Misper

8.7K posts

Misper banner
Misper

Misper

@misperaki

Hic sita est altera / cuius nomen in aqua scriptum erat

Oxford, England Katılım Mart 2013
228 Takip Edilen34.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Misper
Misper@misperaki·
ทุกคน ข้อยมีเรื่องจะประกาศ! อะแฮ่ม เรื่องมีอยู่ว่า วันนี้วันเกิดข้อยเอง! *โปรยข้าวตอกดอกไม้* หลังจากคิดมาตั้งแต่ปี 2021 ในที่สุดข้อยก็ตัดสินใจเอานิยายที่เขียนไว้มาเปิดเผย! 5555555 แด่เด็กหนุ่มผู้กลายเป็นดอกไม้ (และหมู่ดาว) กระซิบว่าเป็น modern retelling ของนิทานกรีกล่ะ!
Misper tweet media
Misper@misperaki

เพราะผมชอบคุณมาก มากเกินกว่าที่ผู้ชายสักคนจะพูดออกมา มันทำให้คุณรำคาญ และผมสัญญา จะเลิกคิดแบบนั้นกับคุณ เพื่อจะจากกันไปคนละฟากโลก ใช้โลกทั้งใบกั้นผมจากคุณ เราเอ่ยคำอำลา เย็นชา แห้งแล้ง 'ลาก่อน' คุณบอก 'ลืมผมเสีย' 'ผมจะลืมคุณ ไม่ต้องกลัว' ผมตอบ /1

ไทย
25
793
1.2K
151.5K
Misper retweetledi
Inviting History
Inviting History@invitinghistory·
A promotional photo for the Finnish National Opera Ballet's "The Little Mermaid."
Inviting History tweet media
English
21
3.9K
29.8K
415.9K
Misper retweetledi
Misper retweetledi
Iosif Lazaridis
Iosif Lazaridis@iosif_lazaridis·
I created two PDF Greek editions of the Iliad and the Odyssey for my personal use that might be useful for others. They are minimalist with space for notes, line/page numbers and a ToC. You can download them from: dropbox.com/scl/fo/g870hp7… Let me know if there are any issues.
Iosif Lazaridis tweet mediaIosif Lazaridis tweet media
English
20
84
537
27.8K
Misper retweetledi
Learn Latin
Learn Latin@latinedisce·
The final assignment by one of my students, composed entirely in Latin and presented in beautiful medieval-style calligraphy. It’s remarkable what can be achieved in just a few months with enthusiasm, dedication, and the right method of instruction. I’m a very proud magister!
Learn Latin tweet media
English
25
120
1.2K
20.1K
Misper retweetledi
Benji
Benji@WrnrWrites·
To confirm, this “100% AI generated” passage is the opening of chapter 5 from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
Benji tweet media
English
687
6.6K
96K
8.6M
Misper retweetledi
Prof. Frank McDonough
Prof. Frank McDonough@FXMC1957·
PHOTO OF THE DAY. A woman posting letter in London during the Blitz for a photo shoot for Vogue magazine (1940). 📷 Cecil Beaton
Prof. Frank McDonough tweet media
English
28
465
2.9K
52.1K
Misper retweetledi
Phil Hoyeck
Phil Hoyeck@PAHoyeck·
This is a really excellent quiz. It teaches the important lesson that, by carefully doctoring questions and offering a very limited range of answers, you can force people into whatever philosophical or ideological pigeonhole you like.
Phil Hoyeck tweet media
English
104
155
3.1K
169.3K
Misper retweetledi
Ounka
Ounka@OunkaOnX·
ZXX
23
2.2K
8.6K
106.5K
Misper retweetledi
Bark
Bark@barkmeta·
Let me get this straight… OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit. Open source. For everyone. “To benefit humanity.” Then he raised billions of dollars. Then he closed the source code. Then he converted to for-profit. Then he scraped the entire internet without asking anyone. Then he used YOUR writing YOUR art YOUR code to train his models. Now he’s on stage saying you’ll pay HIM to access intelligence. Just like a water meter. He stole all of your data. He built the product with your work. And now he’s going to bill you to use it… Corporate greed has reached an all time high, and they’re not even hiding it anymore…
Chief Nerd@TheChiefNerd

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.”

English
1.9K
31.1K
126.5K
3.7M
Misper retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone. And it's making you a worse person because of it. Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would. That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear. It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on. Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one. The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started. Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product. This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens. Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing. You're right. They're wrong. Even when the opposite is true.
Nav Toor tweet media
English
1.5K
16.5K
48.7K
9.9M
Misper retweetledi
L. David Fairchild
L. David Fairchild@David_Fairchild·
He's not just defending AI energy use. He is smuggling in a whole anthropology where humans are basically inefficient meat computers that you have to pour food and years into before they become useful. And once you accept that, the next move is obvious. If people are just costly biological training runs, then burning mountains of electricity to build synthetic intelligence starts to feel not only equal, but superior, even if it negatively impacts actual humans. That is the dystopian. It makes human development sound like a bug in the system, and it makes sacrificing human and creational flourishing for more computational power sound logical. To him, the grid gets strained, prices go up, ecosystems get hit, but hey, humans eat too, so what's the difference? The difference is that humans aren't an inefficient line item. They're the point. If your worldview can look at a child growing into an adult and describe it as energy spent to train intelligence, you haven't said something profound. You've revealed a horrifically rotten worldview.
Chief Nerd@TheChiefNerd

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “People talk about how much energy it takes to train an AI model … But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human. It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart.”

English
679
10.1K
43.3K
1.6M
Misper retweetledi
Semyon Bychkov
Semyon Bychkov@SemyonBychkov1·
Tchaikovsky's opera Eugene Onegin, directed by Ralph Fiennes and conducted by Semyon Bychkov, will be livestreamed on france.tv on Monday, February 9, at 7:30pm.
Semyon Bychkov tweet media
English
7
35
87
2.6K
Misper retweetledi
Semyon Bychkov
Semyon Bychkov@SemyonBychkov1·
"Bychkov is never one to be rushed in Tchaikovsky, but the tension never sagged for a moment. Indeed, as soon as the curtain came down, I could happily have watched the whole thing all over again." - Mark Pullinger reviews Eugene Onegin at the Paris Opera, for OperaNow.
Semyon Bychkov tweet media
English
3
17
81
2.1K
Misper retweetledi
Kyoko
Kyoko@KyokoLondon·
TURANDOT. Anna Pirozzi, Roberto Alagna, Juliana Grigoryan, Vitalij Kowaljow, conducted by Daniel Oren. #Turandot @roberto_alagna
Kyoko tweet mediaKyoko tweet media
Suomi
1
8
19
2.1K
Misper retweetledi
Jamie Bonkiewicz
Jamie Bonkiewicz@JamieBonkiewicz·
Only two people have ever accepted a second-hand Nobel Prize as a gift. One of them was Joseph Goebbels.
English
572
12.8K
94.2K
2.2M