Chris McDonald

43.3K posts

Chris McDonald banner
Chris McDonald

Chris McDonald

@mcblimp95

North Carolina State University - B.S. of Meteorology and Geology - MGIST - PDGA #158212 - #TeamLoneStarDisc #TeamLSD #TeamFlippyDiscGolf

Rockingham Katılım Temmuz 2012
885 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@Andrew_Forrest1 @AllDayUNC I do like to look at pre-conference tourney ratings though. Especially using DSR (my new favorite tool cause I prefer usable metrics which RPI isn’t). VCU was 112th in Mondays update. Would put VCU middle of the pack 4-seed wise for the season compared to what RPI says today.
English
1
0
0
30
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@Andrew_Forrest1 @AllDayUNC Warren Nolan has UNC at 11-5 Q1, but I understand the premise of where you’re getting at here. With that said if you flip UNC and Auburn you probably get almost identical regional matchups either way. If it was a question of 8/9 then I’d get it more. But, 4/5 maybe not as much.
English
1
0
0
35
Andrew Forrest
Andrew Forrest@Andrew_Forrest1·
I’m aware. And that’s my whole point. When the metrics are so close, look at the actual games played. UNC was 24-11 in quad 1/quad 2 games compared to 27-19 for Auburn. Auburn played 34 total quad 1 games (went 17-17). That’s a ton, but UNC went 15-4 in quad 1 games. When things are this close, I’m giving the team with an almost 79% winning percentage in quad 1 games the edge.
English
2
0
0
41
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@ben_stana Cause one series doesn’t override an entire season worth of data points.
English
0
0
0
42
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@Andrew_Forrest1 @AllDayUNC UNC was also lower in KPI, and had a significantly lower NCSOS (assuming RPI SOS is used), which is also where the differences could be made. Plenty of arguments for either at 4 or 5.
English
1
0
0
32
Andrew Forrest
Andrew Forrest@Andrew_Forrest1·
@AllDayUNC They were 3rd in RPI. UNC was 4th. But UNC was higher in the NET and DSR.
English
1
0
2
166
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@evanscbb Ooo ooo now do wins against the field, conf SOS (any conf schedule in all of baseball), DSR, KPI, significant pitching injuries mid-year (gets one of those guys back this week), etc.
English
0
0
0
61
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@jwckauman @jordannhowelll Also, using one game is abysmal way to identify something given the format. I’ve seen teams lose by 10+ runs in Game 1 of a regional/super regional and then come back and win said regional. The ACCT format gives you no chance at that. Conf tourneys mean much less than folks want.
English
0
0
1
18
James (Jim) Auman
James (Jim) Auman@jwckauman·
@jordannhowelll Like I said, we didn't go into that game trying to prove anything because it didn't matter the outcome. If Avent thought it was win or die, he would not have gone with Andrews. I've seen State make it to the title game and not make the field, so ACCT is useless.
Raleigh, NC 🇺🇸 English
1
0
1
49
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@Hunter_Oakley You mean I pulled my exact words from the tweet you provided and said that and this add aren’t the same? The effort here was lazy.
English
0
0
0
14
Hunter Oakley
Hunter Oakley@Hunter_Oakley·
@mcblimp95 I send the tweet then I texted my buddy and said $100 he says these aren’t the same 🤣
English
1
0
0
33
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
RPI of 40th before this past week, none of the 8 bubble teams had a winning Q1 record (not many in the entire tournament), played the toughest ACC schedule (one of the toughest conf schedules in baseball), and was top-36 in KPI/DSR. Jacob, you couldn’t have provided worse info.
Jacob Rudner@JacobRudner

NC State made the field with an RPI outside the top 50, a losing record against Quad I opponents and a sub-.500 ACC record. That's bad news for Mercer, which had everything but a retiring coach.

English
0
0
6
715
ladd
ladd@NDW_13872·
@mcblimp95 @BogeySauceNC D1 has yall as 63rd team in and has moved ECU to better than last four in. Will be interesting the next few days with Mercer and the other bubble teams still alive
English
1
0
0
60
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
1. Elliot Avent had a phenomenal career and has done leaps and bounds for NC State. 2. Chris Hart, lead recruiter and 11-year AHC, I'd bet a lot of money on being the HC. 3. Even better strategy to announce this before the end of the week to further solidify a regional bid.
English
3
0
22
1.9K
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@MattAblesBurner @UNCballTalk Not remotely mad and I think that’s even more funny here. Even tried to help the ignorance and it was ignored. Can’t help the funky bunch. I do appreciate the laughs these days!
English
0
0
0
32
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@UNCballTalk @MattAblesBurner It was hilarious cause I could see what you were trying to accomplish and really dispersed a piss poor effort in trying to land it. Respect the effort but man yall have gotten lazy!
English
1
0
0
21
HubertsBurner
HubertsBurner@UNCballTalk·
@mcblimp95 @MattAblesBurner It was funny is why I tagged you. You’re the analytical guy, this coach is trying to cope and bring up pointless number (heads up, they don’t win you games) Analytics don’t mean a thing
English
1
0
1
48
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@MattAblesBurner @UNCballTalk I have you multiple different potentials of what he’s talking about, and in response I got zero clarification. Not angry at all. I respect that you thought you wouldn’t get options and pivoted valiantly.
English
0
0
0
28
Matt Able’s Burner
Matt Able’s Burner@MattAblesBurner·
@mcblimp95 @UNCballTalk You’re the metrics guy you’re supposed to know man. If you can’t answer the question it’s all good you don’t have to get angry
English
1
0
0
51
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@MattAblesBurner @UNCballTalk Not at all. Asked for clarification on his specific talking point, and no one seems to have that answer. It was a rather abysmal attempt to start.
English
1
0
0
18
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@MattAblesBurner @UNCballTalk I would’ve believed that had it not been in response to the original ignorance of the other burner. 1 v 1 I may have dug deeper or asked for further clarification.
English
1
0
0
20
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@UNCballTalk @MattAblesBurner Gotcha, so you actually have no idea what he’s talking about thus ignorantly tagging me like it was supposed to land, lol. Oh man that’s funny!
English
1
0
0
23
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@MattAblesBurner @UNCballTalk Don’t watch much NBA, so unsure what data points he’s referring to. Would’ve hoped y’all came with more context. Can’t help those not wanting to be helped here! The motive failed the convo.
English
1
0
0
21
Chris McDonald
Chris McDonald@mcblimp95·
@MattAblesBurner @UNCballTalk Expected data points can be wonky, and bad analytically. Do you know if he’s talking Points per Shot over expected, Points per Possession over expected, is it pre-game metric expectations based on lineups and projected play, etc. Plenty of analytics to find.
English
2
0
0
37