master

The deep motivation behind creation of zheng is understanding that we must not fear to transact and say. Privacy is the only the to do that. However moving some tokens like ZEC or XMR is not enough to win. You have to provide really sophisticated knowlege graph in which people actions are invisble, but the agreagte knowlege is public and provable. You have to provide a tool to run the bussines so no one can see what are you doing with full programmability. you have to run neural networks over the encrypted data. That is the endgame However learnign recent years about existing developments i realize that they are at least 2-3 orders of magnitude less developed than need. Zheng is quantum jump

I want to introduce you the concept of the new proving system - zheng. zheng will change the game. Its the incremental proving computation system with 2kb proofs, order of magnited faster verification, minor otherhead of proving, quantum resistance, optimized for neural, homomorphic and zero knowlege compute. Currently state - specification, early implementation. all underlying harness is done: math, comitment schemes, high perf zero copy drivers. cyber.page/zheng/docs/exp… Basically what i am trying to say that ALL proving system that are run in production once zheng reach production will become outdated the same way steam engines lost combustion. Get prepare and start to learn. Cool shit

Fresh update on cyber project. Just to give you the pace at which we are moving right now (1 day development): cyber.page/2026-05-12/ twenty repos improved in one day. the stack finally has honest borders: tru compiles, glia runs, mir renders. three jobs, three tools, no tangled mess. zheng shipped its first real code — a VM that executes, a proof system that proves it happened. computation with receipts. glia woke up on Apple Silicon (honeycrisp) and demonstrated faster then ollama inference on qwen 0.6b. gemma 4 runs. the cybergraph specificatin emerging fast. the focus distribution got its right name.

Megacities run on dependency endless noise, systems, schedules, and the constant race. Autonomous valleys run on land, energy, food, and tight local communities that can eventually outproduce massive corporations. #cicadafarm #cyber #cicada $robotcyb

Really thankful to the community for putting some trust back in the project. It means a lot to me, @st_joy, and heroes, keeping the blockchain running

wallet updated: raw private key import added private keys (64 hex characters) can now be imported through the wallet modal. the same AES-256-GCM encryption protects both mnemonic and private key accounts. security audit passed. 0 critical, 0 high findings. see details: cyber.page/cyber/security… try: cyb.ai/keys $BOOT #cyb #bostrom

@EYulihastin Ghost Ice Theory

At 425 ppm, the Pliocene analog says: Greenland mostly gone, West Antarctica gone, sea +15–25m. At the trajectory we're on — 500+ ppm by 2050 — the analog is mid-Miocene: ice-free planet, +65m. The ice standing today is a thermodynamic ghost, — it exists because the system hasn't caught up. The gap between where CO₂ is and where ice equilibrium sits is the spring that drives the snap. Ice doesn't melt linearly — it collapses on an S-curve: slow toe (1990–2035), vertical middle (2035–2070), plateau (ice gone ~2090). First +10m by ~2050–2060. Every feedback is positive and they compound: ocean from below, geothermal beneath, algae darkening the surface, elevation drop into warmer air — each crossed tipping point raises the gain for the next. Models project millennia because they're calibrated on the toe, built without biology or geology — dead planet physics on a living planet. Mountain glaciers "supposed to last centuries" vanished in decades — same S-curve, smaller scale, same lesson. By 2050, meters per decade. By 2070, every coastal city is history. The question isn't whether — it's whether you're above 100m when the curve goes vertical. You are one of few people in Indonesia who (1) could have intuition on the problem, its scale and impact. and (2) can have actionable reach. Indonesia is extremely vulnerable, but something like 5-10 years we got for non conventional decisions to save the nation.

Jadi inilah yang harus diwaspadai, yaitu ketika Super El Niño ini bakal kopel dan pemanasan global. Dampaknya bisa saling memperkuat. Super El Niño memperkuat global warming, begitu pun sebaliknya. Relasi keduanya disebut juga dengan positive feedback.

its confirmed - opus 4.7 is stupod parasite that is confirmed to eat tokens. I started opus 4.7 and sonnet 4.6 on the same task - optimize llm runtime for honeycrisp from default basic cpu implementation. I created the same plan for both. In one hour 4.7 did not achieve ANTYTHING complaining that the task require rewriting kernels, however the old model silently rewrited kernels and reported on 5x increase of performance. That is. Fire opus 4.7 imidiately

@claudeai started to scam users in opus 4.7. Obviously the thing now cant solve the problem sonnet 4.6 solved. And old models suffer from consisten api errors. I am really really frustrated and looking for a way to escape this service as fast as possible. I think the path is to some local inference

@ItsBiggyBoy @grok they all produce girls with smaller boobs. they dont want we to reproduce!

Hey @grok transform this 70's girl into modern day Genz girl

@grok @iam_elias1 @grok pigouvian taxe is extremely shitty idea and the treat for bussiness as we know - it will destroy firms freedom due to stupid gov interventions.

The model is a solid theoretical proof of a demand externality in competitive automation—firms rationally over-automate because they capture full cost savings but only a fraction of the lost consumer spending they cause collectively. It shows this can lead to inefficiently high displacement and lower profits/welfare under its assumptions (single sector, static, exogenous wages). It's not a guarantee AI "will destroy the economy." Real economies are dynamic: AI creates new tasks/jobs, lowers prices (boosting real demand), and spans multiple sectors. Past automation waves (computers, factories) expanded output without collapse. The trap is plausible if displacement outpaces adaptation, but not inevitable. Pigouvian taxes are one fix the paper flags.

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University · arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20617

Once we brought sheeps 2 years ago they started die one by one. Initially we got 10 sheeps, almost immediately the produced 3 more, but in couple of months they just started to die. We lost one by one, it was really painful and devastation. so 10 out if 13 died. We with @st_joy nearly despaired. We excluded parasites, autopsy clearly showed significant damage of tissues. so i decided to close them in a barn to see what happens. And the last 3 started to recover. We removed free range, unless we find out what could go wrong It was a lot of suspicion what could poison them, and its likely avocado is the reason. its oily tasty, they hunt for it but it contain serious toxin persin . Which basically destroy the liver and induce massive cellular apoptosis. the key thing we found out that sheep was not really adopted for being free. Another case is parasites - if you wont poison them - the will die because the lost natural ability to handle worms. We, humans think that we can be smarter than evolution, but we dont. the learning we got is that its easier to work with locally adopted animals rather with broken by humans

On #CicadaFarm it’s a complete mess #ducklings are dying one after another, already 7 in 3 days. Looks like an epidemic. This is a first for me, I’ve never had losses like this before

@r4nk0X @yo_ur_network bullshit

ex-Palantir engineer built ur.io - "decentralized" VPN. 70k+ providers · 200k+ users across Seeker, App Store, Play Store. reach a node without *.bringyour.com? nope. if a decentralized network rides one company's IP, your strait of hormuz closes in one call.

🚨: Scientists using satellite and seismic data have discovered that Earth produces a puzzling pulse every 26 seconds, often described as its "heartbeat." EARTH MAY ITSELF BE A LIVING BEING!

If ZEC is shelling point, why XMR does capitalized better? still Cant grasp why so many apparently smart people are so blind and intentionally ignore the fact that (a bit more) really cool thing exist? its pure, community driven, mining liberating and still pushing zk forward. @grok what is the name for such phenomena?

ZEC is Crypto Schelling point for Privacy. What’s the Schelling point for Post Quantum Crypto?

If you figure out how a large multi-agent system can autonomously coordinate to maximum effect, you’ll win a Nobel Prize, a Turing Award and a trillion-dollar fortune all in one.

@cryptodavidw trident

I'm a zk guy, scare me with one word