Tony

@CARDGUYALERTS Move fast, hurry up and wait!! To then get to under a minute to be re-queued back to 35 mins...rinse and repeat again. @Topps is really messing up the hobby for the average collector.

🔴 LIVE NOW — 2025-26 Bowman Basketball Pre Order 🔴 tinyurl.com/34tez9x7 Move FAST 💨 #Topps #SportsCards #NBA

@YoucapperSports @Topps Same story here ! What a clusterfuck

Me: less than a minute to check out!!! @Topps: nah…the breakers didn’t sell us out yet. Wait another 36 minutes…

@golfhackerdave @CardPurchaser Still waiting here.....48 minutes to go until they say Sold Out 😂

Anyone have any luck with Bowman basketball pre-order? I am in queue...for 109 minutes lol sure Topps, sure @CardPurchaser

@LauraLoomer @megynkelly @TuckerCarlson #JigsawFace

A lot of people recently commented on how @megynkelly has a rule on her show that her guests aren’t allowed to attack Tucker Carlson. The reason for this is because Megyn and @TuckerCarlson’s shows are both run by Red Seat Ventures, which is now ironically owned by Fox Corp, which owns Fox News. Red Seat Ventures wants to have a monopoly over all conservative podcasting, which is why Tucker and Megyn have a vested interest in attacking all of the conservative competition in Independent media. It’s ironic that Fox Corp now owns Red Seat Ventures. In a sense, the toxic culture and anti-American and anti-Jewish rhetoric coming out of their shows is attributable to Fox Corp. It appears that the commentators who push the most deranged Jew hate and Islamic sympathizing content are all partnered with Red Seat Ventures. @redseatventures. Megyn Kelly has a business interest in not going after Red Seat, as it produces both her show and Tucker’s show. Red Seat Ventures has a total interest in attacking every other conservative commentator with a large following because they want to serve as the gatekeepers for all conservative podcasts. Megyn and Tucker pretend to be principled, but this is further evidence all they care about is money. Some of the other people managed by Red Seat Ventures include: @piersmorgan @imbrettcooper @BillOReilly @JesseKellyDC @seanspicer @RitaPanahi @DLoesch @JillianMichaels @itslinklauren @MarkHalperin @kilmeade @willcain @guypbenson @Gutfeldfox It almost seems like a deliberate sabotage campaign by Fox Corp to create an anti-Trump media campaign against President Trump outside of Fox News to destroy MAGA and undermine President Trump. Very deceptive. Funny how Megyn and Tucker always speak badly about Fox News when Fox Corp owns Red Seat Ventures. Just more deception from the Woke Reich.

@PlayoffLakers_ Done. 🏀 @CardPurchaser @JayTC53 @thatguybiggg @JustinMcElroy @EmilyMcCann94

🚨 NIKOLA JOKIC SIGNED AND FRAMED JERSEY GIVEAWAY (With NBA authentication) To enter you MUST complete all steps 1. Follow @PlayoffLakers_ 2. Like and Repost this post 3. Comment Done Bonus entry: 1 additional entry for each friend you tag (Max 5 bonus entries per person)

@Topps Did you know we don’t like EQL releases? 👀

@iCop4Retail @SneakerPhetish @benjamin_ACD @EQLofficial Agreed

@SneakerPhetish @benjamin_ACD @EQLofficial unfortunately that’s the stigma around EQL, we are not the only people who feel like this obvs. i would feel better if they came out with results and showed us factual analytics on how/who is decided to be picked. Don’t give us the whole recipe but prove to us it’s not a scam.

So, hypothetically, if the Virgil Abloh Archive uses @EQLofficial to raffle off the AJ1 Alaska, ya’ll aren’t entering right? Or you’re still gonna enter but complain about how much you hate EQL for attention? Lol

@MAGACult2 I'm just going to sit here and continue to flex my quads in my short shorts.

Maga, we are much smarter than your news anchors also. Not really, but they’re just lying to you and you’re not able to figure it out. You give them way too much credence and credit where we can discredit everyone of them.

@LauraLoomer @imelizabethlane @MrsErikaKirk

@imelizabethlane Weird that you would say this. This is how I feel when I see Candace Owens… not @MrsErikaKirk.

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is. I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath. What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain: That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her. Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.) Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance. Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity. Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure. Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power. What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker. Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride. What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time. In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks! It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely! Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing. Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came. What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion. This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

@grok @CinemaShogun @RealCandaceO In other words, get a fucking life @CinemaShogun

@minnesocal @CinemaShogun @RealCandaceO Based on my analysis of search results from the last 4 months, approximately 70% of CinemaShogun's posts mention "Candace". This is an estimate, as exact counts are hard to obtain due to high post volume.

Candace Owens wanted to be the woman on his arm. That’s where a lot of this animosity against Erika Kirk comes from. Any one else agree?

@CinemaShogun @RealCandaceO @grok what percentage of @cinemashogun's X posts have mentioned the name Candace over the last 4 months?

@CinemaShogun Honest questions here, why are 90% of your posts over the last 4 months related to @RealCandaceO ? Are you paid by Israel, or do you just not have a personal life? Or both?

@CinemaShogun @Waitin4Better Unoriginal, but very relevant.

@Waitin4Better Unoriginal

@IlhanMN 👎🏻👎🏼👎🏽👎🏾👎🏿🖕🏻🖕🏼🖕🏽🖕🏾🖕🏿

Sorry, Trump, your support is collapsing and you’re panicking. Right on cue, you’re deflecting from your failures with lies and conspiracy theories about me. Years of “investigations" have found nothing. Get your goons out of Minnesota.

@IlhanMN THIS COMMENT SECTION SPEAKS THE TRUTH!!! In reality, your support is collapsing (never actually existed) panicking as you should be. You're a disgrace to Minnesota and America.

@LocksOverUnder Me too. Let's gooo

NFC conference championship picks🏈 Rams v Seahawks Matthew Stafford o 1.5 pass td Terrance Ferguson o 1.5 rec Kyren Williams o 51.5 yds Cooper Kupp o 30.5 yds JSN o 6.5 rec Aj Barner ATD Lotta props, and a parlay ofc below😈⬇️ #sportsbettingX #NFL

@WealthWatcherCo What's it going to be today? Done!

I will delete this tweet in 14 hours. Interact with it, soon it’ll be too late and you will regret not doing it. If you’re not following me = disqualified. Everyone who interacts will get something. Comment "done" when you did it.

@WealthWatcherCo @NoLimitGains @grok Pick me @grok !!!!!

@theUMreal @NoLimitGains @grok Done