Dobreff 🦖

1.1K posts

Dobreff 🦖 banner
Dobreff 🦖

Dobreff 🦖

@martindobreff

ORDO AB CHAO 🦉

Bulgaria Katılım Ocak 2016
930 Takip Edilen219 Takipçiler
Rosebud AI
Rosebud AI@Rosebud_AI·
The AI game dev stack is getting absurd: ChatGPT Image 2 → cinematic world + sprites (seconds) Rosebud → auto-slices them into your game You → shipping multiple levels in <20 min Reply and we'll send a Rosebud code so you can try it.
Rosebud AI tweet mediaRosebud AI tweet mediaRosebud AI tweet media
English
456
227
2.4K
145.2K
Dobreff 🦖
Dobreff 🦖@martindobreff·
@Tim_Denning What will happen if everybody start doing their own businesses? Who will do the "normal" but needed work?
English
0
0
0
2
@TheUnseenTake
@TheUnseenTake@theunseentake·
Wow @armaniferrante, MadVincent lied right on your face. He timed me out on lads server for asking him "what exactly was the right reason according to you to ban other OG lads ".. then he timed me out for an hour shared a set of finger pointing and other weird gifs right after that. (check ur logs with time mentioned on the screenshots attached, its UTC+5:50) Such a low life scmbg Vincent is. Lying that I was never timed out. Im pretty sure you aren't ready to choose Vincent over Backpack and madlads in your life. @MadLads @Backpack
@TheUnseenTake tweet media@TheUnseenTake tweet media
English
11
2
65
5.9K
OrcDev
OrcDev@orcdev·
what's your perfect tech stack to start a project today?
English
141
3
129
134.1K
Dobreff 🦖
Dobreff 🦖@martindobreff·
@orcdev Yes, my fav styling tool, still using it
English
0
0
0
4
OrcDev
OrcDev@orcdev·
anyone remember bootstrap?
English
80
4
113
9.8K
Armani Ferrante
Armani Ferrante@armaniferrante·
On FUD. FUD is an opportunity to either address misunderstandings or to identify mistakes and simply fix them. With every TGE, emotions run hot, as people focus on a single number, the token price, determining one’s feelings. It’s human nature, and because Backpack has such a large community around the world, spanning from advanced traders in Asia, to wallet users on every network, Mad Lad holders around the world, and everyone in between, the TGE is a time where people vocalize their views. I would like to address several different topics I’ve seen floating around over the past few days to set the record straight and offer my perspective. - OTC. I can’t believe I have to say this, no, we aren’t OTCing our own tokens to cash out. See the tokenomics. Fake news. End of story. What is true: buyers reached out to me and asked for OTC. I am happy to help buyers find more tokens. Unfortunately, due to the bad history of other crypto projects using OTC to cash out, folks assumed the worst when they saw me post about OTC in discord. - Mad Lads. All existing Mad Lad holders pre-TGE retain their Backpack VIP status. New holders do not. Some like this, some hate this. I understand both perspectives. My perspective is that Mad Lads has always been an evolution alongside Backpack. We went from the whitelist games inside Backpack => pre-reveal inside Backpack => reveal boss inside Backpack => xNFT inside Backpack => airdrops inside Backpack => VIP points inside Backpack => the BP token. Each one of these stages created a clear path for Mad Lads to get to the next stage, always focusing on long term holders over people that come and go. There are people that follow the path, and people that do not. There are people that evolve with us and people that do not. Our approach from the day Mad Lads was born has always been to focus people on the Backpack product. Naturally, new people came into Mad Lads with their own pre-conceived notion of what it was or what it should be. This creates tension. But we have always had a strong vision and we will always stick to it. The people that use the product always get to the next stage, where every stage answers a single question: how do we push Backpack forward. When designing token utility, it’s a question of economics, and it would be a disservice to BP to not align incentives around it. There’s an additional nuance worth pointing out: Backpack is different from basically every other product that dropped a mined token because we KYC users and are selective about the regions we open up. Those users have been out of the game, so to speak, not because I want to do that–nothing upsets me more than not being able to serve users in a particular region (what founder would want that?)--but it’s because we have chosen the path of building a crypto native financial institution. That path is long and hard. For these users, we have maintained the path to get to the next stage and have communicated that. When we open up regions, these regions will get their drops, and we will be running new campaigns to get more drops just by using the product, and that brings everyone up to speed with the same VIP benefits of the original pre-TGE seasons. For the long term holders, nothing has changed. The key issue is with respect to new NFT holders. Some people will hate this. Some will think it’s sound economics. I understand both perspectives. We are doing what we think is best. - Sybills. Our goal was to protect retail users competing for points against sophisticated players splitting accounts and giving themselves an unfair advantage over those that don’t. The mistake we made: our process was too black and white. From the team’s point of view, we had a line and we stuck to it. From the community’s point of view, the line is nuanced. We did not sufficiently take that into consideration. - Price/FDV. With every token comes the human nature to think about the price at all times. There are good ways to think about price and there are clearly illegal ways to think about price. Our position is simple, we are building over a long period of time, and we are not making short term decisions. 24h post-TGE FDV is not a meaningful metric. Even 1 week post-TGE FDV is not a meaningful metric. If you ask anyone that’s ever built anything, they’ll tell you the same. Many people will take issue with that statement, and that’s ok. Ultimately, you have to look at our incentives and decide for yourself. The fact of the matter is that the team and I are incentivized to make Backpack a success with arguably the most extreme tokenomics ever created. What happens if the token goes to zero and stays there? Our company fails, and we get nothing. Some people might rebut saying that we get rich from the company revenue. No. That is simply not how companies work. We don’t get rich from a bad token price. We are punished in the most extreme possible way. And we are rewarded in the most extreme way only if we achieve all of our hopes and dreams. The way it should be. This is by design. Beyond this post you won’t see me talk about price or FDV. You will see me talking about building and creating long term value. And it’s only by doing that, can BP become a success. Every project goes through trials and tribulations. This is certainly a moment for us. We are nothing without our community, and we will serve it in the best way we know how. I have complete conviction, I am all in, and the team is all in. Don’t trust us, look at the tokenomics to decide for yourself. Thank you for reading this. Thank you especially to those that have supported us this week. It means a lot. We will continue to review the above, particularly the cases around sybils, and get back to building.
English
435
103
734
231.4K
Armani Ferrante
Armani Ferrante@armaniferrante·
Our sybil team is re-evaluating more nuanced cases. Thank you to everyone that has supported us.
English
150
16
233
35.4K
mold
mold@ffiml2358763210·
I didn't come into crypto 9 years ago to launch a shit coin.
Armani Ferrante@armaniferrante

I didn't come into crypto 9 years ago to launch a shit coin. I didn't come into crypto to get rich quick. I came into crypto because I believe it's going to change the world, and that the industry was something worth dedicating my life to. But somewhere along the way, amidst the booms, the busts, the moonshots, the decentralization theater, and the straight up scams, we lost our way. I don't know about you, but I'm just tired of false promises. And that's what most things are today, simply promises. We live in the most centralized era crypto has ever experienced, and the more centralized something is, the less meaningful a token is. While it's tempting to want to commit to these same promises, what happens if the team gets acquired? What happens if we want to re-invest into growth? What happens if we divert our time, energy, and resources out of band and circumvent the token altogether? What happens when the team and investors unlock? For many projects, the honest answer to these questions is not pleasant, and you see it in the price chart over and over again. Unless something is completely decentralized to the point where an immutable protocol can function with the team having retired in the Bahamas sipping pina coladas all day, then utility is just a promise. Often that promise is admirable and well intentioned--but ultimately an unenforceable promise nonetheless. Outside of BTC, ETH, SOL, and a few others, nothing really passes this test. Noble new token models have emerged to solve this problem (shout out to MetaDAO), and today, we introduce our own. Users that stake the Backpack token for at least a year will have the opportunity to exchange those tokens for equity at a fixed ratio--20% of the company today. It's such a simple idea, but as far as I'm aware, this is the first time a user has been able to earn the equity of a company by just using the product. So obvious in hindsight, and something I hope others start to adopt as they march on their path to progressive decentralization--both in crypto and outside of the industry. We have a lot more utility coming, things we'll share over the coming weeks, months, and year. As the Backpack community grows, we will decentralize the token, offering new things over time, some centralized like our equity offering, some decentralized as our product evolves. In the limit, I expect the token to represent more than anything a single company has to offer, but in the short run, it's the best we can do to show our long term commitment to our users. I've said it before and I'll say it again. I can't promise anything. The only thing I can promise is commitment. We go big or we go home--together, actually together.

English
3
0
12
1.7K
poised.sol
poised.sol@PoisedM1·
I would do literally anything for this man Now back to work
poised.sol tweet media
English
5
2
29
2.9K
Rangel Ivanov
Rangel Ivanov@mad_archer_·
My first fpga board is alive :D
English
4
6
87
0
Dobreff 🦖 retweetledi
Play Solana | PSG1
Play Solana | PSG1@playsolana·
PSG1 is the first crypto-native gaming device. Don’t miss your chance to own a piece of history. Order today 👇
English
514
421
649
43.6K
Play Solana | PSG1
Play Solana | PSG1@playsolana·
Still wrapping up from the Matrix Hackathon, and the winners got the spotlight. We're hosting a weekly AMA series with the winning teams: Monday: @sendarcadefun Wednesday: @Gableguardians Friday: @vortiqhq 🕘 9PM UTC every session. Come meet the teams shaping what’s next for Solana Gaming 👾
Play Solana | PSG1 tweet media
English
439
376
533
31.3K
Dobreff 🦖 retweetledi
Play Solana | PSG1
Play Solana | PSG1@playsolana·
❇️ Transmission detected… The simulation has been breached. 60+ teams entered the Matrix Hackathon, bending code, rewriting mechanics, and pushing the limits of what games on Solana can be. The results are in. Congratulations to everyone who joined us to kick off the new gaming season👇
English
483
398
607
47.1K