clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞

30.8K posts

clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞 banner
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞

clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞

@moepuff

she/they. 30+ Aged Bisexual. AuDHD. Genshin Impact, FF14 & Pokemon. Minors DNI 🔞. 🌱🏛️ 🔁🆗 https://t.co/PZ9Tr0o5N3

Katılım Temmuz 2014
490 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞
Hi-Ho, Clover D. Puff Here! 30+ Enby, Disabled, Very Tired. 🏳️‍🌈From the White People Factory. Switch Ships in All Things. 🔞Minors DNI, it's not safe for you here. Genshin, FFXIV, Pokemon. moepuff.carrd.co
English
2
0
20
32.9K
tin
tin@tinartss·
@moepuff !!!!! 😭😭😭 literally
English
1
0
1
29
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞 retweetledi
tin
tin@tinartss·
(6.6 spoilers) pure and simple #haikaveh #kavetham
tin tweet media
English
9
2K
13.1K
85.3K
noran 🍂
noran 🍂@noranb_·
@moepuff i’m torn between looking up all the cutscenes and playing it myself but just the little i’ve seen is crazyyyy
English
1
0
3
110
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞 retweetledi
bana 🍌 @DOKOMI 3R37
🌱🏛️ the two sides of the mirror
bana 🍌 @DOKOMI 3R37 tweet media
English
5
218
944
5K
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞 retweetledi
RC Ruler
RC Ruler@Xenosaiyan·
To ALL Honkai Star Rail fans Gilgamesh is a misogynistic king who got defeated in a misogyny competition by a cannibalistic lesbian He has a non-binary lover & swings every way He will out woke you He will out conservative you He is undefeatable He has never won a single fight
RC Ruler tweet media
English
301
5.9K
46K
884.2K
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞 retweetledi
zan 💥
zan 💥@zanzimez·
there’s this fic discourse happening rn about how terrible the ‘popular’ fics in fandom are, and they’re talking about these authors like they’re rich nepo baby industry plants and not just other normal people writing fanfiction for fun and it’s making me crazy
English
36
2.2K
19.1K
339K
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞
hey can we do me a big favor and not refer to people being delusional on main as schizo behavior I didn't need to see wild ableism on my tl at 9 in the morning thanks.
English
1
0
3
107
neyla 🏳️‍🌈
neyla 🏳️‍🌈@alciedoodles·
"adjustments" (or 'notfakedating' as was the name of the file), an unfinished #haikaveh comic i abandoned 2 years ago, in 3 parts. please enjoy! part 1 - 1/3
neyla 🏳️‍🌈 tweet medianeyla 🏳️‍🌈 tweet medianeyla 🏳️‍🌈 tweet media
English
90
1.6K
8K
241.5K
clover d. puff | 🌱🏛️🌱| 🔞 retweetledi
Priya Satia
Priya Satia@PriyaSatia·
“The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you…”
Ryan Hart@thisdudelikesAI

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

English
33
12.9K
66.9K
1.8M