Marc Boe ن

@prgrssv_raccoon @sadd42869 @BrianAtlas @Demosthenes555 Well. Yes, they are. Maybe not 20 yo, because women consider them to be too immature, but sure, with very rare exceptions a 30 yo is much more valuable for a woman than a 50 yo. You tried to make a point here and failed miserably.

@sadd42869 @BrianAtlas @Demosthenes555 And by that logic. Younger men are more valuable and fertile than gross old ones. Sperm degrades, hairlines recede, balls fall.

Alysa Liu without makeup. Makeup should be criminalized.

"Healthy attraction naturally moves with age." Citation needed. Why would a 40 yo prefer a 40 yo woman over a young one? Also: When has there ever been a time in human history where young women were not considered highly attractive? You talk like this is something new when it's basically been that way forever. And funny that somehow it's totally okay for women to feel attracted to young men, but not okay for men to like young women. 🤦🏻‍♂️

The issue isn’t her legal status. The issue is what it says about our culture when older men publicly fixate on the youngest possible legal women. Healthy attraction naturally moves with age. When losers like @BrianAtlas normalizes older men chasing the youngest legal threshold, we create a culture where young women are perpetually seen as prey, not equals. Not to mention young women want young men. Not old wrinkly balls. Get a grip.

She can in pretty much any other country than the US. The US is the only nation with that weird 21 age limit for drinking. Everywhere else 18 is the legal age for drinking. Actually, in many places even 16 for beer and 18 for liquor. I think the only places outside the US where a 20 yo isn't allowed to drink are Arab countries, as they prohibit alcohol in general for everyone.

@user54907 @BrianAtlas Just the ones that can't legally drink

Because it's not. Sorry, but you are massively misinformed here. You are NOT allowed to have sex with a 14 yo AS AN ADULT. 14 years is the age of consent, IF the other person is NOT an adult yet. So two teenagers, say 14 and 16 yo, can legally have intercourse. An adult and a teenager can NOT legally have intercourse. German law prohibits that. Just as it is in the US with the Romeo and Juliet Law.

@Roter_Gamer Why is it legal to rape kids in Germany?

The age of consent in your country of Germany is 14 years old.

No it's not. I'm pretty sure that it's not against the law in the US when two 15 yo have sex with each other. 14 is the age of consent in Germany IF the other one is not an adult. Meaning: 14 yo has sex with 14 yo = legal 14 yo has sex with 25 yo = illegal Just as it is in most US states.

@AP4Liberty Well 14+ the age of the victims in the so called pedophile ring. Is Germany a country that condones pedophilia so much they made it law? Most states in the US it’s 18.

@Goysterfahrer @DeutscherSozPat @JurgenElsasser @EvaVlaar Was natürlich das mit Abstand wichtigste ist. Lieber Hungertod als Regenbogen! So nämlich! 🤡

@DeutscherSozPat @JurgenElsasser @EvaVlaar Dritte Welt gibt es nur 2 Geschlechter.

Ist ja ekelhaft! CPAC in Ungarn, ein Treffen der europäischen Fake-Patrioten, mit US-Hymne und einer Video-Ansprache von #Netanyahu. Damit gefährdet CPAC-Schirmherr #Orban seinen Wahlsieg. Und @EvaVlaar hat auch ihren Ruf ruiniert... Diese Konferenz ist der Aufmarsch der amerikanischen und zionistischen Kriegstreiber – unserer Feinde!

@ValentinoUK @JurgenElsasser Verärgert, dass Amerika nun mal doch die wesentlich stärkere Faust hat als Mutter Russland?

@JurgenElsasser @EvaVlaar Das hätte man nicht einfach ausblenden dürfen. Politik nach dem Prinzip des Faustrechts kann man nicht ernsthaft als akzeptabel oder herzlich willkommen darstellen.

@JurgenElsasser @EvaVlaar Könnte daran liegen, dass das C in CPAC nicht für Communism steht. Drittweltistische Kommunisten wie Sie sind nicht die Zielgruppe dieser Veranstaltung, Herr Elsässer.

@FunkyTramp @Patrick_Proemer Perfekt auf den Punkt gebracht! 💯

@Patrick_Proemer Noch eine Anmerkung, warum es Stärke braucht. Friede ist ähnlich wie in der Landwirtschaft ein Ergebnis des Kultivieren. Kultivieren heisst pflegen und veredeln, also künstlich das Erwünschte mit Kraft durchzusetzen.

Mehr gibt’s dazu nicht zu sagen!!!

They'll go from "Jews are facilitating mass immigration" to "the Jews are too anti immigration" in an instant with zero shame. Such lazy slop. The fact that some people are falling for them is indicative of the incredible brain rot infecting society.

🚩Zeit, den Mythos vom Diktator-Shah potenziert von Amnesty International zu enthüllen und zu begraben! Die Wahrheit über den Iran Briefing Paper No. 7 von Amnesty International: Nichts als Hörensagen Die Welt hat den Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi als brutalen Diktator abgestempelt – mit Folter durch die SAVAK, Massenmorden und Unterdrückung. Und wer hat das weltweit verbreitet? Amnesty International mit ihrem "Iran Briefing Paper No 7" aus November 1976. Aber: Die gesamte Berichterstattung basiert nur auf Hörensagen! Keine Bilder, kein Filmmaterial, kein einziger Besuch von Amnesty-Mitgliedern vor Ort. Der Report stützt sich ausschließlich auf Aussagen von Ex-Häftlingen, Exil-Iranern, Familien von Gefangenen und Journalisten viele davon potenziell verbittert oder biased. Die Behauptungen von systematischen Foltern, Massenmorden und Diktatur? Alles unbewiesen, nur Worte ohne greifbare Evidenz. Amnesty hat damit eine beste Arbeit geleistet, um ein Regime zu helfen zu stürzen es war purer Bait zum Sturz von Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, der den Weg für die Revolution 1979 ebnete.

Let's talk about the opening part of this statement: "nobody is illegal on stolen land." We can break it down, but we should also know what it is. What we are looking at is Chinese-style political sloganeering called "tifa" (提法). Communist communications ever since Mao took over China (and the CCP before that) almost always follow this kind of formulation, called 提法 (tífǎ), which literally translates as "watchwords" or "slogans." Literally, it means to lift up or present or highlight the core message or political principle in play through a charged slogan. The purpose of the sloganeering is actually to do a kind of political engineering through carefully selected and weaponized words that are easily memorable and that hijack the critical thinking faculties of the people who both hear and repeat them so they'll advance the Party line. You can think of tifa quite literally as a form of "discourse engineering" with the intent of doing political engineering or political warfare more or less by hijacking people's brains through mystifying slogans. (Mystification is like a more powerful form of confusion, akin to having been put under a spell.) In his amazing analysis of the CCP in the early 1950s, just after Mao took power (in October 1949), psychologist Robert Jay Lifton referred to what amounts to tifa as "thought-terminating clichés." That is, they're slogans (or clichés) that have the power to turn off your ability to think clearly about what's being said and implied and to just go along with the political messaging rather than to question it. The mechanisms of these political warfare tools are mystification and rhetorical entrapment. Mystification is overriding critical thinking with carefully constructed falsehoods and framing. Rhetorical entrapment occurs when there's no easy way to disagree with the framing (think, "black lives matter" or "Christ is king" (as the Groypers use it), both of which are examples of tifa). The mystification part is a process of using carefully constructed falsehoods presented as truisms that undermine the critical thinking process. That is, the statements can be seen as "obviously" true in a particular way that disguises how they are false in another way. For example, black lives obviously matter, but supporting the organization is something people should not do. The statement "nobody is illegal on stolen land" is very sophisticated as tifa because it contains three mystifications in just six words: 1) "Nobody is illegal" confuses the distinction between being a human being of basic human dignity and being a citizen of a country or legal visitor there; 2) "Stolen land" confuses the legitimacy of the country in question; 3) The idea of being able to be legal or illegal if the country itself is not legal because it is "stolen land." This is distinct from the idea of the land itself being stolen because it conceptually bridges the concept of legality and legitimacy of the country. As you can tell, breaking down and explaining the failures of all three parts of this mystification (demystification) is both challenging and exhausting, and it takes so much space that most people will not engage with it due to its length (which will be three orders of magnitude greater (5000-6000 words) than the tifa itself (6 words) to explicate fully and two orders of magnitude greater (600-800 words) just to barely articulate). Raise these by another order of magnitude of effort or two for the argument that will follow the attempt to demystify. The point is that to fully engage a six-word tifa through explanation, discussion, and argument to try to break someone free of it might take 50-100 thousand words worth of effort by the time all is said and done. (Another example: "trans women are women"; look how much effort that one has taken!) This example of tifa also contains two rhetorical traps that derive from the first two mystifications: A) It dares critics to say that people themselves are illegal (illegitimate) because of a political circumstance, thus replacing a legalistic fact with a moral assertion, one that is difficult to litigate without considerable expertise and that might still lose on emotional appeal ("empathy"); B) It lures critics into litigating the legality of the establishment of the nation in question, which undermines the justified presumption of authority in the national concept. These rhetorical traps not only put critics in a bad, weak, and likely losing position from the start, but they also invite adopting a reactionary or chauvinistic stance as the only possible reply (e.g., "we aren't colonizers; we're conquerors" or "illegals are illegitimate"). This feeds the strategic principle of "your target's reaction is your real action" upon which these manipulative movements gain the most ground. In short, tifa like this hijacks the capacity to understand the situation correctly in a succinct, repeatable phrase even Billie Eilish can repeat in about a second and a half (confuses and mystifies) while arranging a sophisticated psychological and public opinion trap that is mostly lose-lose-lose for those who would object. Notice that through the application of tifa as a form of political warfare (public opinion warfare, specifically), any idiot (including the average Billie Eilish fan) can ensnare any good-faith actor in this very sophisticated political warfare device even without understanding in the slightest how it works, dragging them into either confusion or arguments meant to be fought on losing ground for the good-faith critic. You don't need a sophisticated political warfare operator to make this happen. Furthermore, notice that any idiot who falls for the tifa here will actually repeat it, making the slogan campaign viral so that it is mostly being fought out not by experts but by masses of laypeople who know there's a fight but who aren't properly equipped to deal with it. This is why it is an example of "public opinion warfare" as one of the CCP's "three warfares" doctrine styles. As summarized by the RAND Corporation: "Tifa have four identifying characteristics: (1) They are politically laden and stated verbatim, (2) they extend along a clear line of authority, (3) they are distributed to official party organs, and (4) they characterize or resolve a dialectical contradiction between competing ideas in the CCP." Engaging with this kind of slogan, as we must, brings critics into a "dialectical space" that's roughly on the level of the average idiot who can argue emotively or even just repeat the slogan as a kind of verbal cudgel (for those watching) rather than genuinely engaging. We might call this the "Reeeeee! Effect," and we all know it works very well. Tifa creates the "Reeeeee! Effect." Since the late 1960s, almost all "New Leftist" activism in the West runs on a Maoist-Marxist engine, including the heavy use of tifa sloganeering as a form of rhetorical and political warfare. Most of what we engage in today with their B.S. rhetoric is tifa. So these "thought-terminating clichés" (tifa) are very powerful and sophisticated political warfare tools that we all encounter every day. The only way to beat them is to identify them for the manipulations they are and explain them as best we can so that people are more likely to identify them and less likely to fall for them, and also to help people out of the ones they're already caught in and under the spell of.

Quatsch. Anarchismus ist eine Form von Libertarismus. Anarchismus ist einfach nur die radikalste Lesart des Libertarismus. „Anarcho-Kommunismus“ ist reine Traumtänzerei. Ohne gewaltsame Herrschaft ist es nicht möglich, zu verhindern, dass Menschen sich Eigentum aneignen und wieder zu Kapitalisten werden. Kommunismus ist auf zentralisierte Gewalt angewiesen.

@m3m3z1ll4 ne ist eindeutig rechts, das linke pendant sind Anarchisten

Und schwarzgepillte Heulsusen. GN

@duhrstloescher @m3m3z1ll4 Sprachverbote hören sich ziemlich rechts an mmn 🤷🏻‍♂️

@m3m3z1ll4 Homophobie und Ableismus hört sich schon ziemlich rechts an mmn

Der Bürger als Eigentum des Staates, der eine „Erlaubnis“ braucht, sich und sein Eigentum dem Zugriff zu entziehen. Der Totalitarismus kehrt zurück!

The Islamist paradox: talk about taking over the world proudly, but if you repeat what they say they turn victim and cry Islamophobia.

NIUS Exklusiv: Rund 45 Millionen Euro sind im vergangenen Jahr über „Demokratie leben!“ an sogenannte „Partnerschaften für Demokratie“ geflossen, die das Geld weiterverteilt haben. Wo es am Ende gelandet ist, weiß das Ministerium von @PrienKarin nicht. Obwohl die Ministerin eine „Ära der Transparenz“ angekündigt hatte, sollen die Empfänger erst ab 2026 erfasst werden. Ob die Millionen tatsächlich an Demokratie-Projekte geflossen sind, lässt sich so nicht nachverfolgen. Und das kommt dem Ministerium wohl gerade recht: Denn in der Vergangenheit hatten die „Partnerschaften für Demokratie“ die lokale Antifa finanziert und regelmäßig Wahlkampf für linke Parteien gemacht. nius.de/articles/demok…

1/3 The lesson of "regime change" in the past century has been that you should not generalize from one region to another. The lessons of Japan & Germany did not apply to the Middle East, for instance. Yet many of so-called "anti-war" commentators are making such false comparisons right now.

Die Weltordnung, in der der Islam ohne Gegenwehr europäische Gesellschaften unterwandert, in der westliche Regierungen mit dem totalitären Stil Chinas liebäugeln und sich den chinesischen Kommunisten an den Hals werfen; die Welt, in der Terrororganisationen hofiert werden, während sie ihren Vernichtungskrieg gegen Israel oder unsere eigene Infrastruktur führen - diese Welt erhält mit den USA unter Trump endlich eine Gegenwehr! Nicht überraschend, dass Sie das verstörend finden. Sie gehören ja zu den Zerstörern des freiheitlichen Westens.

@whysooserious17 @seriengruender Bringt nix. Ab 400.000€ wird Schenkungssteuer fällig.

@seriengruender Ich werde, NATÜRLICH auch schauen, dass ich meine Immobilie meinen Jungs überschreibe, aber vertraglich festzurre, dass ich bis zum Ende dort leben bleiben kann. So muss ich nichts vererben. Und wenn der Rest zu groß ist wird halt vorher bis zur Höchstgrenze verschenkt! :)

Gelebte Praxis in Südeuropa: Man schenkt sich ein Grundstück, spart diverse Steuern, und nach dem Notar überreicht ein neutraler Anwalt diskret einen dicken Umschlag mit Bargeld. Alle Beteiligten vergrößern ihr privates Vermögen, der Staat geht leer aus. So entstehen reiche Bürger in scheinbar armen Ländern.