Mega is not your guy

OFFICIAL ADDRESS ON THE SABIGAL MATTER I’ve intentionally stayed off the conversation around this situation because I haven’t been very active on Twitter lately. However, once my name began to be consistently associated with the issue, I took time to properly look into it. I had a direct conversation with Sabi Gal earlier today, and from my findings, there was a clear lapse in how a particular class was handled, specifically the TLS 2.0 (2025 set). During that call with her, she made it clear that her other class sets are satisfied with their experience and outcomes. But from my findings, The concern to me primarily centers around the TLS 2.0 set, which unfortunately did not receive the same level of structure and delivery the other sets did. This period, as she mentioned coincided with a very challenging time in her life, and as a result, the structure and delivery of that set were not properly executed. Which is not an excuse‼️ That said, context does not remove responsibility. Another primary issue here is that a new set of students was taken on while the needs of the previous set had not been fully met. That is a failure in standard, and it is acknowledged. To everyone affected, I sincerely apologize for the experience and the gap in delivery. She is still growing, and like anyone in that phase, mistakes can happen. What matters is how they are addressed and corrected. Moving forward, I have given clear directives. ▫️She would tender a formal address to her community tomorrow when puts herself together ▫️All affected students will be contacted directly. ▫️Structured resolutions will be communicated transparently and provided with immediate effect to ensure they receive the value they paid for. ▫️This process will be handled transparently and with urgency A defined standard for mentorship delivery will also be established and enforced. I will also be personally overseeing this resolution process to ensure accountability and prevent any recurrence. At this point, the focus is not on prolonging the issue, but on executing solutions and restoring trust. Your voices have been heard. The constructive feedback has been taken seriously, and actions are already in motion. Let me be clear, My brand is built on results and integrity and I take situations like this seriously when I’m being put in the picture. Those affected will be attended to, and satisfaction will be prioritized. We move forward with better structure, better standards, and better accountability. And if you think there are other concerns not discussed, drop it intelligently in the comment. Thank you for your attention to this matter God bless us Techriztm

OFFICIAL ADDRESS ON THE SABIGAL MATTER I’ve intentionally stayed off the conversation around this situation because I haven’t been very active on Twitter lately. However, once my name began to be consistently associated with the issue, I took time to properly look into it. I had a direct conversation with Sabi Gal earlier today, and from my findings, there was a clear lapse in how a particular class was handled, specifically the TLS 2.0 (2025 set). During that call with her, she made it clear that her other class sets are satisfied with their experience and outcomes. But from my findings, The concern to me primarily centers around the TLS 2.0 set, which unfortunately did not receive the same level of structure and delivery the other sets did. This period, as she mentioned coincided with a very challenging time in her life, and as a result, the structure and delivery of that set were not properly executed. Which is not an excuse‼️ That said, context does not remove responsibility. Another primary issue here is that a new set of students was taken on while the needs of the previous set had not been fully met. That is a failure in standard, and it is acknowledged. To everyone affected, I sincerely apologize for the experience and the gap in delivery. She is still growing, and like anyone in that phase, mistakes can happen. What matters is how they are addressed and corrected. Moving forward, I have given clear directives. ▫️She would tender a formal address to her community tomorrow when puts herself together ▫️All affected students will be contacted directly. ▫️Structured resolutions will be communicated transparently and provided with immediate effect to ensure they receive the value they paid for. ▫️This process will be handled transparently and with urgency A defined standard for mentorship delivery will also be established and enforced. I will also be personally overseeing this resolution process to ensure accountability and prevent any recurrence. At this point, the focus is not on prolonging the issue, but on executing solutions and restoring trust. Your voices have been heard. The constructive feedback has been taken seriously, and actions are already in motion. Let me be clear, My brand is built on results and integrity and I take situations like this seriously when I’m being put in the picture. Those affected will be attended to, and satisfaction will be prioritized. We move forward with better structure, better standards, and better accountability. And if you think there are other concerns not discussed, drop it intelligently in the comment. Thank you for your attention to this matter God bless us Techriztm

There’s honestly no obligation for me to explain anything, but out of respect for those who genuinely believe in GT, I’ll address this. Some of the conversations happening on X lately are concerning. It raises a serious question, are some of you actually trading the markets, or are you only active on social media? Because based on what I’m seeing, a lot of you clearly lack basic trading knowledge. Let me address two major points that keep coming up. First, the issue of “no cents” on my profits, both running and closed. On Exness, which is the broker I use, once you are trading from 10 lots and above, profits do not display in cents. It shows clean figures. This is not speculation it’s a platform reality. The reason many of you don’t know this is simple, you’ve never traded at that volume. And instead of verifying this on a demo account, you choose to argue about what you don’t understand. Second, the claim that my profits are “edited” because they appear as clean figures like $20,000, $40,000, or $100,000. Let me break it down. If I enter a trade, for example on gold, at a price like 5071.334 and I target a specific number of pips say 100 pips, I can simply set my take profit at 5081.334. Notice the decimal precision. That level of control allows me to close trades at exact figures, resulting in clean profit numbers. There’s no trick just precision and understanding of how pricing works. What’s disappointing is that instead of learning, many choose to criticize what they don’t understand. The truth is, real traders are focused on the charts, on execution, and on consistency not spending their time dragging others online. Now think about this. I have over 3,500 people on my channels, including those on the Flip channel paying $1,000 monthly. If what people are claiming were true, wouldn’t at least one person have come forward by now to discredit me? Just one? Yet, none has. That should tell you something. To those who have followed my setups both free and paid you already know the value. The results speak for themselves. At the end of the day, this is bigger than online arguments. Time does not wait for anyone. The same energy some of you invest in criticizing others could be used to actually learn, grow, and improve your trading. Because five years from now, the gap will only widen, those who focused on growth will be ahead, and those who chose distraction will still be in the same place. This isn’t an insult, it’s advice. Use your time wisely.

re-entering your prime after a long downfall >>>>

🎂