matt

@Zephyr_hg this looks sick gamma

My sales email response rate jumped from 5% to 18%. Built an automation that creates personalized sales presentations in 90 seconds by researching prospect websites and uses Gamma to generate custom pitch decks automatically. Scrapes their sitemap, analyzes key pages, identifies pain points, and builds an 8-slide deck tailored specifically to their business. Prospects can tell I actually researched them because the deck references their specific challenges. No more generic templates that scream copy-paste. Comment "GAMMA" and I'll DM it to you (must be following)

@NoahEpstein_ outreach, was building one myself but curious to see 👀

if you're not already doing 6 figures trying to scale your agency is how you go from profitable to broke in 6 months AI work is bimodal: either a $15/hr VA can prompt it, or you need someone with a PhD. there's no middle tier. that $120k "AI specialist" you hired? they're either overqualified or faking it. every AI agency founder hits this moment: you're doing $40k/month in revenue. working 70-hour weeks. you think "I need to scale. I need to hire." so you post on Twitter: "Looking for an AI engineer. Must know Python, prompt engineering, and LangChain." you get 50 applications. you hire someone for $120k. three months later you realize: 80% of what they do could be done by a $15/hour VA with good ChatGPT prompts the other 20% requires understanding transformer architectures at a level they definitely don't have there's no middle. the "AI engineer" role as advertised doesn't exist as a stable position. and here's the part that kills agencies: your actual competitive advantage was never your "methodology" or your "proprietary framework" it was the 300 hours YOU personally spent understanding one client's Byzantine data infrastructure. their SAP system from 2007. their Excel sheets with macros written by someone who retired in 2015. their Salesforce instance that three different consultants have Frankensteined together. that knowledge doesn't transfer to employees. it dies in their brain when they leave for the next opportunity. meanwhile your margins are imploding: Revenue per client: $8k/month Your salary (founder): $0 (you're "reinvesting") New hire salary: $10k/month Recruiter fee: $24k upfront Their first project: they need 40 hours of training. from you. the person who has no time. the agencies actually printing money? still 1-2 people. charging $10.000+ and have a waitlist to onboard more clients. they're not trying to scale. they're selling their personal scar tissue at premium rates and saying no to everything else. your "scalable agency" is less profitable than just being an expensive consultant. act like it.

@NoahEpstein_ MCP

just found an mcp that changed how i use claude for n8n every other ai tool guesses at n8n structure uses outdated training data hands you broken json and says "good luck" this one scrapes n8n's live documentation in real-time not from when the model was trained documentation from TODAY but here's what actually broke my brain: told claude to build a client onboarding system stripe + notion + gmail + slack watched it: → plan the architecture → build each node → deploy directly to my n8n instance → hit an auth error → debug itself → fix the oauth scope → run again → work perfectly 8 minutes. live in my instance. ready for clients. it doesn't just generate workflows it deploys, runs, watches them fail, fixes them, runs again until they work while everyone's manually dragging nodes i'm typing english and shipping same day comment "MCP" and i'll send you: → the mcp setup guide → exact prompts that build production workflows in minutes → how to get early access

nobody building an AI agency posts their failures because we're all in a mimetic bubble pretending the unit economics work privately? we're all terrified we're building on quicksand i've been in 9 founder group chats this year. public Twitter: "Just closed another $50k deal! AI agencies are the future! 🚀" private Signal at 2am: "bro I think I'm cooked. client just asked why they're paying me $10k/month when ChatGPT Team is $60." the entire discourse is performance art. everyone's signaling competence to attract clients. nobody's sharing actual numbers because the numbers are terrifying: 6-month average client lifetime (they wise up or go in-house) 40% margin after you factor in API costs and support zero proprietary moat (your "custom solution" is 600 lines of Python anyone could replicate) we're all larping as successful while privately updating our resumes. the most honest content would be shutdown announcements with real revenue breakdowns: "We did $500k in revenue. $380k in costs. Spent 18 months building. Couldn't raise. Couldn't exit. Here's the Stripe dashboard. Here's what we'd do differently." but that doesn't happen because: admitting failure hurts your reputation the next gig might be... starting another agency everyone else is pretending to win so you have to pretend too it's game theory all the way down. the uncomfortable truth: the probability scores on those contrarian takes aren't measuring how TRUE they are. they're measuring how SAYABLE they are. everyone knows the clock is ticking. nobody's incentivized to say it out loud. except maybe here. right now. when the algorithm's not watching. the best founders aren't the ones crushing it on socials. they're the ones who saw this coming, extracted maximum value, and pivoted before the music stopped. the rest of us? still pretending we're building something permanent while the floor dissolves beneath us. saved to drafts. will never post. algorithms punish honesty.

most AI agencies are just reselling OpenAI's API at a 15x markup and calling it "strategic consulting" your client pays you $8k/month for what costs them $200 if they did it themselves nobody says this part out loud because it doesn't close deals. but let's do the math: Your client's invoice: $8,000/month Your actual API costs: $200/month Your "value add": wrapping it in a nice UI and answering Slack messages this isn't innovation. it's markup. and it works. for now. because: their IT department moves like continental drift nobody in procurement has time to learn what an API actually costs you're solving a real problem (their ChatGPT subscription isn't enough) but the second they do the math, and they will, your entire value proposition collapses unless you can defend it with genuine proprietary infrastructure. can you defend it? because you're a 3-person agency running on Vercel and Supabase, praying OpenAI doesn't change their terms of service. you don't have proprietary infrastructure. you have a thin wrapper and good vibes. the honest positioning nobody will ever use: "we're a temporary arbitrage opportunity with a degrading margin profile" why it's temporary: IT departments are catching up (slowly, but inevitably) Claude Enterprise just launched better integrations Your $200k annual contract is one procurement review away from becoming a $2k SaaS subscription the market pretends agencies add "strategic value." clients tolerate you because you move faster than their internal teams. that tolerance has a timer on it. you're not disrupting anything. you're occupying the space between "too painful to do internally" and "painful enough that IT gets budget priority." that space is closing. the successful founders know this. they're just not posting about it on here

@miniarchillect speed above all

@natenkgwn glory be

@mattmonclair amen bro - Jesus gets all the glory

first ever public speaking opportunity tdy blessed to do what i love at 20 🙏🏾 had tons of fun & audience got value thank God

@VanceE motion is motion

Depression cannot hit a moving target. Best quote I’ve heard all year.

@rumilyrics that’s how the liabilities get weeded out

Never quit something with great long term potential just because you can't deal with the stress of the moment.

@nishimiya amen brotha

brother to brother i know you're tired but we don't quit here

@NoahEpstein_ love the reframing, definitely a great way to stand out from competitors - amplify me johnny

i stopped selling AI automation here's what i sell instead used to walk into meetings and say: "we'll automate your workflows" "AI will handle the repetitive stuff" "you'll save 20 hours a week" close rate? maybe 15% businesses heard "automation" and pictured: → robots replacing their team → systems they don't understand → becoming dependent on tech that breaks fear kills deals so i changed the pitch completely now i sell "employee amplification" same exact service completely different frame here's how it works: old pitch: "we'll automate your invoice processing" new pitch: "tinky winky spends 6 hours a day matching invoices. what if tinky winky did that in 11 minutes and spent the rest of the day on supplier negotiations—the thing you actually hired him for?" old pitch: "AI will handle your customer emails" new pitch: "po answers 200 emails a day. 180 of them are the same 12 questions. what if po only handled the 20 that actually needed a human brain, and spent the rest of the time closing deals?" the client doesn't want fewer employees they want better employees they hired tinky winky because tinky winky is brilliant at negotiation but tinky winky is drowning in data entry they hired po because po closes deals but po is buried in inbox management automation isn't about replacing tinky winky and po it's about unleashing them when you pitch replacement, you trigger fear when you pitch amplification, you trigger excitement "your team is about to become superhuman" "same headcount, 3x the output" "tinky winky finally does what you hired tinky winky for" close rate went from 15% to over 60% same service same price same delivery different story stop selling automation start selling what automation enables comment "AMPLIFY" and i'll send you the exact pitch framework + the discovery questions that uncover who tinky winky and po are in every business

@_ProfitPath ordering estrogen rn

Female accounts convert 3-5x better than male accounts and you mfs are too scared to talk about it or too stupid to use it... Same content. Same offer. Same audience. Female profile pic = 3-5x more DM replies This is just data. Cope if you want. Stay broke if you want. why this works: -Men want to help women (it's hardwired, can't change it) -Women are perceived as less "salesy" -Female accounts feel more authentic (unfair but true) -Less competition (most "gurus" are men) how smart mfs are using this -Creating female personas for faceless accounts -Hiring women to be the face of their brand -Running offers "for women" even if taught by men behind the scenes -Using female VAs to handle all DMs (response rate goes crazy) u can use this to sell to women... -Take any successful offer -Add "for women" to the title -Same exact content. Same price. -2-3x conversions because less competition Examples that print: "Twitter growth for women" (same strategies, different positioning) "Investing for women" (same info, female branding) "Starting a business for women" (same playbook, different audience) Different positioning. Way more money. how do you get the women? Find women on Instagram/Pinterest (they're -desperate to get paid for existing) Offer rev share to be face of brand They record videos, you do everything else Everyone wins Pinterest is literally a model recruitment agency if you know how to use it. Thousands of beautiful women posting for free hoping someone notices them. Or just be a playboy and do it like me conversion estimates Male account: 100 DMs → 10 calls → 2 sales Female account: 100 DMs → 30 calls → 8 sales Could be 4x revenue for doing zero additional work You can be mad about this or you can fucking use it study the yegor method dm me "yegor" and i'll send you my x monetization playbook

@EXM7777 too many people are focused on polishing another tool thats gonna "solve all their problems" just fucking execute

how to NOT fail your first business: - stop setting up stupid tools (notion workspace, CRM...) that don't generate revenue - making your website & logo your #1 priority is a trap - put ALL your energy into generating leads - deliver a service so good that customers physically can't leave - don't even THINK about scaling for the first 3 months - never hire cheap contractors - do it yourself first, THEN delegate - focus on ONE offer and execute it relentlessly until it's easy - never sell your time - never sell cheap, it attracts nightmare clients - say what you'll do, then do what you said - invest early cash in infrastructure that prepares you for scale later on - build strong onboarding flows - focus obsessively on your clients and they'll make you more $ than any cold outreach ever will

now this is the fuckin blueprint on how to follow up on a lead pure disregard for putting on a face and acting nonchalant shoved his feelings to the side and ends up closing the deal because of PERSISTENCE

if you're in the internet money space you either played sports or video games or both have never seen a theater kid bot make it in this space but ive seen countless ex pro gamers or great athletes guess its just a gene you inherit to be overly ambitious and willing to bet on urself

this was all FOR FREE as well easiest data scrape i've ever seen 18% call → convo 33% convo → booked make sure to follow + rt so you can steal it for yourself

winning boils down to simply being able to handle losing for an extended period of time then finally you end up winning as a by-product

if being in a relationship before you win is more important to you than the win itself ngmi you can get a girl whenever you want there’s a very small window to succeed in the way you want though speed above all