Monotanus

Narrative spins. Cash flow wins.

@DennisHarwich @ryancohen They called it Chewy for a reason.

@DennisHarwich @ryancohen He used to have the balls to build a business 😂

$GME $BBBYQ @ryancohen , it's become clear that you're a giant pussy lacking the guts needed to be CEO of any publicly traded company. I'm hereby offering you my courage. For no comp, I'll advise you on how NOT to breach your fiduc duty with your cowardice. My DMs are open.

@chemicultured Yeah I’ll take a look again 🍿

I THINK I FIG IT OUT 👀 TLDR DK-Butterfly's shell is alive and well. Step 1: Start with what we can see Source: openfigi.com/search?searchT… When you type BBG001S720V4 into OpenFIGI, you’ll see it labeled as a share class for “Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. — Common Stock.” That tells us one simple but powerful thing: this code is the permanent ID that represents the old Bed Bath & Beyond’s regular shares in global financial databases. Think of it as the social security number for that stock. It is unchanged even if the name, ticker, or exchange shifts. Historical Sources: sec.gov/Archives/edgar… Step 2: Notice what else is connected OpenFIGI links this share class to other identifiers: Its CUSIP root, 075896, which points to the original Bed Bath & Beyond issuer. Its ISIN, which wraps that CUSIP in an international format. Here is a picture displaying warrant information on Fidelity demonstrating just that too. And finally, its LEI, which identifies the legal entity (the company itself). Bottom of the same page Side note: @LJenkins69420 Remember when Pulte was hyping potentially big news all throughout October of 2024 and then the big news we ended up getting was a couple of picture of him with RC??? WELL I NEVER FORGOT LOL. I bet this was the actual big news. WHY? Because when the LEI 529900ZBUWWUV7BKGX39 was reactivated for DK-Butterfly on October 27, 2024, it signaled that the Bed Bath & Beyond corporate shell had been formally brought back into the global legal-entity system, confirming the entity’s survival and enabling it to legally hold assets, preserve its identifiers and NOLs. It had been sitting in a dormant state until this moment in time. Source: lei.bloomberg.com/leis/view/5299… Together, these identifiers form a fingerprint that computers everywhere use to recognize “this is the same stock,” even when ownership or branding changes. Step 3: Bring in the OCC memo Source (second one down): infomemo.theocc.com/infomemo/search Now look at the OCC Information Memo dated October 13, 2025. It describes a change: Bed Bath & Beyond distributed warrants—rights to buy stock at $15.50—to its shareholders. To make this work, the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) adjusted all the existing options contracts. They created a new symbol, BBBY1, whose deliverable now equals: 100 shares of Bed Bath & Beyond common stock (CUSIP 690370101), and 10 warrants (CUSIP 075896159). They even wrote the pricing formula right in the memo: BBBY1 = BBBY + 0.1 (BBBY WS) This means every option contract now treats the new shares and the old-root warrants as a single economic package. Step 4: See how the pieces lock together Here’s where the link becomes clear. The new Bed Bath & Beyond (formerly Overstock / Beyond Inc.) trades under CUSIP 690370, its own legal root. NOW LISTEN THE WARRANTS USE THE OLD BED BATH & BEOND ROOT, 075896. (THIS IS WHERE A LOT OF PEOPLE'S BRAINS GLITCH OUT DUE TO MANIPULATION, GASLIGHTING, AND MISDIRECTION, MOSTLY BROUGHT TO YOU BUY SHILLS) AGAIN IT SAYS 075896 IN BOTH OCC MEMOS (OCTOBER 1ST and OCTOBER 13TH). IT IS NOT A MISTAKE JFC. YOU CAN'T CHANGE THE FINE PRINT. DON'T LET ANYONE TELL YOU OTHERWISE. TELL THEM "YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO READ". Anyways, the OCC memo literally ties them together in one settlement bundle. So, now when a clearing house settles a BBBY1 option, it has to deliver both parts, the new shares AND the legacy-root warrants. That’s like a bridge joining the old corporate identity (through 075896) and the new one (through 690370) at the infrastructure level of the market. Step 5: Understand why BBG001S720V4 matters Because BBG001S720V4 IS THE LASTING SHARE-CLASS IDENTIFIER FOR THE OLD BED BATH & BEYOND COMMON STOCK, it’s the entry point that links all these systems. 🦋 When you follow that FIGI, it takes you from: The legacy Bed Bath & Beyond shares (before bankruptcy) To the CUSIP 075896 family (still used for the new warrants) To the OCC’s adjusted contracts that now merge the new and old identifiers in one deliverable. In other words, this one little FIGI is the breadcrumb that lets data systems and us trace continuity between the defunct company’s stock and the rebranded company’s equity recognized by clearing houses today. Step 6: The takeaway So, in plain terms: BBG001S720V4 tells us what the original stock was. The OCC memo shows that today’s trading infrastructure still connects new shares to that old root. Together, they prove that the market’s plumbing treats old Bed Bath & Beyond and the new Bed Bath & Beyond as two sides of the same ongoing thread. It’s not just a coincidence of name. It’s a data-level bridge encoded in identifiers and reinforced by the clearing system itself. Step 7: What this connection means when we zoom out Now that we’ve traced how identifiers and the OCC memo tie old Bed Bath & Beyond to the new one, we can understand why that continuity is important. Preservation of derivative history: Because the FIGI and the OCC adjustment keep the old identifiers alive in the market’s plumbing, every historical option, warrant, or swap referencing “BBBY” can still be priced, archived, and reconciled correctly. The clearing system doesn’t lose its link to prior contracts; it simply remaps them through the adjusted deliverable. That ensures that long-dated derivatives, risk models, and audit trails remain intact instead of orphaned by bankruptcy paperwork. Preservation of tax attributes such as NOLs: The same continuity that helps the OCC also helps accountants. The shell entity that legally owned the 075896 root—the “old” BBBY—still exists in state and federal registries. If its corporate records and tax filings remain compliant, its net operating losses (NOLs) can survive inside that shell. Under U.S. tax law, those NOLs can sometimes be carried forward or combined with a successor’s income if a proper reorganization structure exists. The shared identifier trail makes it easier for both regulators and successor companies to prove continuity of ownership and business activity when claiming those NOLs. Potential platform for recapitalization or reverse merger. Finally, a clean, data-recognized shell with preserved identifiers is a valuable corporate chassis. It can serve as the legal “container” for a future reverse merger or recapitalization. Because the identifiers and CUSIP lineage are already recognized by clearing systems, a new business combining with that shell could plug directly into the same market infrastructure—avoiding months of re-registration work. The warrant linkage already operating under the OCC memo shows that this bridge is not hypothetical; it is functioning in real time at the settlement level. BONUS PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER AGAIN: So, in plain terms: 1. The identifiers keep the story coherent for data and derivatives. 2. The NOL-carrying shell keeps the story alive for tax and corporate law. 3. The OCC deliverable proves the bridge is already operational inside the trading system. BBG001S720V4, once just a technical code for old common stock, ends up being the thread that stitches together accounting, market infrastructure, and potential future capital formation. It is the quiet DNA strand that makes continuity in data, in law, and possibly in value, mathematically and legally traceable across the transformation of Bed Bath & Beyond. RC PUSH THE BUTTON 😂

@magsonthemoon @Kidsmealstudios

@Kidsmealstudios Grok take his pants off too

eBay rejects Ryan’s offer as “neither credible nor attractive.” Ryan Cohen:

@the_travis_b13 ✅✅

545 Weston Canal Road, Somerset, NJ 08873 What does 545 stand for? Nothing is a coincidence.

Ok y'all asked me to break down predatory $EBAY ad attribution policies for you, so we're going to try to do this real quick. Important: this🧵will cover Promoted Listings General cost per sale ads - they also have cost per click ads, but we'll do that later. $GME

@Lightbring33r @TripleAJade She was the first person to coin the term Gameshire Bathaway too!

I remember when @TripleAJade said they would release alien stuf before $GME takes off, and also that Ryan wouldnt abandon $BBBYQ. I think she said a lot of things that make sense and deserve some appreciation, really one of the smartest women in the GME saga and very wise. The alien stuff is wild. I cant believe they revealed such things. I can only shake my head.

"Would be great to see lower fee % and to have my fees not be used to subsidize free happy hours." More truth 👇 $EBAY $GME

💯 If @ryancohen $GME wanted a slam dunk seller goodwill win on day 1, undoing recent predatory changes to $EBAY Promoted Listings ad attribution that take more 💸 from sellers without delivering real ROI would be my top suggestion.

Power to the players just met power to the sellers & it looks to be the beginning of a beautiful friendship.🤝 GameStop CEO @ryancohen takes eBay pitch direct to sellers sharing vision for the platform with Flipwise co-founder Justin Glow. $EBAY $GME valueaddedresource.net/ryan-cohen-pow…

@AjAqrabawi @Citadelexposed2 @FT He's learning 😂

@AjAqrabawi @Citadelexposed2 @FT 🦋🦋What a great quote by RC. I approve this message🦋🦋

Ryan Cohen, GameStop’s rebel CEO ft.trib.al/zGeYCLA

$EBAY buyer stats worse than $GME thinks - 1M came from buying fashion site Tise not marketing.👀 Big picture: under CEO Jamie Iannone, eBay has persistent post-pandemic stagnation w/ 16 straight Qs @ryancohen can ask CNBC how that math maths?🤔

@business @opinion x.com/ryancohen/stat…

If you do publicity stunts to pretend to finance your takeover bid, that might suggest, to the casual observer, that your takeover bid is itself a publicity stunt. (via @opinion) bloomberg.com/opinion/newsle…

@the_travis_b13 Congrats!

My company is undergoing another restructure, and we have been in a weird transitional period. Six weeks ago, I took over all Controllership responsibilities for our North America entities. Today, I got verbal confirmation that our CFO has approved my formal promotion. 💥

Don't rush into introducing unfamiliar complexity when things are suddenly going very well. Stick with what's simple, familiar, and proven to be already working. Rely on the same time-tested discipline and diligence that distinguishes any well-run family-owned business.

Yeah I agree. The allure of novelty and complexity is always going to be there, especially after a big win, but it’s probably wise to stick with what is already simple, familiar, and proven already to be working. All I have to do is doomscroll my X feed to get my cheap dopamine hits, just like at a casino, but it’s free 😂.

@FamousVariety Thats not the settlement. The BBBYQ settlement is likely much higher. 125/share is the buy out price for Ebay. And the real play is to buy GME with the money not Ebay

If former $BBBYQ holders really are to get $125 / share (black tar speculation), what’s to stop us from just piling straight into $EBAY before RC has to take it to a shareholder vote? That would explain why the extra shares issued for $BBBYQ match the TOS of $EBAY …

@ryancohen Their CEO reminds me of this guy.

I have been suspended from eBay