Mikko Paulo Guevarra
237 posts
New futures plan tomorrow.
Lower price. Lower daily target. Every rule on the table before you pay.
What number are you pricing it at? Drop your guess!
4 AM CT
Galib@Galib_FN
$300M Paid to 120K+ Traders Worldwide. Time to FLEX?
English
@fnfutures My guess for FundedNext Futures 100k Flex is: 149.99$
English
If you don't have a profitable trading strategy yet reply to this post and I'll dm you one.
(follow so I can actually DM you)
English
@FundedNext Thanks to the team for taking the time to review and resolve the case.
Also big thanks to @flynn and the Discord mods for the support 🙏
Lesson: always keep your logs and be ready to verify everything.
English
Update on my previous issue with @FundedNext 👇
After reviewing my MT5 logs and sharing detailed evidence, the risk violation on my account has now been officially REVOKED.
Key points:
• SL was placed within ~16 seconds
• Risk was ~0.53% on a 50K account
• SL moved to be
English
Top 5 countries by performance rewards paid out at FundedNext in the first week of March:
🇮🇹 Italy: $241,635
🇳🇬Nigeria: $144,350
🇮🇳 India: $137,638
🇬🇧 United Kingdom: $122,750
🇵🇰 Pakistan: $77,119
Trading skills do not belong to one region, nor do the rewards.
English
5X faster in CFDs and 3X faster in Futures!
We promise our traders to disburse every performance reward within 24 hours.
But we are a lot faster than that.
Last week's data:
CFDs Avg = 4.61 hours (5X faster)
Futures Avg = 7.50 hours (3X faster)
The same standard. Every single time.
English
Mikko Paulo Guevarra@mikzpg10
@FundedNext @FundedNext flagged my trade as 100% risk for “no stop loss” — but I DID set SL. Issue? During partial close + SL adjustment, their system counts even a split-second gap as no SL → violation. Result: • 50% profit deducted • no logs provided • no manual review
QME
🚨 Public Warning for Traders, BEWARE of FundedNext’s practices. (evidence attached) @FundedNext
My funded account was terminated after successfully completing Phases 1 and 2 over six weeks of consistent trading.
Their justification?
👉 An allegation of “copy trading” on ONE single day.
Here are the facts:
I traded almost daily for six weeks, consistently.
Same instruments throughout: NAS100 and Gold.
Same strategy, same execution style.
FundedNext confirmed my trading was compliant for the entire period, except for that one day.
The trades on that day were not all executed at the same time, which directly contradicts the definition of copy trading.
I provided my trading strategy, which fully explains the activity. Also offered to share trading logs, trade live via sharing my screen etc.
Let’s apply common sense.
Who spends six weeks carefully passing a challenge, following every rule, only to suddenly copy trade right before completing Phase 2?
It is not credible.
What makes this worse:
After blocking my progression to a $200,000 funded account, FundedNext told me I was welcome to continue trading and buy more accounts.
So, allegedly, I broke their rules badly enough to lose my funded account…
But not badly enough to stop them from taking more money from me.
That contradiction speaks for itself.
This appears to be a pattern:
Traders who fail challenges are fine.
Traders who win and approach large funded accounts are blocked.
Fees are collected, rules are retroactively enforced, and payouts are avoided.
Prop firms are said to be like a casino model, which is fine if we know what we are getting.
Casinos don’t take your entry fee, let you win under the rules, then refuse to pay. This is closer to fraud!
I am attaching screenshots and evidence.
I encourage anyone affected to:
Report this to your country's Trading Standards/consumer protection agency.
File a bank chargeback for fraud.
Speak publicly so this behaviour is documented.
Share and like this post, please, to help other traders.
⚠️ Traders deserve transparency and fair treatment.
I have been told by many sources that their Trustpilot page is full of fake reviews, and they have many dummy accounts on social media claiming XYZ payouts.
The reality is, they will go above and beyond to stop you from getting paid, as proven.
For those going through the same issues, feel free to DM me. As soon as I said I was going to report them and go public, they refunded me.
Let's even have a look at that. You claim I broke the rules, you claim I am in the wrong, yet you have given me a full refund?
AND told me I can buy more accounts! These guys need shutting down ASAP!
Key things to do, to get your money back...report them to your bank as fraud and issue a chargeback.
File complaints to CYSEC, FCA, and UAE SCA.
For the US, go to CFTC, the NFA and the FTC.
You can Google all the above for contact info. But it's a must that we all do this, to protect others.
Most traders fail via prop firms because trading is hard, but with the extra rules, it's close to impossible.
The ones who go through blood, sweat and tears to get there and stick to the rules, but still get shut down because of shady practices, it need to stop now!
@FundedNext @fnfutures
English
Mikko Paulo Guevarra@mikzpg10
@FundedNext @FundedNext flagged my trade as 100% risk for “no stop loss” — but I DID set SL. Issue? During partial close + SL adjustment, their system counts even a split-second gap as no SL → violation. Result: • 50% profit deducted • no logs provided • no manual review
QME
🚨ALERT: @FundedNext TERMINATES $200K FUNDED ACCOUNT AFTER PASSING BOTH PHASES🚨
A trader passes BOTH phases successfully.
Completes KYC.
Does the requested video interview.
And then BOOM
Account terminated.
Their reason?
“Someone might have helped during the interview.”
How is that even possible?
It was a live video interview conducted on THEIR own platform no pauses, no interruptions, no third-party involvement.
This is not just unfair.
This is unacceptable.
Let’s be honest it feels like cases only get solved when they go viral on X.
Instead of resolving issues properly via chat support, traders are forced to create public engagement just to get basic justice.
Is this how a professional prop firm operates?
If everything was done correctly:
• KYC submitted ✅
• Video interview completed ✅
• Both phases passed legitimately ✅
Then why terminate a funded account?
Selective enforcement?
Influencer favoritism?
Or just avoiding payouts?
Traders deserve transparency.
Traders deserve consistency.
Traders deserve respect.
If you’re confident in your system,stand by your traders not silence them.
#propfirmmedia📈
English
Mikko Paulo Guevarra@mikzpg10
@FundedNext @FundedNext flagged my trade as 100% risk for “no stop loss” — but I DID set SL. Issue? During partial close + SL adjustment, their system counts even a split-second gap as no SL → violation. Result: • 50% profit deducted • no logs provided • no manual review
QME
🚨 @FundedNext What Kind of Logic Is This? 🚨
Trader risks 0.2% per trade, uses proper stop loss, takes two setups, closes both trades.
And somehow this becomes “one-sided betting.”
So now:
Risk limited to 1%
Now even normal trading with proper risk is a problem?
At this point traders aren’t trading the market they’re guessing what excuse the risk team will use next.
Sell trade? Problem.
Buy trade later? Problem.
Risk management? Still a problem.
If 0.2% risk trades are considered abuse, maybe the issue isn’t the trader.
Maybe the issue is the firm.
Stop hiding behind vague rules and start respecting traders.
#propfirmmedia📈
English
@mikzpg10 @FundedNext why didnt you put sl right after? this is definitely a violation
English
@mikzpg10 @FundedNext you think we all will believe your bs? know the difference between split seconds and 3 mins first
English
@FundedNext @FundedNext flagged my trade as 100% risk for “no stop loss” — but I DID set SL.
Issue? During partial close + SL adjustment, their system counts even a split-second gap as no SL → violation.
Result:
• 50% profit deducted
• no logs provided
• no manual review
English