Eric E
11.9K posts
How many people are still in the room🤔🤔👀👀
Solve honestly in 5 seconds..!!!!!!
English
中国人逻辑是：
“我又没影响别人，我就是对的。”
“日本人也在店门口拍照跳舞，你们怎么不骂？”
“我有流量，我是在给你们做宣传。”
日本人逻辑是：
“你在店铺门口制造存在感，本身就已经影响别人了。”
“把未申请的公共空间当舞台的都是傻逼。”
“我们不需要迷惑宣传，我们只想平静生活。”
本质上这个事情就是中国人逻辑和日本人逻辑的一个碰撞，在日本时间长的中国人，也会慢慢变成日本人的思维。
但是中国做网红培训的重要一课就是不要脸，作为一个没智商，没资源，没人脉，没官方捧你的草根网红。只有不要脸，只有能豁得出去，只有能放下一切，你才能有流量。
所以很多人会放下一切身段在各种公开场合展示自己，因为只有这样他们才会被人看到。但也有更多的人对于这种公开的展示并不买账，因为他们自己做不到，同时又担心当越来越多的人这样做了的话，自己又该怎么办。
中文
@dw_chinese 对于中国来说，统一不复杂：
内政台湾人自己管，选举照常，只是选的不再是“总统”，而是行政长官，中央政府不介入。
台湾现行的制度基本保持不变。哪些需要调整、如何调整以适合统一后的国情，可以谈。
外交、国安、国防均由中央政府负责，这三者不属于地方事务，但肯定会吸纳大量的台湾人参与其中。
中文
台湾主张台独的政党喜乐岛联盟近日在其官网发布一封致中共总书记习近平的公开信，表示愿意在特定条件下调整台独立场，考虑成为中华人民共和国的一部分——但前提是“台人治台、高度自治”必须获得明确且具约束力的承诺与支持。
喜乐岛联盟政党由台湾基督长老教会议长罗仁贵与民视公司董事长郭倍宏等人在2019年7月创立。该政党主张台湾独立，提出“独立公投，正名入联”目标，且希望透过公民投票的方式，让台湾成为国际社会上的正常化民主国家。
这封公开信由喜乐岛联盟主席萧晓玲署名，以中英文版本同步刊出。
公开信中指出，“中国对台澎主权的主张，主要来自开罗会议与波茨坦公告，盟军当时承诺战后将台湾澎湖归还中国。日本降伏文书中，日方同意履行该内容。这确实构成中国的历史依据”。
但公开信也强调，“最终确立台澎主权的《旧金山和约》并未将主权让渡给中国，两个中国政府也均未签字。其后的《中日（台北）和约》及《美中三公报》，同样未明确让渡台澎主权，美方仅认知中国（北京）对台澎的领土主张。因此，台澎主权至今仍是真空状态——中国从未完整取得”。
公开信要求，在考虑成为中华人民共和国一部分之前，中共须“修正现行政策，直接向美国摊牌并声讨台澎主权归属”；“停止与中华民国政府及其体制内主要政党的一切对话，转而直接与台湾人民对话”；“由于贵党（中共）过去多次背信弃义，我们要求对台事务不再由贵党主导，而是委由台湾民主自治同盟与吾等台湾人民进行商谈”。
加拿大约克大学副教授沈荣钦对此表示，“喜乐岛要利用中共排除台湾的民选政府，由毫无选票的他们成为台湾代表之一，与对方讨论台湾如何‘成为中华人民共和国的一部分’，蔑视民主到了匪夷所思的地步”。
由于被质疑台独立场发生转变，喜乐岛联盟在公开信下方更新强调，公开信“旨在嘲讽中共、细数其过河拆桥之黑历史，并同时暗示要美国负起主要占领国之责任与义务，终结中华民国代管体制”。该党表示，“不欢迎任何不明事理或刻意扭曲喜乐岛联盟立场之言论”。
中文
@KhedroobT Pick up your weapons, take back Tibet! Have faith in yourselves, you've got this!
English
China is an atheist country. The CCP has no religion. So China has no right to choose the next Dalai Lama. It should free Tibet and the Tibetan people. Very simple we are not Chinese nor were we ever part of China. For 67 years you have misruled Tibet.The Tibetan people want out
English
@Wisdom_HQ Pregnancy only requires the man's sperm to show up, not the man himself.
English
無論是美國第51州論，還是中國政權的一國兩制台灣方案，我都堅決反對台灣成為他國領土，這正是台獨的基本原則
我只主張建立一個新而獨立的台灣國家🇳🇫🪷
中文
@TaiwanSpecial Without the Taiwan Strait, I don't think the U.S. 7th Fleet would be of much use to Taiwan.
English
Taiwan vs China:
What if, just spitballing here …
We set aside reality and contemplate the amazing idea of filling in the Taiwan Strait to create a new island that Taiwan owns?
We hire Chinese land reclamation experts to reclaim anything that is less than 60 meters deep (the deepest depth currently being reclaimed)
After-all, Chinese have all that experience they’ve gained filling in the South China Sea
The new landmass, lets call it Taistrait Island for now, would elevate Taiwan into a major country status:
Landmass: 100,000 square kilometers
- Estimated landfill: ~65,000 km²
- Current Taiwan: ~36,000 km²
Taiwan would become approximately the same size as South Korea (~100,000 km²)
Population: 65 million
- Landfill population capacity: ~42 million
- Existing Taiwan population: ~23.5 million
That would give Taiwan a population equivalent to France and the United Kingdom
GDP: US$2.76 Trillion
- Landfill GDP ~ USD1.8 Trillion
- Current Taiwan nominal GDP ~ USD977 Billion
That would put it roughly in the range of France, the United Kingdom and India
Nobody would be pushing it around then!
#Taiwan #China #TaiwanStrait #reclamation #alternatives #geography
English
@realgerhardtvdm Anyone is perfectly free to refuse to accept this unavoidable reality.
English
MY HUMBLE QUESTION TO THE WORLD:
Did you already accept that China is now the leading superpower of the world?
English
I personally will not teach my kids Chinese-here is why.
Most people think language is neutral. It isn’t.
Language is not just a communication tool. It’s a gateway into an entire information ecosystem, including its social media algorithms, societal narratives, cultural assumptions, social pressures, and political conditioning.
That’s why I’ve decided not to push my kids toward learning Chinese, especially Simplified Chinese.
When a child becomes fluent in Simplified Chinese, they are not simply learning vocabulary. They are entering an internet universe overwhelmingly shaped by CCP censorship, propaganda, and algorithmic control.
Even if global information remains technically accessible, algorithms matter. Volume matters. Repetition matters. Over time, what dominates the screen often dominates perception.
And here’s the uncomfortable contradiction I see among many first-generation Chinese immigrants:
They left China because they disliked the political system, social environment, lack of freedom, or suffocating pressure. Yet many then spend enormous effort sending their children right back into the same ideological ecosystem through language and media consumption.
You removed the body from China, but you send the mind back every day. This becomes even more powerful in diaspora communities, where Chinese education is often intertwined with identity education, constantly reinforcing the message that “your roots are China,” “you are Chinese first,” and that emotional loyalty should remain tied to a country the child may never have actually lived in.
Combined with modern identity politics in the West and Beijing’s extensive overseas influence operations and info warfare, this can gradually weaken a child’s identification with the country they actually call home.
Parents should think carefully not only about what language their children learn, but also what worldview comes attached to that language in today’s geopolitical environment. Because in the age of algorithms, language is no longer just language. It’s infrastructure for thought.
Moreover, learning Chinese requires massive time and energy. Any skill you learn has opportunity costs. Time spent on one thing can’t be spent on another. You have to judge: Is the return higher from improving English skills or from learning AI-related skills, investment skills, tennis skills, etc.? And even among languages, is Chinese the highest return?
From a purely utilitarian perspective, learning a second or third language is often not a high-return choice anymore.
Of course, this post will be incomplete without pointing out how foolhardy it is to think you can make money by learning Chinese from a country that plagued by weak domestic consumption and even native Chinese are growing poor in a crashing economy.
English