wolves back 🐺

399 posts

wolves back 🐺 banner
wolves back 🐺

wolves back 🐺

@mnpykings

Katılım Mayıs 2020
520 Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
mrjohnsonpaints
mrjohnsonpaints@mrjohnsonpaints·
Thanks to everyone that reached out about the signs! I’m going to have more printed and they will always be priced at the cost of printing.
English
7
2
102
1.6K
wolves back 🐺 retweetledi
Pick6
Pick6@Pick6·
LIVE EVENT GIVEAWAY. 😈 Win a free trip to Dallas, TX to compete for $25k in our Live Event @CosmDallas! To enter: Follow @Pick6, RT, and comment “PICK6 LIVE”. Ends tomorrow at 12am. 🫡
Pick6 tweet media
English
415
370
317
142.9K
Pick6
Pick6@Pick6·
Let’s play a game for Week 18. 😈 Choose a football. 1 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 2 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 3 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 4 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 5 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 6 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 A B C D E F
English
501
17
130
23.4K
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@nbastats 9:01 4th quarter Amen tips it to Sengun but Sengun is credited with the rebound. Please fix!
English
0
0
0
134
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@nbastats very clearly and indisputably a Lavine assist here rather than Derozan. Please fix!
wolves back 🐺 tweet media
English
1
0
0
342
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@nbastats this is indisputably an oubre rebound and I don’t know how it could be graded otherwise
English
0
0
0
211
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@nbastats at 1:18 in the 4th off the Ball freethrow miss, oubre clearly and intentionally taps the rebound out to edgecombe. This is an oubre rebound but erroneously graded as an edgecombe rebound. The announcer even called it an oubre rebound live it was so clear. Please fix!
English
1
0
0
333
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@nbastats bridges clearly does not touch it and it is an intentional tap out by oubre. Please fix!
English
0
0
0
200
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@nbastats at 1:18 in the fourth oubre pretty clearly taps the rebound to edgecombe. This was erroneously graded as an edgecombe rebound and should be corrected
English
1
0
0
227
Dexerto
Dexerto@Dexerto·
Twitch streamer BobbyBigBallz confronted by airport security for “suspicious” behavior
English
130
236
7.4K
1.6M
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@AllanLemDFS If they start refunding or demoting entries that would cause more problems than it solves as prizes would no longer be guaranteed. Just have to be cautious of potential DNP situations. Nobody complaining in the replies understands how the platform works
English
0
0
0
66
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@AllanLemDFS Unfortunately there’s not really a way to combat this. You are entering contests exclusively consisting of the amount of picks you submit. They can’t demote your entry to one pick lower and can’t refund outright because your picks are entered into contests with guaranteed prizes
English
1
0
0
341
Allan Lem
Allan Lem@AllanLemDFS·
I’m enjoying the DraftKings Pick6 product so far but the DNP’s counting as a loss really hurts.
Allan Lem tweet media
English
17
0
29
20.3K
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@JustinHerzig Do you think a 3 week playoff with all advancing teams in one pod could combat the roster similarity issue of just one large pod for 3 different weeks? Also, I would love contests that forego playoff variance entirely and just have only regular season leaderboard payouts
English
0
0
0
103
Justin Herzig
Justin Herzig@JustinHerzig·
Each year best ball drafters call for a change to top x% advancing instead of random pods The problem is the finals would be comprised of teams that look nearly identical My lean for all rounds is same format but include 10% of the next round being comprised of wild card spots
English
35
1
142
67.5K
wolves back 🐺
wolves back 🐺@mnpykings·
@JustinMacmahan Sweet advance rate, really shows how sharp your rankings were. Would you be comfortable auto’ing playoff bestball as well if you liked your rankings enough? Or do you think that it’s a different game and the lose-and-out nature of the format requires 100% manual intervention?
English
1
0
0
830
Justin Macmahan
Justin Macmahan@JustinMacmahan·
Autodrafting my teams led to a dominant advance rate and saved me dozens of hours I would’ve spent drafting. Will it lead me to advancement through the playoff rounds though? Stay tuned to find out 👀
Justin Macmahan tweet media
English
17
0
48
26.9K
wolves back 🐺 retweetledi
Dan Back
Dan Back@dan_back·
This is the way. I’ve heard @adamlevitan articulate this as well. If you can’t take $200 on a prop then why book bets. It definitely won’t break the books bottom line & it’s just enough to be worth grinding the edges (for some). The limiting of bettors to $6 a bet has got to go.
Andy Means@ameansy

@ScoresOdds Want to have house limits? Of course that should be a thing. But they should be applied uniformly to every customer. The fact that books get to pick-and-choose who gets to place certain bets is utterly ridiculous. I hope this eventually gets addressed by regulators.

English
2
3
16
18.8K
Zak L
Zak L@zak4477·
@SamHoppen Maybe I’m the contrarian, but isn’t 2 QBs facing off in week 17 not what you want? So you’re guaranteeing one of your top 5 picks won’t have his score counted in week 17… I think you pick one but that’s just my opinion/strategy.
English
2
0
2
137
Sam Hoppen
Sam Hoppen@SamHoppen·
If this team somehow makes it to Week 17, we will be ✨thriving✨
Sam Hoppen tweet media
English
3
0
1
3.2K
wolves back 🐺 retweetledi
Robby
Robby@greerreNFL·
But I really don't know what make of RYOE, which is super unstable year to year (min 50 attempts) To me this says the model's error term has a lot more in it than can be explained by the RB, so we shouldn't say RYOE is a RB stat unless we've got a big af sample
Robby tweet media
English
7
3
36
0