wolves back 🐺

@mrjohnsonpaints Could you shoot me a follow so I can message? Thanks!

Thanks to everyone that reached out about the signs! I’m going to have more printed and they will always be priced at the cost of printing.

@Pick6 @CosmDallas PICK6 LIVE

LIVE EVENT GIVEAWAY. 😈 Win a free trip to Dallas, TX to compete for $25k in our Live Event @CosmDallas! To enter: Follow @Pick6, RT, and comment “PICK6 LIVE”. Ends tomorrow at 12am. 🫡

@Pick6 4C

Let’s play a game for Week 18. 😈 Choose a football. 1 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 2 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 3 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 4 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 5 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 6 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 A B C D E F

@nbastats 9:01 4th quarter Amen tips it to Sengun but Sengun is credited with the rebound. Please fix!

@nbastats @NBAStatsAudit even in 240p it’s so obvious that’s a Lavine ast lol

@nbastats very clearly and indisputably a Lavine assist here rather than Derozan. Please fix!

@nbastats this is indisputably an oubre rebound and I don’t know how it could be graded otherwise

@nbastats at 1:18 in the 4th off the Ball freethrow miss, oubre clearly and intentionally taps the rebound out to edgecombe. This is an oubre rebound but erroneously graded as an edgecombe rebound. The announcer even called it an oubre rebound live it was so clear. Please fix!

@nbastats bridges clearly does not touch it and it is an intentional tap out by oubre. Please fix!

@nbastats at 1:18 in the fourth oubre pretty clearly taps the rebound to edgecombe. This was erroneously graded as an edgecombe rebound and should be corrected

@Dexerto “I’m not normal I play falco” @kyletweetshere

Twitch streamer BobbyBigBallz confronted by airport security for “suspicious” behavior

@AllanLemDFS If they start refunding or demoting entries that would cause more problems than it solves as prizes would no longer be guaranteed. Just have to be cautious of potential DNP situations. Nobody complaining in the replies understands how the platform works

@AllanLemDFS Unfortunately there’s not really a way to combat this. You are entering contests exclusively consisting of the amount of picks you submit. They can’t demote your entry to one pick lower and can’t refund outright because your picks are entered into contests with guaranteed prizes

I’m enjoying the DraftKings Pick6 product so far but the DNP’s counting as a loss really hurts.

@JustinHerzig Do you think a 3 week playoff with all advancing teams in one pod could combat the roster similarity issue of just one large pod for 3 different weeks? Also, I would love contests that forego playoff variance entirely and just have only regular season leaderboard payouts

Each year best ball drafters call for a change to top x% advancing instead of random pods The problem is the finals would be comprised of teams that look nearly identical My lean for all rounds is same format but include 10% of the next round being comprised of wild card spots

@JustinMacmahan Sweet advance rate, really shows how sharp your rankings were. Would you be comfortable auto’ing playoff bestball as well if you liked your rankings enough? Or do you think that it’s a different game and the lose-and-out nature of the format requires 100% manual intervention?

Autodrafting my teams led to a dominant advance rate and saved me dozens of hours I would’ve spent drafting. Will it lead me to advancement through the playoff rounds though? Stay tuned to find out 👀

This is the way. I’ve heard @adamlevitan articulate this as well. If you can’t take $200 on a prop then why book bets. It definitely won’t break the books bottom line & it’s just enough to be worth grinding the edges (for some). The limiting of bettors to $6 a bet has got to go.

@zak4477 @SamHoppen Yeah @JustinHerzig had a good discussion on this twitter.com/justinherzig/s…

@SamHoppen Maybe I’m the contrarian, but isn’t 2 QBs facing off in week 17 not what you want? So you’re guaranteeing one of your top 5 picks won’t have his score counted in week 17… I think you pick one but that’s just my opinion/strategy.

If this team somehow makes it to Week 17, we will be ✨thriving✨

But I really don't know what make of RYOE, which is super unstable year to year (min 50 attempts) To me this says the model's error term has a lot more in it than can be explained by the RB, so we shouldn't say RYOE is a RB stat unless we've got a big af sample