Mad Carew

In 1946 the British government introduced free school milk for every child in the country. One third of a pint, every school day, from the age of five to the age of fifteen. The milk was whole. Full-fat. From British dairy herds. It was delivered to the school gate in small glass bottles with foil caps and left on the doorstep in metal crates, where it sat in the sun until morning break if the weather was warm and developed a slightly suspect taste that an entire generation of British adults can still describe with uncomfortable precision. The generation that grew up on school milk was, by every anthropometric measure, the healthiest generation of British children ever recorded. Average height increased. Bone density improved. Dental health, despite the sugar in everything else, improved. Iron deficiency rates among school-age children dropped. The growth charts that the Ministry of Health had been keeping since the war showed a consistent, measurable, year-on-year improvement that tracked precisely onto the introduction of the milk programme. In 1971 Margaret Thatcher, then Education Secretary, cut free school milk for children over seven. The tabloids called her Thatcher the Milk Snatcher. She was vilified. She kept the policy. The next generation of British children, the ones who grew up without the daily third of a pint, were measurably less healthy than the one before. The growth charts show it. The dental records show it. The conscription medicals, while they lasted, showed it. The thing the milk had been providing, the calcium, the vitamin D, the vitamin A, the complete amino acid profile, the conjugated linoleic acid, the fat-soluble nutrients that a growing skeleton requires in order to reach its genetic potential, was no longer arriving at morning break in a glass bottle with a foil cap. It was replaced, eventually, by nothing. Or by a carton of fruit juice. Or by a packet of crisps from the vending machine that appeared in the school corridor in the 1990s. The generation that drank the milk is now in its seventies and eighties. They are, on average, taller, stronger-boned, and longer-lived than the generation that came after them. The milk was not magic. The milk was milk. It was the thing the body needed, delivered at the time the body needed it, at a cost the government considered acceptable until it didn't. The cost of not providing it has been rather higher.

UK Muslim Murder House: 41 Dogs Starved, Tortured, Murdered They tried to chew their own legs off they were so hungry. How can any human do this? UPDATE: We are now finding out there was a cover-up (read until end). This is the nightmare that unfolded at the fake “Save A Paw UK” rescue in Crays Hill, Essex. In February police smashed their way in and found pure hell: 41 dogs rotting in a mass grave crawling with maggots and rats, 21 more live dogs and one cat crammed into filthy pens with zero food or water. The smell of death hit vets from 40 metres away. Starved animals had gnawed on wood, on their own legs, anything to survive. Most were already dead. 26-year-old Muslim Oaveed Rahman ran the scam. He lured desperate British families on Gumtree and social media, pocketed up to £500 per dog with promises of training and loving new homes, then vanished. He admitted 11 fraud charges, animal cruelty, and illegally owning a banned XL Bully. On 20 February 2026 the court gave him just five years in prison and a lifetime ban on ever owning animals again. You may have seen the original horror. Now fresh details make it even worse. UPDATE: Public fury forced an MP to refer the “unduly lenient” sentence to the Attorney General. On 25 February they reviewed it and refused to toughen it - keeping the soft five-year term exactly as it was, even while calling the crimes “repellent.” At the same time Basildon Council quietly released its own damning report: they had received repeated complaints about Rahman’s property since early 2023 - noise, distressed dogs, suspicious activity - yet did almost nothing. No proper inspections, no shutdown, just endless excuses that “no licensing was required.” Officials knew the horror was coming and looked the other way. Why do you think they covered it up? This preventable massacre happened while Rahman, shaped by Islamic teachings that brand dogs najis (unclean) and ritually impure, turned trusting owners’ pets into a death camp. The pathetic sentence, the council’s years of inaction, and the obvious cultural clash feel like a slap in the face to every victim and every dog lover in Britain. When will authorities stop turning a blind eye and finally confront how these imported attitudes treat our loyal companions like vermin? He deserves the death penalty.

As far as I'm concerned, all new out-of-town housing developments should be opposed. They're building large estates in the middle of nowhere with no access to anything except by car, without corresponding infrastructure. These housing estates have no purpose except as middle class dormitories for those escaping the cities. What we need to do is reclaim our cities. We have some of the lowest urban density in Europe. There are plenty of brilliant candidates for development here. Bradford, Dewsbury, Huddersfield and Hull. These town centres have stunning architecture and access to rail networks within walking distance. If your starting point is in Bradford city centre, you can be in Leeds or Manchester inside an hour. Successive local administrations have attempted to revive the city centres as retail centres, but the old model is dead and it's not coming back so we need to give our town centres a new purpose. If you walk around Bradford, you will see that a lot of buildings would be stunning if they were just cleaned up a bit, and that most of the buildings above the vape shops are empty. As I understand it, the reason they're not redeveloped is because VAT rules kick in and they don't recover what's invested - but here is a stock of what could be amazing apartments. You could go one further and pull down the old shopping mall and turn it into a city park and turn some of the old mills on the outskirts into schools. The obvious sticking point here is that you won't get people moving into towns when towns are full of foreigners. The ONLY reason we're building housing estates in the middle of nowhere is because white people want to get away from brown people so they can raise their kids in a safe and familiar environment. As such, any housing policy has to be coupled with a programme of remigration. There are at least 8m people in Britain who should not be here, who contribute nothing to the economic and social life of the country, and it's because of them that towns are becoming uninhabitable. That's the reason we're paving over the countryside. This is also the reason new housing developments should be opposed. Every new estate built on green belt is a surrender. We are ceding territory to third worlders and enabling colonisation. It wouldn't even be so bad if these new houses were big enough for white couples to raise families, but instead we're building cramped little boxes with no storage and no room for kids. They could be living in large apartments in safe, modern, clean city spaces with access to everything on their doorsteps, but instead we're consigning our own people to the drudgery of modern housing estates and endless daily commutes into the cities. Right now, though, residential developments in cities compromise of enormous dreary filing cabinets and "luxury" student apartments, with no character diversity of design. Everywhere looks the same, and everyone is reduced to being an economic unit. These places are anti-human. City living can be family friendly. We've done it before. Bath in Somerset is the model to follow (before the Lib Dems screwed it up). You have low rise apartment buildings and handsome Georgian streets lines with trees. It's great for social living, and if you live there, you don't really need a car because you have everything in town and easy access to London and Bristol. I cherished my time there because it was pleasant and safe. I see no reason why Halifax and Bradford can't be the same. Halifax could easily be the Bath of the North. A prerequisite though, is to clear the streets of the mentally ill, the homeless and the addicts. Make towns safe, affordable and clean, and you won't have any problems populating them. Provide schools and green spaces, and decent under street parking and soon you will have a thriving urban hometown. Right now we're seeing most of our villages being eroded by modern developments, because anyone who can afford to escape will do so. But it's not country life people seek. People are just looking for familiarity and safety. There's no reason why our mid-sized towns and cities can't provide this. We just need to reclaim them from the orcs.