marshymoo

587 posts

marshymoo

marshymoo

@marsh_e79

Melbourne Katılım Ağustos 2010
4.5K Takip Edilen254 Takipçiler
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@FOXFOOTY Please explain what "come off the top rope" means, and who is going to do that? @FOXFOOTY !!
English
1
0
0
295
Fox Footy
Fox Footy@FOXFOOTY·
'INCANDESCENT WITH RAGE' 😡 TOTAL fury has erupted over Zak Butters' $1,500 fine for alleged umpire abuse. In fact, one third-party is tipped to "come off the top rope" in the superstar's defence. MORE FROM #AFL360 + #MidweekTackle >> bit.ly/3O1DY27
Fox Footy tweet media
English
12
3
43
50K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@FootyonNine I write to express concern re: the Zak Butters vs Nick Foot ruling. I hold no allegiance to the club but I find it unacceptable that a tribunal can find a charge 'proven' on the balance of prob's with no credible evidence, particularly when 3 witness statements refute allegation.
English
0
0
1
143
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@FootyonNine ### Want to voice your disgust to the AFL about the Zak Butters tribunal ruling? Follow these steps: 1. Go to: eafl.austfoot.com.au/afl-makearepor… 2. Enter these details: ## Report Type: "Integrity" ## Select "Other" and enter "AFL Tribunal process failure – evidentiary standard not met"
English
1
0
0
88
Footy on Nine
Footy on Nine@FootyonNine·
BREAKING: The tribunal has made its decision on the Zak Butters saga. #9WWOS #AFL
Footy on Nine tweet media
English
20
0
23
10.4K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@FOXFOOTY I write to express outrage re: the Zak Butters vs Nick Foot ruling. I hold no allegiance to the club but I find it unacceptable that a tribunal can find a charge 'proven' on the balance of prob's with NO evidence, particularly when 3 witness statements contradict the allegation!
English
0
0
0
135
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@FOXFOOTY ### Want to voice your disgust to the AFL about the Zak Butters tribunal ruling? Follow these steps: 1. Go to: eafl.austfoot.com.au/afl-makearepor… 2. Enter these details: ## Report Type: "Integrity" ## Select "Other" and enter "Umpire and AFL Tribunal corruption"
English
1
0
0
80
Fox Footy
Fox Footy@FOXFOOTY·
GUILTY The AFL Tribunal backs the umpire over Zak Butters in his alleged sledge case. WHAT THEY SAID >> bit.ly/4mvpaFE
Fox Footy tweet media
English
76
1
22
15K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@AFL I write to express outrage re: the Zak Butters vs Nick Foot ruling. I hold no allegiance to the club but I find it unacceptable that a tribunal can find a charge 'proven' on the balance of prob's with NO evidence, particularly when 3 witness statements contradict the allegation!
English
0
0
0
144
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@AFL ### Want to voice your disgust to the AFL about the Zak Butters tribunal ruling? Follow these steps: 1. Go to: eafl.austfoot.com.au/afl-makearepor… 2. Enter these details: ## Report Type: "Integrity" ## Select "Other" and enter "Umpire and AFL Tribunal corruption"
English
1
0
0
91
AFL
AFL@AFL·
Zak Butters has been found guilty of abusive and insulting language towards an umpire and fined $1500. Details: afl.com.au/news/1498046
AFL tweet media
English
333
12
122
63.9K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@PAFC ### Want to voice your disgust to the AFL about the Zak Butters tribunal ruling? Follow these steps: 1. Go to: eafl.austfoot.com.au/afl-makearepor… 2. Enter these details: ## Report Type: "Integrity" ## Select "Other" and enter "Umpire and AFL Tribunal corruption"
English
0
0
0
91
Port Adelaide FC
Port Adelaide FC@PAFC·
Zak Butters has had his charge upheld by the AFL Tribunal. Port Adelaide stands unequivocally with Butters and will await the formal Tribunal findings Wednesday morning before considering grounds for an appeal. portadelaidefc.com.au/news/1996478/
English
35
4
147
20.3K
Craig Butler
Craig Butler@butlerh101·
@rockwiz38 If proven incorrect, you need to apologise. I believe Foot!
English
5
0
4
662
Tom Rockliff
Tom Rockliff@rockwiz38·
Butters vs Foot… “How’s that a free” or “how much they paying you” Firstly, surely neither of them is reportable - bit precious. How they don’t have audio is unbelievable. I believe Zak’s version, and if proven correct, Foot should be having a few weeks off
English
115
16
942
76.3K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@rockwiz38 Horrific ruling! I thought the burden of proof is on the accuser. And in this case there is not only no proof, but multiple witness statements contradicting the claim. This is a miscarriage of justice. Shame on the @AFL. #GiveFootTheBoot #ZakButters
English
0
0
0
173
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@RalphyHeraldSun Horrific ruling! I thought the burden of proof is on the accuser. And in this case there is not only no proof, but multiple witness statements contradicting the claim. This is a miscarriage of justice. Shame on the @AFL. #GiveFootTheBoot #ZakButters
English
0
0
2
1.4K
Jon Ralph
Jon Ralph@RalphyHeraldSun·
The cost of an AFL appeal for a tribunal decision is $10,000 (refundable in the event of a successful appeal). You would think a Port Adelaide football club desperate to show Zak they are doing everything in their power would pay the cash. They would weigh it up against the cost of the distraction ahead of Saturday's Hawks game but surely this is the issue you die in a ditch over as a club to back your acting skipper
English
87
4
345
89.5K
Mitch Cleary
Mitch Cleary@cleary_mitch·
Port Adelaide’s Zak Butters found guilty of Abusive, Insulting, Threatening or Obscene Language Towards or in Relation to an Umpire. He’s been fined $1500 @7NewsMelbourne @7NewsAdelaide @7AFL
English
304
18
293
89.8K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@AFL Horrific ruling! I thought the burden of proof is on the accuser. And in this case there is not only no proof, but multiple witness statements contradicting the claim. This is a miscarriage of justice. Shame on the @AFL. #GiveFootTheBoot #ZakButters
English
0
0
1
33
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@FOXFOOTY Horrific ruling! I thought the burden of proof is on the accuser. And in this case there is not only no proof, but multiple witness statements contradicting the claim. This is a miscarriage of justice. Shame on the @AFL. #GiveFootTheBoot #ZakButters
English
0
0
8
447
Fox Footy
Fox Footy@FOXFOOTY·
'INCREDIBLY DISAPPOINTED' 😶 A short statement from Port Adelaide superstar Zak Butters after receiving a $1,500 fine for allegedly asking umpire Nick Foot “how much are they paying you?” #AFL360
English
38
6
110
34.1K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
Horrendously bad experience with @PowershopAus today. Have had to explain my situation multiple times as no records of conversations kept, no accountability taken. Awful service. I've advocated for them to friends and family so much in the past, but that ends now.
English
0
0
1
34
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@FranMooMoo The only thing that was well done was humiliating himself. Proved he's utterly unhinged and well out of his depth!
English
0
0
1
108
Francynancy
Francynancy@FranMooMoo·
Well done this morning to Matt Canavan on the ABC's Insiders. The taxpayer funded broadcaster doesn't even try to hide their climate activism. See how Speers tries to cut him off when he starts making way too much sense about the government's costings (or lack therof) for this renewables madness.
English
202
553
2.9K
63.2K
marshymoo
marshymoo@marsh_e79·
@TheRealPBarry TWA certainly know their CUB audience... (cashed-up bogans).
English
0
0
1
339
aflratings.com.au
aflratings.com.au@aflratings·
Marcus Bontempelli says he would be "pretty happy" to be in the same team as Zak Butters, via Mitch Cleary. @aflratings
aflratings.com.au tweet mediaaflratings.com.au tweet media
English
21
0
242
35.8K
InvestAnswers
InvestAnswers@Investanswers·
Best Bitcoin Number Ever
InvestAnswers tweet media
English
146
79
1.7K
55.9K