Moby Richard Unplugged

@BarryESharp Post isn’t long enough Bazzer.. 😉

@MobyUnplugged Misleading by omission

You can’t as you are banned from being around kids.

Mr Cartland,You were a practising GP and will have seen vast amount of RSV in practice,you know how severe the illness can be in babies, especially if premature and babies with comorbidities Now you are actively encouraging parents NOT vaccinating their infants. 😡 shame on you

@SPhinbow @ZaphodBeebleJnr

It appears we have a new Mutton Crew deputy leader @SPhinbow @MobyUnplugged were you aware you had been desposed?

This 2020 article focused on early trial designs. Real-world data quickly confirmed vaccines significantly reduced severe COVID-19, hospitalizations, and deaths, saving millions globally. 2020 Dave. 🤡

Preprints, such as those on Europe PMC, are not peer-reviewed and do not prove causation. Reported cases often involve pre-existing conditions, with major agencies finding no link between vaccines and cancer. Soz Dave. Perhaps you should ‘do some research’? 😉

This study does not prove causality between vaccines and reported syndromes, as large-scale evidence confirms vaccines significantly reduce Long COVID risk. Soz Dave.

@bbbennybennyben @WhatLisabetDoes @CartlandDavid

@WhatLisabetDoes @MobyUnplugged @CartlandDavid I did think about photoshopping his face onto the seal, but then remembered that he'd complain to the police that I'm encouraging vicious attacks on him by slightly vexed domestic cats.

@CartlandDavid Remember this Dave?

@BarryESharp @DrNeilStone Scientific consensus confirms vaccines saved ~20M lives by 2022. SV40/DNA claims are debunked: levels are safe, non-functional, and don't alter DNA. Risks like myocarditis are rare and outweighed. Otherwise spot on Bazza. 😂

You accuse me of cherry-picking while citing the same 2022-era modeling papers that assumed zero pre-existing immunity, ignored natural/hybrid immunity (already widespread by late 2020 per wastewater and serology data), treated “with COVID” hospital deaths as “from COVID,” ran high-cycle PCR thresholds, and baked in healthy-user bias. Those models are obsolete. John Ioannidis’ 2025 JAMA Health Forum analysis, the most comprehensive empirical update available, puts global mRNA-attributable lives saved at roughly 2.5 million across 2020-2024. That works out to one life saved per 5,400 doses administered. Ninety percent of any benefit accrued to people over 60. The credible range across sensitivity analyses is 1.4–4 million. Not the “millions upon millions” miracle you keep repeating. For everyone else, especially younger cohorts with near-zero COVID risk, the risk-benefit flips negative fast. You wave away “alleged” DNA contamination. Speicher et al. 2025 (peer-reviewed, Autoimmunity) measured residual plasmid DNA in Ontario-sourced Pfizer vials at 36–153 times the FDA and WHO regulatory limits by fluorometry. The SV40 promoter-enhancer sequence was present exclusively in Pfizer product, packaged inside the lipid nanoparticles. That is not theory; it is direct quantification from vials administered to Canadians. Regulatory agencies still have no answer for genomic integration risk, oncogenicity, or insertional mutagenesis. Myocarditis? Ontario public data: 299 cases per million males aged 18–24 after the second Moderna dose. That is not “rare,” it is documented, age-stratified, and product-specific. Canada recorded approximately 31,000 excess deaths in 2022, the exact window of the adult booster campaign, while COVID deaths had already collapsed. You cannot hand-wave the timing. We still have no raw, stratified all-cause mortality data by vaccination status, age, and comorbidity released by PHAC or Health Canada. That absence is the scandal. Every major claim of net benefit rests on models that refuse to show the unadjusted tables. Meanwhile, signals of IgG4 class switching, persistent circulating spike, ribosomal frameshifting, accelerated cancers, and fertility declines continue to appear in independent datasets and are met with silence or dismissal. This is the same regulatory capture and narrative enforcement that shielded the manufacturers under the PREP Act, suppressed early treatment protocols, and coerced millions into an experimental platform with zero long-term safety data at the time of rollout. Bodily autonomy and informed consent were treated as optional. The same technocratic mindset now runs Ottawa: Mark Carney’s minority-turned-majority government, $2.35 trillion federal debt, net-zero ideology that has stalled over $670 billion in resource and energy projects, Bill C-69, DRIPA race-based vetoes, and one law for some but not all. While Canadians get hammered by inflation and cost-of-living spikes, the Strait of Hormuz crisis is driving global energy prices higher and exposing exactly how vulnerable Carney’s anti-development dogma has left us. You want to defend the product? Show the raw data. Until then, stop gaslighting the public with cherry-picked modeling and “trust the experts” slogans that have already failed on every measurable metric. Evidence over excuses. Precision over propaganda. Citizens first. Canada first. One law for all.

Tens of millions of unvaccinated people died from Covid but hey, enjoy your fake certificate

Your own submission below said you completed a certificate Dave. Not a letter. So, were you lying then, or are you lying now? Or you are so pissed up, you can’t remember. PS. Go easy on the threats. The @DBSgovuk and @FA aren’t keen on them & it won’t help your appeals. 😉

You admitted to writing them Dave.

Thanks for bravely replying from behind your block Dave. But don’t forget, you have already identified me - 9x so far. 😉 Aaron, a DJ from Basingstoke being the latest. Incidentally, you have screwed up today in a way you haven’t yet realised. You’ve earn’t a tick tock ⏰

@KernowKevin @JWendleken91807 @CartlandDavid

@JWendleken91807 @CartlandDavid He most definitely is that insane. A Messiah complex at the very least.

Peak delusion from Dishonest Disgraced Dave. @CartlandDavid `Arise, Lord Lie-A-Lot of St Buryan'

@BarryESharp @DrNeilStone Your argument relies on cherry-picked data Bazza. Major studies confirm mRNA vaccines significantly reduced global deaths. Alleged "DNA contamination" and myocarditis risks are well-monitored and far outweighed by COVID-19's dangers.

Your reply once again sidesteps the complete set of confounders that render any modeling of these mRNA products’ net benefit unreliable. The 2025 Ioannidis JAMA Health Forum analysis estimates roughly 2.5 million deaths averted globally from 2020–2024 (range 1.4-4 million), with 90 % of that benefit in people aged 60 and older and one death averted per 5,400 doses administered. Even that more modest figure rests on assumptions that do not incorporate the full list of documented confounders. Those confounders include: widespread prior and hybrid immunity from SARS-CoV-2 circulation well before the official 2020 timeline (confirmed by wastewater surveillance in Italy and Brazil); immune-escape variants such as E484K already present in circulation before mass rollout; inflated case counts driven by high-cycle-threshold PCR testing; systematic misattribution of deaths recorded as “with COVID” rather than from COVID; healthy-user bias in the vaccinated cohorts; policy failures in long-term care facilities that drove the majority of early deaths; and massive data gaps in low- and middle-income countries, particularly China and India, which the study itself flags as sources of high uncertainty. Canada’s own data illustrate the problem. The roughly 31,000 excess deaths recorded in 2022 coincided exactly with the national booster campaign. Ontario reported myocarditis rates of 299 cases per million in young males following Moderna. None of these signals are reconciled in the modeling you cite. We still lack any transparent, raw, stratified all-cause mortality data broken down by vaccination status, age, comorbidities, and prior-infection status at the global level. Passive pharmacovigilance systems under-report harms by factors of 10–100× according to the Harvard Pilgrim study. Regulatory capture, PREP Act liability shields, and the suppression of early-treatment data compound the opacity. Compounding all of that is the absence of any established mechanism of harm. We do not know the full downstream effects of N1-methylpseudouridine-modified mRNA, systemic lipid-nanoparticle biodistribution, persistent spike protein, IgG4 class switching, ribosomal frameshifting, or the plasmid DNA contamination documented in the peer-reviewed Speicher et al. 2025 analysis (residual DNA 36–153× above regulatory limits by fluorometry, including the SV40 promoter sequence in Pfizer vials). Until governments release the raw data for independent analysis, no one can produce a credible global tally of vaccine-related deaths and injuries, nor can anyone claim a definitive net benefit. Precision requires the unadjusted numbers, not further modeling layered on top of the same incomplete inputs. Evidence over excuses. Precision over propaganda. Citizens first. Canada first. One law for all.

@WhatLisabetDoes His patio will be dug up eventually

‘Mini Me’s’. Even his description of the remaining kids that speak to him is narcissistic. And i’m not sure his current family would be comfortable with Dave picking up a bat when they are around…

@BarryESharp @DrNeilStone Ioannidis (2025) found >2.5M lives saved, with 90% of benefits in the over-60 group, confirming high efficacy for the vulnerable. Peer-reviewed studies have debunked concerns regarding DNA contamination.

Post 1. Your defence of the mRNA shots using the 2025 Ioannidis JAMA Health Forum analysis misses the fundamental problems with inferring any reliable net benefit. That peer-reviewed study puts the global total at roughly 2.5 million deaths averted from 2020–2024 (range 1.4–4.0 million), or one death averted per 5,400 doses administered. Ninety percent of any benefit was confined to people aged 60 and older; 82 percent to those vaccinated before prior infection. Children and young adults contributed a vanishingly small fraction. Those numbers already reflect real-world empirical data on infection fatality rates, vaccination coverage, and variant timing , not the inflated 2022 modeling exercises you still lean on. But even that modest, age-stratified figure rests on extraordinarily shaky ground once you examine the data gaps and biological uncertainties we still face in 2026. Systemic pharmacovigilance systems are passive by design and severely under-report harms. VAERS, Yellow Card, Canada’s system, and their international equivalents capture only a fraction of events; the Harvard Pilgrim study and others have long documented under-reporting factors of 10–100× for serious adverse events. Active surveillance remains limited, short-term, and often unavailable. We still lack transparent, stratified all-cause mortality data by vaccination status, age, comorbidity, and prior infection on anything approaching a global scale. Without those raw, unadjusted datasets, any claim of net lives saved is speculative modeling, not causal proof. The mechanisms of harm from these synthetic mRNA products remain undefined in critical respects. The deliberate substitution of N1-methylpseudouridine strengthens and prolongs mRNA stability far beyond natural RNA, turning transfected cells into sustained spike-protein factories with no reliable “off switch.” Lipid nanoparticles biodistribute systemically to organs, gonads, brain, and heart , a fact established in the manufacturers’ own nonclinical studies and later confirmed independently. Residual plasmid DNA contamination, including the SV40 promoter-enhancer sequence, has been quantified in Ontario-sourced Pfizer vials at 36–153 times regulatory limits (Speicher et al. 2025, peer-reviewed in Autoimmunity). These are not theoretical risks; they are measured manufacturing byproducts encapsulated in LNPs capable of nuclear delivery. IgG4 class switching, persistent circulating spike protein, frameshifting, and signals of turbo cancers and fertility disruption appear on the same post-rollout timeline across multiple jurisdictions. Regulators have never required , and manufacturers have never delivered , the long-term genotoxicity, integration, or tumorigenicity studies specific to this modified platform in broad human populations. Global data gaps compound the problem. Low- and middle-income countries still lack consistent testing, sequencing, mortality tracking, and pharmacovigilance infrastructure. The Ioannidis estimates themselves note major uncertainty in China and India alone. Any extrapolation to the entire planet therefore rests on incomplete, high-income-country-heavy inputs. We still do not know where or when COVID-19 originated. Wastewater surveillance documented SARS-CoV-2 circulation in northern Italy and Brazil by late 2019 , months before the official Wuhan timeline. The exact spillover event, patient zero, or precise starting point remains unresolved despite years of investigation. That single foundational uncertainty already undermines every modeling assumption about baseline mortality “without vaccines.”

@slim2buff He did. Accused others of bestiality

@MobyUnplugged Didn't he do something that was referenced in his MPTS along this line?

You love focusing on bestiality almost as much as you do on paedophilia. It also cropped up in your tribunal. Hope your dogs are safe with you in the house…

@BarryESharp @DrNeilStone The 2025 Ioannidis study actually confirms >2.5M lives saved (1.4–4M range), demonstrating major benefits despite a lower estimate than 2022. While specific risks exist, the net benefit is clear.

While you claim the 2025 Ioannidis JAMA Health Forum study confirms reduced mortality from the COVID vaccines, I have repeatedly highlighted in my threads that even this peer-reviewed empirical analysis estimates only 2.5 million global deaths averted across 2020-2024 (range 1.4–4 million), or one death averted per 5,400 doses administered, with 90 percent of benefits concentrated in those over age 60 and 82 percent from vaccinations administered before infection. This is a far cry from the inflated 2022 modeling figures like Watson’s approximately 19.8–20 million. More critically, as I have demanded for years, we have no transparent, stratified all-cause mortality data by vaccination status, age, comorbidity, and prior infection on a global scale. Pharmacovigilance systems are passive and underreport harms severely; active surveillance is limited, short-term, and often unavailable. Independent analyses like Speicher et al. 2025 document plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter contamination in Pfizer vials at 36–153 times regulatory limits. Signals of myocarditis, such as Ontario’s rate of 299 cases per million young males after Moderna, IgG4 class switching, persistent spike protein, rising turbo-cancers, and fertility disruptions remain unquantified in terms of total global harms. Without knowing how many people were killed or seriously injured by these products, data hidden behind regulatory capture, liability shields like PREP, and refusal to release raw datasets, any claim of net reduced mortality is inherently subjective and speculative at best. Canada’s roughly 31,000 excess deaths in 2022 aligned precisely with the booster campaigns, not with unvaccinated cohorts. I continue to demand the release of raw, stratified data instead of narrative defense. Evidence over excuses. Precision over propaganda. Citizens first. Canada first. One law for all.