Mr. Matt

I am a truth telling account If the truth offends you, you can fuck off and go hide in your corner

Clash In Italy: I’d like to see Gunther beat Cody and I’d like to see Solo interfere and cost Jacob in the Tribal Combat match as revenge for Jacob turning on him last year. Jacob would have to serve Roman and it would lead to a more layered storyline

Cornyn, Cassidy, and Tillis are Senators who prioritized being accepted by the DC Establishment over doing what their voters wanted them to do That’s why two of them lost their primary and one was basically forced into retirement Get the fuck out

@V_JosephKatzEsq I’m not too sure I believe her story

@mbs59er You mean except for Juanita Broderick, right?

Trump and Bill Clinton are very similar guys They love the adulation of women and will take advantage of them when given the opportunity What they won’t do is publicly sexually assault someone who isn’t a willing participant

“He tried to rape me” When? “I can’t remember” What year was it? “I’m not sure” If it wasn’t political then nobody in their right mind would think the accusation is believable

It’s not a coincidence that E Jean Carroll and Christine Blasey Ford couldn’t remember the date or even year of the alleged sexual assaults they suffered You can’t defend yourself from a false accusation if they don’t tell you when the alleged event happened

@Canuckistani1 My boy? Shut up Canadian

@mbs59er Your boy stepped out on his wife.

Pointing out Paxton’s personal flaws is missing the point. Paxton isn’t trying to be a religious leader, he’s running for Senator. Paxton will represent the people of Texas better than Talarico will. Talarico is preaching a heretical brand of Christianity that is insulting

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision. That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there. Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level. Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline. The case proceeded anyway. The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence. Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict. An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status. Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

“But a jury convicted him!” A jury made up of people who just elected Mamdani… Not the flex you think it is

Clinton had Paula Jones escorted to his hotel room where he privately propositioned her. When she turned him down he didn’t force himself on her The idea that Trump, a world famous celebrity and powerful man, would publicly try to sexually assault a woman is ridiculous

@samtosane @patschultzy

@mbs59er @patschultzy Anyone is prey to trump. I see that with Iran. But I digress.

It was never plausible that Trump, a man who can get international supermodels anytime he wants them, would have sexually forced himself onto E Jean Carroll The perjury was obvious from the very beginning

@steveno93414721 “Known sex attacker”? Seriously?

@mbs59er The Court thought that a known sex attacker was a very plausible candidate for sexual assault. Hard to comprehend isn't it?

@WisconsinTim23 Because the jurors are idiot NYers.

@mbs59er Wow, why didn’t his defense use that brilliant argument in court? 😂😂😂

@jonnygo55 I have too many principles to be a lawyer

@mbs59er That’s your fucking argument? Good thing you aren’t a lawyer

@Xxx2ohio You don’t have much reasoning ability do you?

@mbs59er Not sure why you are arguing this with such passion. Do you like rapists? Do you like guys that shove their fingers into women's vaginas? Trump is a fucking creep. He bragged about grabbing women by the pussy. He was accused of assault by other women. Grow a fucking brain.

@KLOB715 Exactly

@mbs59er Why would a billionaire real estate tycoon be shopping for himself in a department store? So dumb.

@samtosane @patschultzy Pretty? No

@mbs59er @patschultzy If she is pretty, she is prey for trump?

@411s_Ben_Piper @patschultzy Proves that you’re a moron

@mbs59er @patschultzy Kind of proves jack shit

I don’t live in Texas but if I did I would’ve voted for Paxton over Cornyn and you bet I’d vote for him over Talarico Cornyn is a fake conservative and Talarico’s fake Christian act is so offensive that I can’t think of many people that I wouldn’t vote for just to see him lose

“Who are you to gatekeep Christianity?” is a question asked by people who aren’t Christians and don’t actually understand Christianity Talarico is like a Muslim telling his followers to eat pork and that women should be in charge of men

People who aren’t Christians and don’t understand Christianity will never understand why actual Christians are so offended by Talarico’s schtick that they’ll vote against him as long as the candidate is someone who will represent their political views