Xmc0809
3.8K posts


🚨 Top 10 tennis players whose careers were stolen by injury 🎾
1. Juan Martín del Potro
2. Dominic Thiem
3. Andy Roddick
4. Marat Safin
5. Lleyton Hewitt
6. Gustavo Kuerten
7. Juan Carlos Ferrero
8. Kei Nishikori
9. Robin Söderling
10. Tommy Haas
11. David Nalbandian
12. Mario Ančić
13. Milos Raonic
14. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
15. Gaël Monfils


Suomi

@BarclayCard18 Nadal: I thought he could have won at least 5 more slams, but for his injuries. He missed 18 Grand Slams through his career.
Serena: She could have won more if she took tennis seriously and played more tournaments earlier in her career. She was in 4 finals after childbirth.
English

@BobbySandell1 @DjokovicFan_ Rafa missed many GS he did not play owing to injuries. If he played all, then yes!
English

@DjokovicFan_ I am a big Rafa fan and when he won Australia to get his 22nd major to go two up on Joker’s 20, I thought Rafa had a chance to be the player with the most majors.
Novak is clearly the GOAT!
English

@winnerbet7 @janniksin @AustralianOpen To start with, the word is 'Psychology'. Indeed, a break can affect a player's momentum. Realistically, it will affect 'both' player's momentum. Should it not be part of the training for both players to be prepared for such situations?
English

@maxcole11 @janniksin @AustralianOpen Do you know a break can kill momentum. Can affect phychology of the player. And can make another player recover from set back
English

Not easy today against a very tough opponent. Wishing you all the best 🙏🏻 Really happy to be in the next round here 🇳🇿💪🏻 @AustralianOpen


English

@hcaulfield8148 @janniksin @AustralianOpen You are still missing the point!!! Roof closed or not, breaks or not, if the opponent was the better player overall, he would have won! Period!!! They were both subjected to the breaks, roof being closed, etc. The better player still won. Keep screaming!!!
English

Lmao had the roof not been closed, a 30 min break not been taken, and play had continued as it had been uninterrupted, Sinner was toast. Meanwhile, Cahill and Tilley are panicking in the hallways and rushing to close the roof right after Sinner goes down 1-3 in the third. Same shit that happened at Wimbledon with Grigor as soon as Sinner was down 2sets. GTFO. Dude is a doper and a cheat.
English

@Isithetraveler @janniksin @AustralianOpen No! Sinner played the match and won! If the opponent was that skilled and better conditioned, he should have won. The roof was not closed only over Sinner but both. The both had the break. Your point is...??
English

@janniksin @AustralianOpen Not easy, but the AO handed the match to you. Disrespectful to the sport
English

@vientosreales @janniksin @AustralianOpen Did they just close the roof over sinners head? Pls know the rules before commenting. 😂
English

@vientosreales @janniksin @AustralianOpen This statement is nonsensical. They were both subjected to the breaks. If the opponent were that skilled and better conditioned than Sinner, then he should have clearly won!
English

@janniksin @AustralianOpen It was not right . The conditions must be the same for all players and it is not the case
English

@winnerbet7 @janniksin @AustralianOpen How can it be the break to save Sinner? If the opponent was that good and skilled as well as better conditioned than Sinner, why did he not win? Why is the opponent not using the break too to his advantage??
English

@janniksin @AustralianOpen I came here for the reply and I was not disappointed. I knew Sinner was going to get bashed after that unnecessary break.
Sinner was down and out and it was the break that saved him.
English

@hcaulfield8148 @janniksin @AustralianOpen How can the roof save him and not the opponent? What lamr argument! Were they not subjected to the same conditions - open and closed roof? Were the heat rules only just made? If the opponent was better conditioned than Sinner and skilled, should he not have won?
English

@AvKeepitsimple @janniksin @AustralianOpen Listen up! roof or not being closed, if the opponent was that good, he should have still cooked Sinner. What are we talking about? If he was indeed skilled and better conditioned, whether the roof was closed, the match stopped, etc, the opponent should have won.
English

@janniksin @AustralianOpen Stamina and the ability to stay effective deep into matches matter just as much as being so skilled in tennis. It was unfair outcome to Spizzirri.
English

@not_rekt_11 @jakeBigRed It’s not even the same person . Her last name was Diallo not Iman
English

@iCashTennis @gigicat7_ Of course! he does otherwise he won"t have played.
English

@KatMan_8 @josemorgado ... because Sinner was better and never allowed Alcaraz to play his game. Alcaraz did not go there to lose!!
English

@tennisf86723336 @josemorgado No! but Alcaraz certainly did not go there to lose. They both went to play. Otherwise, he didn't need to win his semi-final match.
English

@josemorgado LOL! It's interesting how some are claiming it was pointless for Djokovic to continue play after losing! That narrative would have changed if he were able to win against Fritz. He would not have retired had he won the first set. I already guessed if he lost that set, he'll quit.
English

@JackNeil51 @TheTennisLetter That is Sinner's problem to deal with and not yours!!!
English

@TheTennisLetter Someone having so many physical problem few days ago. How can he be able to play good here..
English

Sinner on facing Novak Djokovic next at Six Kings Slam
“You’re gonna play someone you’ve beaten quite a lot the last few years. Are you gonna be nice to Novak Djokovic?”
Jannik: “We all hope it’s a good match. This is all we hope for. We know each other very well… we’ve played many many times. It’s great to share the court again with Novak. Especially here in front of you guys. We’ll just try to play the best possible tennis we can. We’ll just see how it goes. Mostly we are here to enjoy. To bring tennis here. All we hope is that you guys enjoy. That’s why we’re here.” ❤️

English












