marian ashley

Nis Devatha shares housewarming ceremony public video in Austin, Texas. How do H1Bs go from third world wages to buying million dollar homes in 3-6 years? Smoking gun. Mortgage scams, multiple jobs, visa violations. @USAmbIndia @USAndIndia @USCGHyderabad @SecRubio @VP @USLaborIG

Here it is: CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE! EDISON RESEARCH CONFIRMS STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN. DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. INCLUDING OVER 1 MILLION PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 📝BAN all voting machines.

HOW IS THIS HAPPENING IN TEXAS?!! A MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD OPERATIVE BUILDING A FULL ISLAMIC MINI-STATE WITH AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS??!!! WHAT THE LITERAL F#CK?!!🇺🇸🇺🇸👇👇

There is absolutely no reason Ajaykumar Patel should have ever been allowed to move here from India so that he could own two Subways in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and have two anchor babies. Democrat and Republican politicians have sold out Americans for their silver shekels while their own countrymen struggle to handle the effects of mass immigration. It’s absolutely shameful.

WE GIVE UP... SINCE THE INDIANA FEVER DOESN'T SEEM TO CARE ABOUT FIXING THEIR OWN PROBLEMS, WE DID IT FOR THEM. The Indiana Fever do not have a talent problem. They do not have a scoring problem. They do not even have a chemistry problem. They have an offensive governance problem. The wrong player is too often allowed to control the possession. The right player is too often removed from the action. One of the league’s most explosive scorers is being permitted to stand, wait and hunt her own shot instead of being coached into becoming the most dangerous off-ball weapon in basketball. The result is not elite offense. It is high-level talent playing sophisticated streetball. And after months of watching the same problems repeat themselves, the numbers now make the diagnosis impossible to ignore: The Indiana Fever are at their best when Caitlin Clark controls the offense and Kelsey Mitchell participates in it... not when Mitchell tries to become the offense herself. That is the problem. That is also the solution. Caitlin Clark Is Not Merely a Scorer. She Is the System. The most important number in this entire discussion is not points, field-goal percentage or three-point percentage. It is this: Indiana’s net rating with Caitlin Clark on the floor: +1.9 per 100 possessions Indiana’s net rating with Clark off the floor: -10.3 That is a 12.2-point swing. When Clark plays, the Fever function like a winning team. When she sits, they function like one of the worst teams in basketball. That is not the statistical profile of a player who should spend long stretches stationed away from the ball, waiting for the offense to find her. That is the profile of the player who should be directing every meaningful possession. Clark is not simply another high-volume guard. She is Indiana’s organizer, pressure release, transition engine and primary source of advantage creation. Her production reflects it. Per 36 minutes: 25.5 points 9.5 assists 4.8 rebounds Kelsey Mitchell, by comparison: 25.8 points 3.1 assists 1.7 rebounds Their scoring is nearly identical. Their influence on the game is not. Clark creates points for herself and everyone around her. Mitchell is overwhelmingly dependent upon scoring to create value. That distinction should determine the structure of the offense. Instead, Indiana too often treats the two as interchangeable ball-dominant guards. They are not. The Fever Are Confusing Shot-Making With Offensive Execution Indiana leads the league in scoring at 94.4 points per game. It ranks first in three-point percentage at 37.7% and third in overall field-goal percentage. On the surface, that appears to be proof of a highly functioning offense. It is not. The Fever rank only sixth in assists. That tells a very different story. Indiana is scoring because it has exceptional shot-makers... not because it is consistently producing elite possessions. There is a major difference. A disciplined offense creates repeatable advantages through spacing, screening, cutting, timing and ball movement. A talented but poorly governed offense survives because gifted players repeatedly make difficult shots. Indiana has been living too heavily in the second category. That is why the offense can look brilliant for one quarter and completely disjointed the next. It is why a player can score 30 points while contributing almost nothing else. It is why Clark can dominate one night and then spend critical possessions removed from the center of the action. The Fever do not lack offensive talent. They lack an offensive hierarchy. Kelsey Mitchell Is Being Allowed to Play a Smaller Version of Her Own Game Kelsey Mitchell is one of the most explosive scorers in the WNBA. She is shooting: 49.5% from the field 42.3% from three 54.3% on two-point attempts 62.4% at the rim 61.8% from three to ten feet 62.7% true shooting Those are elite numbers. But they also reveal what Indiana is failing to maximize. Mitchell is devastating when she gets downhill, catches the ball in motion and attacks a rotating defense. More than 55% of her two-point field goals are assisted. It means her most efficient interior scoring is frequently being created through someone else’s pass. In practical terms: cuts, relocations, transition opportunities, secondary actions and catches against an already compromised defense. That is precisely the version of Mitchell Indiana should be building around. Instead, too many possessions end with her standing outside the three-point line, waiting for the ball so she can attempt to beat a set defender one-on-one. She is capable of doing it. That does not make it good offense. A difficult shot converted by a great scorer is still often a poorly constructed possession. The Game-by-Game Results Are Even More Revealing When Mitchell has made at least five two-point field goals in games alongside Clark, Indiana is: 10–4 Clark and Mitchell combine for 47.1 points per game in those contests. When Mitchell has made fewer than five two-point baskets, Indiana is: 2–6 Their combined scoring falls to 37.5 points per game. That is not a minor difference. It is a 46-point swing in winning percentage. When Mitchell is cutting, attacking, receiving the ball in motion and scoring inside the arc, Indiana wins at a high rate. When she becomes primarily a perimeter-based shot creator, Indiana’s efficiency and winning percentage collapse. The numbers do not say Mitchell should stop scoring. They say Indiana must change how she scores. When Clark and Mitchell Both Play Heavy Minutes, Playmaking Makes a Difference. In games where Clark and Mitchell both played at least 30 minutes, the Fever went 6–5. When Mitchell recorded at least two assists in those games, Indiana went: 6–3 When she recorded one assist or fewer: 0–2 When Mitchell reached at least three assists, Indiana went 4–2. The sample is not enormous, but the basketball logic is unmistakable. When Mitchell participates in the offense rather than merely finishing possessions, Indiana becomes more difficult to guard. The defense can no longer load toward her shot. Clark can attack a moving floor. Boston can operate against late help. Cutters receive the ball before the defense resets. The offense becomes connected. That is the difference between five talented players occupying the court and five players functioning as a unit. Mitchell’s On-Off Numbers Should Alarm the Organization Indiana’s net rating with Mitchell on the floor is +7.8. With her off the floor, it is +10.7. The Fever have been 2.9 points better per 100 possessions with Mitchell off the court. That does not mean Mitchell is a bad player. It means her scoring production is not translating into the level of team dependence expected from a player with her usage, minutes and offensive freedom. Her usage rate is 27.2%. She plays 32.5 minutes per game. She averages: 23.3 points 2.8 assists 1.6 rebounds 1.0 steal 0.1 blocks She is producing elite scoring with remarkably little peripheral impact. That is not an argument to reduce her role. It is an argument to redefine it. The Coaching Failure Is Structural This is where responsibility shifts from the player to the coaching staff. Players generally repeat what a system permits. If Mitchell is allowed to stand outside the arc, wait for the ball, reject movement and repeatedly attack one-on-one, then that is not merely a player habit. It is the offense. If Clark is permitted to spend possessions away from the ball while a less complete creator controls the action, then that is not an accident. It is a coaching decision. If Indiana’s best cutter can abandon cutting for an entire half without immediate correction, then the staff is not enforcing offensive standards. That is why this issue extends beyond Mitchell. The broader problem is that Stephanie White and her staff have not established a disciplined offensive identity. The Fever frequently appear to have concepts without rules, talent without hierarchy and freedom without accountability. Elite basketball does not operate that way. The best teams define: who initiates; where the first advantage comes from; what each player does when the ball is elsewhere; how spacing is preserved; when isolation is appropriate; and what happens when the first action fails. Indiana too often appears to define none of it firmly enough. The players are left to improvise. And improvisation without structure is streetball, regardless of how talented the participants may be. The Fix The solution is not complicated. Caitlin Clark must orchestrate the offense Clark should initiate the overwhelming majority of half-court possessions when she is on the floor. Not because Mitchell cannot dribble. Because Clark sees more, creates more and elevates more. Her job is not merely to score. Her job is to organize the entire defense and decide where the advantage will appear. Kelsey Mitchell must become an elite off-ball weapon Mitchell should be cutting, relocating, sprinting off screens and attacking closeouts. Her speed should force defenders to make decisions before she catches the ball. She should receive more passes while moving toward the basket and fewer while standing 24 feet away from it. The goal is not fewer Mitchell points. The goal is easier Mitchell points. Aliyah Boston must become part of the connective tissue Boston should screen, short roll, facilitate and punish switches. Clark-Boston actions should force the first defensive rotation. Mitchell’s movement should punish the second. That creates a layered offense instead of a sequence of isolated attacks. The staff must enforce possession standards Standing still cannot be optional. Ball-watching cannot be tolerated. Repeated one-on-one possessions cannot be mistaken for freedom. Every player should know what she is expected to do when the ball is not in her hands. That includes Mitchell. Especially Mitchell. The Final Diagnosis The Indiana Fever have enough talent to become the most dangerous offensive team in the WNBA. But talent is not the same as organization. Right now, Indiana is winning too often because its players are capable of overcoming the offense instead of being elevated by it. The numbers reveal the path forward. When Clark controls the game, Indiana functions. When Mitchell moves, cuts and scores within the structure, Indiana wins. When the Fever abandon those principles, they become ordinary. This is not a mystery anymore. The problem has been identified. The offense must run through Caitlin Clark. Kelsey Mitchell must stop waiting for the game to come to her and start attacking it without the ball. And the coaching staff must finally decide whether it wants to supervise talented streetball or coach championship basketball. Because Indiana already has the players. What it lacks is the system.

Here's an idea... Let's make a list of every politician in Congress that's opposed to the Save America Act and do a forensic financial audit of them I'm willing to bet we find out pretty quickly why they're voting no

They say Sharia law is already here in Texas... What say you, @KenPaxtonTX and @GregAbbott_TX ?

The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston is hiring an economist on a green card Accordingly to the forms they've submitted to Department of Labor, not a single American among the 350 million people living here is qualified for this role

WHY THE HELL AM I PAYING TAXES TO A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT: >CANNOT DEFUND THE TALBAN >CANNOT SECURE OUR ELECTIONS >CANNOT BALANCE A BUDGET >CANNOT READ THE BILLS THEY VOTE ON >CANNOT PASS TERM LIMITS >CANNOT PASS DOGE CUTS WHY ARE WE PAYING TAXES?!!!!!!

Of course Angel would fake an injury after this wonderful layup attempt calling for a foul without being touched🤣🤣🤣🤣. BUTTER PECAN!!!! BANG!

ALERT: Motaz Azaiza—an actual terrorist—was at the mayor of New York's house two days ago. Zohran Mamdani associates with terrorists because he supports them. Don't overthink it.

Isn’t it weird how unsubsidized consumer goods like TVs, appliances, clothes, all get cheaper and cheaper…while anything government puts its hands on, healthcare, housing, food, tuition, cars, utilities…just gets more and more unaffordable? Oh well. Probably nothing.

Oh look 👀 the Republicans are trying to sneak in mass amnesty again - this time it’s buried in the Agriculture Bill.

Lisa Murkowski is bankrolled by Melinda Gates?! Sadly, it gets worse. You know who who funded the initiative to get Ranked Choice Voting installed in Alaska? Bill Gates. And who did it benefit? Lisa Murkowski. Now do you see why she is a backstabbing RINO on Voter ID?

Believe them when they tell you who they are and what they will do.

Shocking scenes from the Netherlands. Islamic paramilitary units are training hard and openly declaring they will conquer the world. One of them bragged: "Alhamdulillah, the army of Muhammad is growing by the will of Allah. We will soon take over Europe and the world, inshallah." This is Islamists getting bolder on European soil. Europe must wake up before it is too late.

"Directo a Mexico," a program run by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, uses government resources to subsidize and help illegal aliens transfer cash to Mexico. @RealDonaldTrump should move to shut it down.

BREAKING: A trove of documents will reportedly be released exposing how a former member of Congress was staffing foreign agents of Qatar in other congressional offices. This would be absolutely insane.

🚨 I won't be gentle here because we have an extremely small window to stop this godforsaken foreign invasion of taxpayer-funded terror supporters. See this asshole on the right with the spectacles? The one holding hands with Hamas's former leader, Ismail Haniyeh, on the left? That's Georgetown professor Badar Khan Suri. He's from India. He's not a citizen of the United States. Let me say that again: HE IS NOT A CITIZEN. One more time: HE IS NOT A CITIZEN. @SecMullinDHS He was arrested by ICE for alleged ties to Hamas and promoting their propaganda immediately after Oct 7. He was released by one of Biden's commie judges. He's the son-in-law of a former Hamas official. He's still at Georgetown University. He's still operating on our soil. He travels the country speaking at events trashing America and lying about ICE. This is the definition of a foreign influence operation. Georgetown was handed $640 MILLION in federal funding last year. YOUR FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS are supporting this. I don't know WTH the Trump administration is doing, but I know what they're NOT doing. Get this terror-supporter away from American students. @EDSecMcMahon @SecScottBessent @SecRubio

Very few people in either party are actually representing the people who elected them. We the People have got to figure out how to grab the power and the initiative back from the very people we elected.