on these allegations and that’s the approach
English

Absolutely. Another important point to ad is that there is only 5 accusers but Michael Jackson was around thousands of kids for years. A ped***. Doesn’t attack once every 10 years when they have access to that many children, additionally there was not ONE parent that did the right thing and go after him criminally. NOT ONE
English

@mJayfacts any parent who thought their child was violated would seek criminal charges over money. The fact that they sought money first told the real story!
English

@SusieJohn3311 @svtppyopuli Thank you for adding this, I remember hearing he was notorious for this but didn’t remember where I heard that. You are right it was the trial
English

@mJayfacts @svtppyopuli There were several witnesses at the trial who testified that the Arvizos would rummage through their things when they stayed at their house. They were pretty much the house guests from hell.
English

@Netflix4MJ Making an account about a Netflix documentary you are not getting paid for is yelling 50 year old virgin 🤡
English

