Muhammad Abdullah
618 posts


@worldranking_ And as usual the men showed up ready to rape her. Do you still think it's 'not all men'.Nah! It's every single one of you perverts. .
English

@shaqharvey @Bluedeux44k @NitzaltiBeYHWH @Deenresponds He comes with (not riding) clouds. Clouds symbolise armies. Plus only God rides fiery chariots until elijah. So is Elijah God? Pelach is not worship. Only pure mortals are given kingdom in OT and Daniel. God always gives.
English

@mdayaad @Bluedeux44k @NitzaltiBeYHWH @Deenresponds Irrelevant since the human figure rides on the clouds and is given the kingdom and worship something only God can do. Which was caiphas shouts as blaspheme before Jesus.
English

This is taken from the translation attributed to Hunayn b.Ishaq, a Nestorian Christian Arab from the 9th century, of the works of Artemidorus.
jesus uses “Doxe” to describe the son of man which involves the meaning of praise or glory. He is clearly the most glorified/praised figure besides god who will sit on the throne of God.
This matches the description of the prophet SAWS.


Mohammed Abd Al-Razack / محمد عبد الرزاق@MARazack26
When you're a 'da'ee' who distorts the meaning of "Ahmed" to give credibility to the bible in prophecising the prophet pbuh...
English

@L1lL3l @AdmiralKatheer We do have Nuh (as) living for 950 years. But that could just be a miracle. What experiment showed that a primate can live multiple hundreds of years with the correct protein?
English

@mdayaad @AdmiralKatheer The process. Then check very old human skeletons and see if we can somehow find those protein traces in it. But DNA and co doesnt preserve very well but there should be ways we can find.
English

@L1lL3l @AdmiralKatheer Yes kings fight in all eras. But not all kings. Many die naturally. But out of hundreds, not a single king ruled longer than modern people. Their calendar might have a few days more or less in a year. But that is not much. They kept track of seasons making their calendar similar.
English

@mdayaad @AdmiralKatheer There are a lot of assumptions in these like that 1 year was exactly 1 year of today. Moreover it could be not a sharp cut rather a steady decline so when we reach at Abraham's time it would be like this. But kings are not good subject data because back then kings would fight in+
English

@L1lL3l @AdmiralKatheer We know history up until more than 1500 years before the possible era of Ibrahim (as). But the kings of that time ruled for a similar time like later kings. There is nothing extraordinary that stands out.
English

@AdmiralKatheer Actually the generations could be long like 2000 year one. Because it is narrated that people were living longer before history and were taller. Meaning 10 generations would be 10000 years or so of we assume Adam pbuh lived longer like his children let's say 5000 years then+
English

@Budrus_Dhuliman @IsmailogluF And Catholics worship Mary and saints even if they think otherwise.
English

@mdayaad @IsmailogluF ilah means god. Ilah al-islam is Allah. Allah is ahad min al-alihat. if you worship sth, thats your god.
English

God being "third of the three" is a rhetorical reduction deconstructing trinitarian worship,pointing out the ontological issue:
regardless of claimed coequality when you worship the Father (⅓ of 3) or Jesus the Son (⅓ of 3) or the Spirit (⅓ of 3) you're dividing essence of God
Avedis❤️jesus🇱🇧🇦🇲🇺🇸@avedis2024
@lilyjayofficial Stupid the writer of qur3an he thought that allaho akbar third of three 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English

@Budrus_Dhuliman @IsmailogluF Ilah means anyone who is worshipped. You don't have to believe someone is part of a trinity and is coequal to Allah for it to be considered worship. Why can't you christians understand something so simple?
English

@Budrus_Dhuliman @IsmailogluF According to Quran, people even take your desires as ilah. There is a clear distinction between when Quran says Christians take Mary, monks, angels as ilah vs them considering Jesus as Allah. If the monk, angel verse isn't about trinity, the same should be said about Mary verse.
English

@Budrus_Dhuliman @IsmailogluF That verse is about taking another ilah. Not about making someone else Allah or equal to Allah. Other verses also mention taking monks and angels as ilah. None of these are about a group that consists of Allah and others. Or a group where everyone is Allah.
English

@mdayaad @IsmailogluF You and your mother as GODS thats tritheism.
English

@Budrus_Dhuliman @IsmailogluF That verse isn't about trinity. It is about catholics making dua to Mary.
English

@mdayaad @IsmailogluF Mary was called one of these three. Allahs question to Isa "you and your mother as gods besides me" implies that. Coran refutes christian herecies, not the Trinity. the terms Thalouth and Uqnoum were unknown to A&M.
English

@Budrus_Dhuliman @IsmailogluF The phrase third of three doesn't imply order. It just means one of three. 9:40 is a similar case. Mary is never called one of 3. The one you call Father is God or Allah and the other 2 aren't. So yes you make God or Allah one of three.
English

@IsmailogluF Third of three refers to Tritheism, Isa, Miryam and Allah.
English

@avedis2024 @lilyjayofficial Because the person whom you call Father is God or Allah. Son and holy spirit are not. So you do make God one of the three. Third of three just means one of three in arabic. Just like how Prophet was called second of two in 9:40 even though he was older and superior than Abu Bakr.
English

@lilyjayofficial Stupid the writer of qur3an he thought that allaho akbar third of three
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

English

@Mister_mister_h @IsmailogluF This verse isn't about trinity. It is about catholics praying to Mary and saints (they refuse to call it prayer but it is prayer).
English

With all due respect, it does not deconstruct trinitiarianism as I believe it. We should be careful not to read into texts things we would like it to say. There is other ayats that defy the divinity of Jesus in the Quran, that is for sure. But the trinity that is mentioned here in the Quran in 5:116, I would consider that teaching blasphemy as well. (I am a christian by the way).

English


@LordDiososceles @Deenresponds How do you know what battles alexander fought?
English

If you were paying attention he conceded the author of the Quran added details that he didn’t hear also such as samiri making the Golden calf.
This shows that the Author of the Quran believes it’s an authority and doesn’t care about what the bible says. Thus islamic dilemma is debunked.
That’s why when he conceded the samiri point chris was trying to interrupt.
Sara H (Apostate of Allah)@apostateofallah
@InspiringPhilos @N08504711 @Deenresponds IP: he’s editing the stories he’s hearing. Ortho-Muslim: beautiful —— that’s how you know he wasn’t actually listening to you.
English

@LordDiososceles @Deenresponds Almost all books we read contain mistakes and we simply ignore those parts.
English

@Deenresponds Relies on prior scripture ➡️ edits it ➡️still cites it as confirmation.
That’s circular reasoning.
English

@Phemmy070 @Deenresponds You guys don't believe in a unipersonal God like the OT. Stop projecting.
English

@Deenresponds Is that why the Author turned Aaron from The Chief Priest to a prophet?
Is that why He left out the whole levitical ceremony WELL documented in torah?
You debunked nothing. You just added the the load of evidences for the islamic dilemma
English

@NitzaltiBeYHWH @Jay81724942 @Deenresponds Every book we rely on for history has inconsistent details and we don't accept those details.
English

@Jay81724942 @Deenresponds So when it disagrees it's corrupted 😄😄
English

@shaqharvey @Bluedeux44k @NitzaltiBeYHWH @Deenresponds Bar enosh is just the aramaic translation of ben adam. Daniel didn't use it as a title. He was simply saying this figure is humane unlike the previous beastly kingdoms.
English

@Bluedeux44k @NitzaltiBeYHWH @Deenresponds The words and references are not the same. Son of man (bar adam) is the common reference to any human figure. Son of man figure in Daniel 7(bar enosh) is a figure that is given divine prerogative and association.
English

Liar!!!
The Son of Man comes in the glory of His father!
Allah is not a father.
Mark 8:38 Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.
English

May Allah bless Zakir Naik for all the great Dawah he does but this is not a prophecy to use of Mohammed SAWS in the bible.
Dr Zakir Naik@drzakiranaik
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) Prophesied in the Bible — Old Testament "And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned." The Holy Bible — Isaiah 29:12
English





