(b)rat

38.1K posts

(b)rat banner
(b)rat

(b)rat

@mandysux

It's not my fault you're like in love with me 💋

Katılım Temmuz 2010
813 Takip Edilen999 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
(b)rat
(b)rat@mandysux·
Cuando comprendes que toda opinión es una visión cargada de historia personal, empiezas a comprender que todo juicio es una confesión.
Español
0
0
1
558
(b)rat retweetledi
mar
mar@twforevahyjb·
ni pedo pumas, valieron madres
Español
0
1
0
134
(b)rat
(b)rat@mandysux·
Que pinches nacotes la vdd
Español
0
0
0
7
(b)rat retweetledi
Ryan Hart
Ryan Hart@thisdudelikesAI·
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
Ryan Hart tweet media
English
614
9.9K
36.3K
10.1M
(b)rat
(b)rat@mandysux·
Violenté (con la mirada) a un empleado del SAT pero al menos obtuve mi firma electrónica
Español
0
0
0
28
(b)rat retweetledi
𝜗𝜚
𝜗𝜚@bamboleoblvd·
definitivamente había ALGO en el aire de México en los dos mil…
𝜗𝜚 tweet media
Español
114
5.4K
35K
1.2M
(b)rat retweetledi
A L e 𝕏
A L e 𝕏@l0rdAlexX·
Yo cada vez que veo un puente peatonal pintado de morado:
A L e 𝕏 tweet media
Español
31
1K
9.2K
109.5K
(b)rat
(b)rat@mandysux·
Así me sentí dándole a mi jefe y a mi equipo mi 2 week notice
GIF
Español
0
0
0
27
(b)rat retweetledi
ּ ֶָ
ּ ֶָ@nubedemarzo·
Oficialmente terminé sex & the city. Sigo pensando en esta pareja y en lo mucho que me conmovió, creo que nunca me han amado.
Español
52
3.3K
55.1K
1.5M
(b)rat retweetledi
゛ ☆ .ᐟ ⋆
゛ ☆ .ᐟ ⋆@veinIuvr·
and for the lady, perhaps a fucking break
English
80
63.8K
261.2K
3.2M
(b)rat retweetledi
danny⭑𓏲ּ𝄢
danny⭑𓏲ּ𝄢@PatricioEs55871·
Telehit pasaba joyas como esta todos los días y nosotros nunca dimensionamos la suerte que teníamos.
Español
27
1.3K
7.7K
116.5K
(b)rat retweetledi
(b)rat retweetledi
Tania Tagle
Tania Tagle@Tania_Tagle·
mis nuevas ídolas son las morritas que van al gimnasio a usar los aparatos para hacer rutinas de pilates reformer, enojan a los gym bros, desconciertan a los instructores y se ahorran como 400 pesos por sesión
Español
13
189
13K
257.7K
(b)rat retweetledi
Swiftie Mexicana 🇲🇽
Swiftie Mexicana 🇲🇽@LaTayMexicana·
Y mientras caía la tormenta que inundaba las calles moradas de la Ciudad de México no pude evitar preguntarme ¿para sobrevivir en la metrópoli que se hunde deberíamos ser ajolotes?
Swiftie Mexicana 🇲🇽 tweet media
Español
24
1.6K
7K
87.3K
(b)rat retweetledi
carlos buburrón
carlos buburrón@CBuburron·
veces que la presidenta ha invitado a bts a reunirse con ella en palacio nacional: 1 veces que la presidenta ha invitado a colectivos de búsqueda a reunirse con ella en palacio nacional: 0
REFORMA@Reforma

#Mañanera ¡Atención ARMY! Llega BTS a Palacio Nacional. @Claudiashein informó que el grupo musical de Corea viene a las 17:00 horas y se abrirá el balcón para que puedan saludar a fans. reforma.com 📹Especial

Español
82
7.3K
31.9K
436.4K