michael

🚨 THE RACIST TRAIL OF DEATH THEY HID FROM AMERICA: Black Supremacist “Kill All Whites” Massacre of 6 Innocent Hikers & Dog Walkers – 9-Year Media Blackout EXPOSED Six innocent White Americans — hikers, dog walkers, a bus rider, a woman in her tent — executed in cold blood along Kansas City’s Indian Creek Trail. Not random. Not “mental illness” alone. Fredrick Demond Scott, a Black man who had already vowed to “kill all white people,” hunted them down one by one between 2016 and 2017: John Palmer, 54 David Lenox, 67 Timothy Rice, 57 Michael Darby, 61 Karen Harmeyer, 64 Steven Gibbons, 57 Shot without warning. Bodies left like discarded trash. He was arrested in 2017. Nine years of endless “competency hearings.” Nine years of taxpayer-funded delays while families waited for justice. A judge finally ruled him fit in 2025. Trial? Fall 2026. Mainstream media? Barely a whisper. No primetime specials. No “systemic racism” panels. No FBI hate-crime task force. Because this massacre doesn’t fit the sacred narrative. When the shooter’s skin color and the victims’ skin color reverse the approved script, the story simply vanishes. This isn’t journalism. This is narrative enforcement — the quiet erasure of inconvenient victims. Every life lost to racial hatred deserves the same fury. Every family deserves the same spotlight. The selective outrage isn’t compassion. It’s complicity. America, wake up. Truth doesn’t have a preferred race. #IndianCreekMassacre #MediaBlackout #HateCrimeHypocrisy #SelectiveOutrage #NarrativeCollapse #ForgottenVictims #EqualJusticeNow

🚨BREAKING: A sickening ruling has sparked outrage: Three teenage boys who gang-raped two girls — while filming the attacks on their phones, laughing, and cheering each other on — have been given zero jail time. Judge Nicholas Rowland said he wanted to “avoid criminalising these children unnecessarily” and focus on their “reintegration into society.” The victims? Completely betrayed by the system. This is what happens when judges prioritize rapists over justice. Disgusting. The UK justice sytem is completely broken!

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump just called for the SAVE AMERICA ACT to be rammed through, and the New York crowd erupted "It's voter ID, it's proof of citizenship, and mail-in voting is a DISASTER." "It's the SAVE AMERICA ACT!" 🇺🇸 GET IT DONE. Call off recess!

Look at this worthless sack of shit named Thomas Caleb Butler. This deranged liberal coward brutally beat a 69-year-old veteran to near death, all because the old man’s Trump decorations triggered his fragile snowflake ass. The veteran is now clinging to life on a ventilator and might not survive. I’m getting so tired of this. It never stops.

Some of you might have noticed that there have been repeated attempts to create a "two-state solution" in Eretz Israel (or "Palestine" if you want) and that it never works. The primary reason it never works is that the "Palestinian" side of it and its terror groups reject it. The reason they reject it can be found in the 1988 Hamas Charter explicitly, which declares that they recognize the entire region as having been set aside as Islamic Waqf since the seventh century. This is a doctrine within Islam and Sharia and, as you should expect, the Muslim Brotherhood and its derivatives take it extremely strictly and literally. The doctrine of waqf is probably 98% of the reason why the Middle East is the way that it is with regard to the (modern) state of Israel, but almost nobody ever actually seems to recognize this. The doctrine of Waqf is roughly an Islamic land trust, although the "owner" of that land is taken literally to be Allah once it has been declared waqf. Since Allah "owns" it, it is fully "Dar al-Islam" (land of Islam) in a fully irrevocable, permanent, and inalienable way. No one can have any ownership of the land, but certain Muslims in good standing can hold stewardship of it. No one else can. It cannot be sold. It cannot be traded. It doesn't matter if it is conquered by a thousand armies. The land is viewed under Sharia as inalienably Islamic and belonging to Allah. The doctrine sees land under waqf as having been subdued or purified under Islamic doctrine. The land has been returned to its pristine state, in some sense. It is therefore regarded as an unholy defilement for anyone to make any claim upon the land, no matter how legitimate, old, or under any circumstances. To sell the land as a Muslim steward, especially to a Jew, is to incur a fatwa against you and your family (a capital offense). To occupy the land is the same. People who believe this in the way the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, ISIS, ISIL, etc., believe it, believe these things literally. They believe they have a holy obligation to murder anyone involved in what they see as a desecration of Allah's pristine Dar al-Islam land, and they act upon it. There is no possibility of compromise, partition, sharing, or any other such thing with people who believe this doctrine in this way. None. Ever. Under any circumstances. Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc., believe that in the late 7th century when the Muslim Caliph conquered all of Syria-Palaestina ("Palestine") and declared it waqf (specifically in part so Jews could never return), that was final and irrevocable. The case is closed. There can never be so much as a serious discussion of any change. Therefore, when the Allies, particularly British and French forces, conquered the Ottomans in 1917 and issued the Balfour Declaration, effectively taking control of the land as conquered territory under their management ("British Mandate Palestine" and "French Mandate Syria"), they had absolutely no legal standing to do so under Sharia, from the Islamist perspective. They could conquer people but not Allah or his irrevocable claim on the land. When the League of Nations ratified the Mandates in the following years, the same. When the United Nations attempted to issue a partition in 1947, the same. When Israel declared independence in 1948, the same. When the Arab armies attacked and lost the next day, this did nothing to strengthen their case for legal occupation of the land. When a million attempted partition and two-state solutions were proposed only to be rejected by the Arab Palestinians every time, this is ultimately why. Almost all the rest is window dressing and taqiyyah. The issue is seeing the land as Islamic Waqf under Sharia, to which the Muslim Islamists have submitted. The Muslim Brotherhood (thus Hamas, etc.) doctrine on submission is that you fully accept all of this as I have stated it or you are not a real Muslim at all. You are apostate, and your life is in danger, if not forfeit, unless you will change your ways, perhaps under duress. Do you understand? Either you think this way, or the MB and its affiliate terror organizations do not recognize you as a Muslim to begin with, so your opinion is as irrelevant and moot as a Westerner, a Christian, an infidel, or a Jew. If you are taking the "Palestinian" side in these conflicts or see Israel as intrinsically the aggressor, provocateur, problem, etc., in the region, you are implicitly endorsing the Sharia and the doctrine of waqf that is the overwhelming primary reason for those beliefs. Full stop. You're supporting a view only intelligible under Sharia. Waqf, the idea of Allah owning land in religious trust, is a uniquely Sharia doctrine. It does not exist anywhere else. Israel obtained nearly all the land in Eretz Israel legally. The Allied Forces (that's us, fam) beat the Central Powers in WWI, including the Ottoman Empire, and took the entire region from them. All international law recognized it, including the League of Nations and later United Nations, and no serious challenge to that legal reality was ever made. Zionists bought land there, often from Ottoman landlords, and slowly moved in. Almost all immigration was legal with the only illegal immigration being during WWII when the British limited legal immigration in order to appease the Mufti. When Britain withdrew in 1947, the United Nations suggested the partition, and only the Arabs rejected it. Under every system of law that might apply except Sharia, the people we recognize as Israelis today moved in legally. It was not "settler occupation" except under Sharia. We are not under any obligation to recognize Sharia, or, therefore, waqf. We do not need to care what they believe about ownership of that land under their religious-political doctrine, especially since they try to hide the ball behind displacement, Arab nationalism, and some claimed right to self-determination (which they lost in wars that they always started, with the exception of WWI, which the Central Powers including the Ottomans started). The fig leaf they hide waqf behind here is this claim to self-determining pan-Arab nationalism, but what it actually means to have self-determination is to be able to determine the land is irrevocably theirs under Sharia because of waqf. If you don't recognize Sharia as legitimately binding international law, then you don't recognize the "Palestinian's" claim on the land of Eretz Israel, including Judea or Samaria (the "West Bank"), or Gaza for that matter (which was held by the Egyptians). Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Missing the point completely If the majority of Muslims - the non-radical ones - are not in favour of radical Islam, could some of them start speaking out and saying so What is the reason why they are not doing this ?

I am deeply grateful for the trust President Trump placed in me and for the opportunity to lead @ODNIgov for the last year and a half. Unfortunately, I must submit my resignation, effective June 30, 2026. My husband, Abraham, has recently been diagnosed with an extremely rare form of bone cancer. He faces major challenges in the coming weeks and months. At this time, I must step away from public service to be by his side and fully support him through this battle.

Today, with great humility and sincere appreciation, I shared the below letter with President Trump. It has been a profound honor to serve the American people as DNI.

To teach Israel how to make peace, Pippa Bacca, the leftist Italian, decided in 2004 to hitchhike from Turkey to Israel. She even learned basic Arabic, to prove that Islam is not a violent. Once she arrived in Turkey, she was gang-raped and murdered. She was 33 years old.

On January 6th I followed the crowd into the Capitol and shouted. Police stood by the whole time, hanging out with us and sometimes directing us places. At one point near the House Chambers I was walking downstairs when a trio of some special section, secret service looking men started pointing guns in my direction. Confused and annoyed, I walked the other way and when I saw a normal police officer asked him why they were doing that. He informed me a protestor (Ashli Babbit) had been killed, and advised me to leave the building. I walked towards the exit and after a short rest on the bench I left. I harmed nobody and damaged no property that day and complied with all police orders. What I received for that was a pre-dawn raid at my parents house, where my 1 month post-partum wife and I were staying, on Biden's first day in office. His DOJ had signed the order to arrest me 3 hours after his inauguration. In the subsequent weeks I received death threats online and harassing phone calls, something that would be ongoing for the next few years. I was banned from Meta and Paypal. My wife and I were both debanked by PNC and banned from Airbnb. My wife was detained at the airport for hours with our newborn daughter. I was charged with 4 misdemeanors and the 1512 unconstitutional felony. The government offered to drop the misdemeanors if I pled to the felony. The felony was a lie, so I refused and went to trial. At trial the prosecution for 2 days straight was allowed to show footage to the jury of things that occurred around the Capitol I wasn't present for "for context." When we asked to put forward footage that contradicted the prosecution's "context" we were not allowed. They could show what they wanted, we could not. Police officers were then put on the stand for the next 2 days who cried about their experiences. I had no idea who they were. They admitted they never saw me or interacted with me. Nevertheless like every other J6er, I lost, and was sentenced to 4 years and $22k in fines and restitution. Yet even after the Supreme Court overturned the felony, the judge would not let me out until my misdemeanor sentences of a year were maxed out. Because she can't count she actually kept me in longer - to the extent she intervened at the last minute to make the prison release me on a Sunday, something that is against BOP rules. My family sat outside the prison gates the Friday before practically the whole day waiting in vain because of this pettiness. But the government wasn't satisfied with their pound of flesh: after my release they took me back in for resentencing, to attempt to have me resentenced after the fact to my misdemeanors consecutively, so I'd be taken from my family again and have another 1.5 years behind bars. This time I won, as they had no legal precedent and it skirted on violating double jeopardy since I had served my full prison time. Even still, it cast a cloud over the holidays and cost me another 20k my family couldn't afford. People ask whether prison was bad, and yeah of course prison sucked. It was a hard and violent place. I was present for a stabbing, and was lucky to avoid two fights and a race war. But dealing with Biden's DOJ and the DC Judiciary was the real trauma - they would grind down your spirit by weaponizing the legal system and use the endless procedure to bankrupt you. I had nightmares for months after release that I had somehow been hit with new charges. By the time I was pardoned by President Trump, I had spent literally every single day of Biden's presidency either in prison or under some form of supervision. I had incurred over $300k in legal fees and over $1 million in lost business. It was a reign of terror, and yet it was a mere foreshadowing of what they had planned for anyone else who opposed them under Kamala. The country should never forget it.

This is what Palestinians did in October 7th. Bodies burnt alive. Females stripped naked. This is what Zohran Mamdani’s wife celebrated.

An Iranian 🇮🇷 woman: "Islam is not our religion in Iran. Islam was forced on us through torture, killing, beheading, raping, and enslaving Iranians to become Muslims. Iranians, Persians, were actually Zoroastrians." This needs to be shared every single day.

🚨 JUST IN: Leader John Thune is facing MASSIVE outrage after sending the Senate HOME to miss President Trump’s June 1 ICE and CBP funding deadline Absolutely infuriating. WE JUST WANT THEM TO DO THEIR JOBS! Stop vacationing and start VOTING.

🇬🇧 Henry Nowak was stabbed 5 times and died at 18. Police showed up, and handcuffed the victim instead. Why? The suspect claimed racial abuse and denied the knife. The bodycam footage is damning… Justice for Henry.

A foreign billionaire just did the job the entire British press wouldn't. @elonmusk asked the question every newsroom in this country should have been screaming for months. Who are the officers that handcuffed a dying boy and let him bleed out in the street? Who are they, and why are they still in a job? Not the BBC. Not Sky. Not GB News. A bloke in Texas with no stake in this country. They had the story. They let it die. He picked it back up, called it unconscionable, and offered to fund a wrongful death lawsuit. The answer to his question? Silence. Still. This is Henry Nowak. First year student. Walking home from a night out with his football team. A wounded teenager telling officers he couldn't breathe, and the response was handcuffs, not an ambulance. A boy dies like this on a British street and it should never have left the front page. It should have been the reckoning that didn't stop until someone answered for it. Instead it took a man who owes us nothing to drag it back into the light. Not one officer named. Not one suspended. The watchdog is investigating now, and only now, because the pressure came from a website and not a single news desk in this country. Ordinary people never needed permission to care. They raised over £40,000 for Henry at a charity football match in his memory. That is the Britain that still has a pulse. The one that doesn't wait to be told who's allowed to matter. When the richest man on earth has to do your journalism for you, what exactly is the British press for? So let me ask you the question they wouldn't. Did you see Henry's name on the news? Or did you have to find it here? Henry Nowak. 18 years old. Walking home. He should have made it.

Israeli witness recounts seeing Palestinian civilians laugh as they raped a woman who they pulled out of a car. They then slaughtered her with a knife and continued to rape the dead body, laughing. These civilians then went on to find a couple running away and they butchered the couple with axes and knives. Palestinian civilians came prepared to butcher and torture Jews on October 7 prepared with axes and knives.

Candace Owens knew Hunter Biden was sexual inappropriate with his underage niece. Yet, she gave a glazing puff piece interview to Hunter Biden anyway. Candace Owens is a pedo protector.

SEATTLE: Authorities put up the islamic regime flag in the lead-up to the World Cup. Iranians in the area knew what needed to be done, and acted. There will be no more tolerance for Khomeini's fake crab flag. I applaud this absolute patriot.

Just a reminder that the address Ilhan was trying to send $1.4M but was blocked by the GOP, has recieved $400k multiple times!!

And this is: The Capitol Police cuffed an FBI-paid confidential human source, led him to the side, uncuffed him, and gave him a fist bump. In other words, the January 6 “attack” was a criminal conspiracy — instigated by Nancy Pelosi and others — carried out by Christopher Wray to set the stage and entrap Trump supporters, allowing the illegitimate, unelected terrorist organization to brand them as domestic terrorists. So why the hell haven’t the rest of the f**king tapes been released yet?