Morries w

141 posts

Morries w

Morries w

@morries_w

Katılım Ekim 2022
267 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
UnveiledChina
UnveiledChina@Unveiled_ChinaX·
Michael Ma, meet Guan Heng. In 2020 he traveled alone to Xinjiang, secretly filmed the detention camps, fled China, and was granted asylum by a US judge in January 2026 — because the court found he faced a "well-founded fear" of persecution if returned to China. After he released his footage, Chinese state security began systematically questioning his family members back home as collective punishment. That is not hearsay. That is a man who risked everything to show the world what the CCP has spent billions trying to hide — satellite image manipulation, journalist expulsions, diplomatic pressure, and collective punishment against anyone who speaks out. The camps do not exist, according to Beijing. So why does an entire government work this hard to silence one man with a camera? #Xinjiang #Uyghur #CCP #GuanHeng #HumanRights #China #Genocide #ForcedLabour #MichaelMa
UnveiledChina@Unveiled_ChinaX

When a sitting MP dismisses documented Uyghur forced labour as "hearsay" in parliament, that is not a gaffe. That is exactly the outcome Beijing's influence operations are designed to produce. The CCP's United Front Work Department does not need spies. It cultivates politicians, community organizations and business leaders across democracies who organically advance Beijing's narrative from inside democratic institutions. Canada is not unique here. United Front-linked organizations have been documented operating across Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the United States — embedding themselves into political parties, ethnic community groups and university campuses. #CCP #UnitedFront #ForeignInterference #Canada #Xinjiang #UyghurGenocide #HumanRights #Democracy

English
107
847
4K
217.1K
曲婉婷
曲婉婷@dongbeibisima89·
@zhaodajiang_ 是的,我是中国人,我也参拜过靖国神社,我们中国人没有一个是无辜的
中文
41
3
45
15.4K
赵大江(互fo)
赵大江(互fo)@zhaodajiang_·
原子弹下无冤魂 每一头被李梅烤熟的倭寇都不是无辜的
中文
59
50
498
33.2K
夏巢川 Rei Xia
夏巢川 Rei Xia@karasu_ga_warau·
So much disappointed by these media who calls an obvious CCP-propagandaist’s smearing of #Uyghur force labour issue as (what he claimed to be) slip of the tongue. The word ‘misreported’ is itself a shame for these medias when reporting #MichaelMa. The discussion on force labour has always been on Xinjiang (or East Turkestan). Not Shenzhen, not Beijing, not Shanghai, but Xinjiang where Uyghurs are the ethnic majority and tragedies done by CCP has been reported for the past decades. If a Canadian MP talks into the force labour topic, which has always been focused on Uyghurs in the whole session, in the past months and years, then there is no other place that can be sensibly pointed out except for Xinjiang. If this is a slip of tongue, why didn’t he, during his so-called ‘apology’, admit even once that ‘I do know about the systematic force labour now happening in Xinjiang…’? Instead he jumped over the topic completely, so as to the disgusting arrogance and narcissism he was showing during his speech. If this is a slip of tongue, why have CCP state medias already started praising Michael Ma for his speech, and returning to the ‘there is no force labour in Xinjiang’ bullshit in the same articles? What I know, interestingly, as a Chinese, is that the Chinese MFA spokespeople have been saying exactly the same words as this MP did: Have you been to Xinjiang? Have you seen it yourself? Are you a Uyghur? If not, then you are a lier aiming to destruct the superiousity of Socislism with Chinese Characteristics. How similar! If I as a nom-Uyhur Chinese can easily tell the absurdity of such apologies and explanations made by this CCP-bowing trash, then why can’t those medias do?
夏巢川 Rei Xia tweet media夏巢川 Rei Xia tweet media夏巢川 Rei Xia tweet media夏巢川 Rei Xia tweet media
Optimum Publishing International@opibooks

China forced labour: Michael Ma questions Xinjiang reports MP Ma issues an apology but falls way short on substance and remorse. He was cold and calculating and attempted to discredit McCuaig-Johnston ⁦@M_Johnston1⁩ ⁦@cburton001ctvnews.ca/politics/artic…

English
2
29
75
5.8K
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@denisewu Are you keeping quiet about the United States bombing a primary shcool and killed nearly 200 little girls? Are you keeping quiet about the United States assassinate leaders of other coury?😡
English
0
0
0
19
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@MelissaLMRogers you're totally wrong, MICHAEL MA is side with the truth and justice and fairness,DO NOT spread these lies
English
0
0
0
10
Melissa 🇨🇦
Melissa 🇨🇦@MelissaLMRogers·
No big deal but the MICHAEL MA story of course was trending in CHINA 🇨🇳 with state media amplifying it, and yes hundreds of praising comments and being called “A HERO” This is a test for CARNEY, and I’m afraid he will side with CHINA and forced Labour 🇨🇦
Melissa 🇨🇦 tweet media
English
83
475
960
15.5K
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@Terenceshen U.S. & Isarel openly admit they bombed the primary school full of girls, killed dozenes of thousands women and children in Gaza, publicly kidnap President, robbing their oil, publicly assassinate leaders of other country. you follow them to abuse china, russia and iran, WTF u're
English
0
0
0
58
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@Morris_LT 拥有最强的暴力,强盗们还需要讲什么文明啊,规则啊,劳动啊什么的吗,直接抢就行了啊,不给,那就杀掉他们啊。早期改变人类文明的科技发明,哪一个不是在大航海的需要、殖民和杀戮的需要下发明出来的?为什么最初的科学家都是出身贵族或者是贵族的附庸,他们为谁的利益服务的?
中文
0
0
1
474
Morris
Morris@Morris_LT·
有人问,说为什么改变人类文明的科技全都起源于欧美呢?为什么中国历史这么悠久的一个文明古国却发展不出来什么牛逼科技呢?你就想想啊,如果说你能在大热天带着全家去避暑山庄,还能安排几十个人给你扇扇子,你说你还用发明空调吗?有这个必要吗?如果说你能发动几十万人去修这个长城,那你还需要发明这个吊机吗?如果你能安排16个人给你抬轿子,那你还用发明汽车吗?没有这个必要了吗?假如说你手握生杀大权,普天之下莫非王土,那你还愿意走向文明,走向民主吗?对不对?所以说呢,阻碍科技进步的最大阻力,它并不是科技的本身,而是特权,因为特权阶级它用不着科技,他更不需要文明。
中文
75
68
470
41.5K
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@KareemRifai following that lying guys, just like you're eating bullshit
English
0
0
0
53
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@TerryGlavin so evil, you‘re attacking the people who tells the truth
English
0
0
0
6
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@moreless 再讲个笑话: 当地政府为了发展当地经济、改善当地人民的生活水平,创造就业机会,为新兴企业提供了大量政策扶持(土地、金融、人才、税收、行政效率……),结果那个狗日的,一听说自己有机会发财,唯一的代价就是抛弃为他提供各种机会哺育他长大的母亲,他就毫不犹豫地下手斩断了和他娘的一切联系…
中文
1
1
3
1.8K
moreless
moreless@moreless·
你接到了一通电话。 去北京报到。 中国的国家发改委(NDRC)要见你。 你坐在他们对面。他们对一切了如指掌。 公司的重组。 迁往新加坡的举动。 来自 Benchmark 的 7500 万美元投资。 来自 Meta 的 20 亿美元收购金。 你在北京裁掉的那 80 名员工。 以及你决定不再向中国市场提供的产品。 他们提问。你作答。 会议结束了。 你被禁止出境,无法离开中国。 没有指控。没有逮捕。没有审判。也没有明确的期限。 你可以在国内任何地方旅行。 上海。深圳。成都。你想去哪儿都行。 唯独不能离开这个国家。 你的本名叫肖红。大家习惯叫你“Red”。你今年 32 岁。 这就是你走到这一步的始末。 你在中国中部地区长大。攻读了工程学专业。 你开发过各种应用程序(App)。而且做得非常出色。 随后,你打造了 Manus。 这是一个人工智能代理(AI agent),它不仅仅会“说话”,更能真正地“干活”。 它是一位数字员工,没有国界,无需签证,不分国籍。 短短 8 个月内,营收便突破了 1 亿美元。 然而,你是中国人。 而美国刚刚颁布禁令,禁止美国投资者向中国的 AI 领域注资。 一夜之间,你的公司便失去了投资价值。 于是,你做出了全球所有聪明创业者都会做出的选择。 你在新加坡注册成立了公司主体。 美国人通常会选择特拉华州。 欧洲人通常会选择爱尔兰。 印度人通常会选择迪拜。 这并非犯罪,而是一种商业策略。 你的律师建议你这么做。你的投资人也建议你这么做。所有人都建议你这么做。 你将整个公司进行了迁移。新加坡、东京、旧金山…… 你关闭了北京的办公室。 裁掉了在中国境内的 80 名员工。 并停止向中国市场提供你的产品。 彻底的切割。如今,这已是一家全球化的公司。 Benchmark 为你开出了一张 7500 万美元的支票。 随后,Meta 打来了电话。 20 亿美元。 全资收购。并授予你副总裁(VP)的职位。 你所打造的 AI 技术将被整合进 Facebook、Instagram 和 WhatsApp——触达数十亿用户。 你年仅 32 岁,却刚刚缔造了历史上规模最大的一笔“中国背景 AI 公司被美国巨头收购”的交易。 你的母亲为你感到骄傲。 你飞回了中国。为了探望家人,也为了彻底告别过去的生活。 你没有丝毫犹豫。 那是家。你这一生,一直在回家的路上。 随后,你接到了那通电话。 而此刻,你正坐在北京,与国家发改委(NDRC)的官员们隔桌相望;他们正告知你:你不能离开。 北京传达的信息简单明了: 你生于斯。 你在此创业立业。 你在此求学深造。 代码始于此。 知识产权亦源于此。 一个新加坡的住址,并不能让你成为新加坡人。 一家开曼群岛的控股公司,并不能让你变成无国籍者。 一张印着 Meta 标志的名片,并不能让你摇身变为美国人。 他们将此斥之为“新加坡洗白”(Singapore washing)。 而你,就这样沦为了那个“典型”。 美国曾要求你离开中国。 而中国却告诉你:你从未真正离开过。 两个超级大国。两套截然不同的规则。 这两套规则同时作用于你。而无论哪一方,都不曾征询过你的意愿。 此刻,你的 AI 产品已在全球 50 个国家上线运行。 无需护照,无需签证,更不受任何限制。 它正服务着数百万计的用户,而你却只能枯坐于此。 你亲手打造出了那个能够抵达地球上任何角落的造物。 然而,那个唯一无法自由通行的,却恰恰是你自己。
George Pu@TheGeorgePu

You get a phone call. Report to Beijing. China's NDRC wants to see you. You sit down across from them. They know everything. The restructuring. The Singapore move. The $75 million from Benchmark. The $2 billion from Meta. The 80 employees you laid off in Beijing. The product you made unavailable in China. They ask questions. You answer. The meeting ends. You are exit-banned from China. No charges. No arrest. No trial. No timeline. You can travel anywhere inside the country. Shanghai. Shenzhen. Chengdu. Wherever you want. You just can't leave. Your name is Xiao Hong. You go by Red. You're 32. This is how you got here. You grew up in central China. Studied engineering. Built apps. You were good at it. Then you built Manus. An AI agent that doesn't just talk - it works. A digital employee with no borders, no visa, no nationality. $100 million in revenue in 8 months. But you're Chinese. And America just banned Americans from investing in Chinese AI. Overnight, your company is un-investable. So you do what every smart founder on earth does. You incorporate in Singapore. Americans do this with Delaware. Europeans do this with Ireland. Indians do this with Dubai. It's not a crime. It's a strategy. Your lawyers told you to do it. Your investors told you to do it. Everyone told you to do it. You move the whole company. Singapore. Tokyo. San Francisco. You shut down the Beijing office. Lay off 80 people in China. Make your product unavailable in the Chinese market. Clean break. Global company now. Benchmark writes you a $75 million check. Then Meta calls. $2 billion. Full acquisition. VP title. Your AI goes into Facebook. Instagram. WhatsApp. Billions of users. You're 32 and you just built the biggest Chinese-to-American AI exit in history. Your mom is proud of you. You fly back to China. To see family. To close out the old life. You don't think twice. It's home. You've been going home your whole life. Then you get the call. And now you're sitting across from the NDRC in Beijing and they're telling you that you can't leave. Beijing's message is simple. You were born here. You built this here. You learned here. The code started here. The IP started here. A Singapore address doesn't make you Singaporean. A Cayman holding company doesn't make you stateless. A Meta business card doesn't make you American. They're calling it 'Singapore washing.' You just became the example. The US told you to leave China. China told you that you never left. Two superpowers. Two sets of rules. Both applied to you. Neither asked. Your AI is live in 50 countries right now. No passport. No visa. No restrictions. Serving millions of people while you sit here. You built the thing that goes anywhere on earth. You're the one who can't.

中文
160
310
1.9K
673.7K
Morries w
Morries w@morries_w·
@moreless 讲个笑话: 那80个兄弟在创业的时候是996/007的并肩作战的好兄弟,大家要一起奋斗,准备一起发财,被收购的时候就变成了他们只是已经被付过工资的雇员而已,而且有钱的大爷说了,不摆脱那些累赘,你拿不到那些钱,所以他们就毫不留情的被裁掉了……
中文
2
0
74
3.2K
Morries w retweetledi
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
So did China invade multiple sovereign states, kidnap presidents, assassinate foreign leaders, and bomb a primary school full of girls? Did China close the Strait of Hormuz and send global oil prices soaring? Or is this just Washington setting fire to the region again, then making the rest of the world pay for its own stupidity?
English
4
22
318
5K
Morries w retweetledi
Ali Feizi 费爱理 Adili
A Firsthand Response to Canada’s Parliamentary Questions on Xinjiang: Observations from the Ground As you deliberate on matters concerning Xinjiang, I write to offer a perspective grounded not in geopolitical rhetoric, but in direct, firsthand experience. I have traveled to Xinjiang three times in the past 9 month visiting Urumqi, Kashgar (Kashi), and Tashkurgan. What I witnessed stands in stark contrast to the narratives that often dominate Western parliamentary discussions. The suggestion, frequently raised in Western chambers, that Xinjiang’s cultural sites or Muslim communities require "protection" from China is not only baseless but deeply hypocritical. It deflects attention from the West’s own failures to safeguard minority rights while weaponizing human rights to destabilize sovereign nations. Cultural Preservation and Religious Freedom Are a Reality, Not a Talking Point During my visits, I observed a society where culture is not merely preserved but celebrated. In Kashgar, I marveled at ancient Uyghur villages and vibrant bazaars where artisans continue centuries-old traditions of pottery, textiles, and music—supported by government-funded cultural centers and museums. I traveled to Tashkurgan, home to the Tajik people, where I was able to converse in my native Farsi, a testament to the preservation of linguistic diversity. Regarding religious freedom, I attended mosques where daily prayers were conducted without hindrance. I witnessed Muslims freely observing Ramadan and celebrating Eid with public festivities supported by local authorities. Halal food is widely available, and the freedom of religious belief guaranteed by China’s Constitution is evident in daily life. This commitment to religious harmony stands in sharp contrast to the rising Islamophobia, church vandalism, and religious discrimination plaguing many Western nations today. The most compelling evidence comes from the people themselves. In every city I visited, I spoke with Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Tajiks, and Han Chinese. Across the board, individuals expressed pride in being Chinese citizens. Women spoke of their freedoms, economic, social, and cultural, without the shadow of extremism. One Uyghur shopkeeper shared how his children learn both Mandarin and Uyghur in school, ensuring they can embrace their heritage while accessing broader opportunities. I attended weddings where joyful celebrations took place free from the influence of radical ideologies. The people of Xinjiang are not suffering; they are thriving. To suggest otherwise is to ignore their voices in favor of geopolitical agendas and the desires of Muslim extremists who seek to turn this beautiful region into a place like Afghanistan under Taliban rule. The people of Xinjiang have rejected that path. Development and Unity, Not Coercion China’s approach in Xinjiang is rooted in unity, development, and respect for all ethnicities. The government has invested heavily in infrastructure—modern highways, and expanded airports—connecting once-remote areas and boosting local economies. Poverty-alleviation programs have provided new housing, schools, and hospitals. Farmers receive subsidies and training to adopt sustainable practices, increasing their incomes. Rather than suppression, I witnessed a model of holistic progress that has lifted millions out of poverty, eradicated extremism, and created a society where diversity is celebrated. The harmony among China’s 1.4 billion people speaks louder than any politically driven falsehoods. A Call for Reflection and Dialogue I respectfully suggest that rather than spreading unverified claims about Xinjiang, Western nations, including Canada should reflect on their own systemic inequities. True respect for human rights begins with honoring sovereignty, rejecting interference, and fostering dialogue. It does not come through slander. Xinjiang is open to the world. I have seen it with my own eyes. @CanadianPM @MarkJCarney #Xinjiang #China
Ali Feizi 费爱理 Adili tweet mediaAli Feizi 费爱理 Adili tweet mediaAli Feizi 费爱理 Adili tweet mediaAli Feizi 费爱理 Adili tweet media
English
11
36
174
2.9K
Morries w retweetledi
Ali Feizi 费爱理 Adili
A Canadian’s Disappointment: What I Actually Saw on the Ground in Xinjiang vs. What Ottawa Claims As a Canadian, I have always taken pride in my country’s commitment to human rights, due diligence, and evidence-based foreign policy. We are a nation that prides itself on “peacekeeping,” not warmongering; on diplomacy, not hyperbole. That is why I find myself profoundly disappointed—not just as a Canadian, but as a citizen of a country that claims to value truth—when I listen to the Parliamentary Questions coming out of Ottawa regarding Xinjiang. The language used in is alarming. Terms like "concentration camps" are thrown around with a casual certainty that bears no resemblance to the reality I have witnessed with my own eyes. Having made three trips to the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in the last nine months, I have seen a reality that is diametrically opposed to the narrative being pushed by our Members of Parliament. I am not a journalist embedded with a government delegation; I am a Canadian who traveled independently. I went expecting to verify the headlines we see in Canadian media. Instead, what I found was a region vibrant with culture, actively preserved and proudly showcased. Here is what I observed on the ground, and why I believe Ottawa’s rhetoric is not only wrong but dangerously disconnected from the facts. The Cultural Reality I Witnessed During my three trips, I spent time in Kashgar, Urumqi, Tashkurgan and the surrounding areas. The narrative I was sold in Canada was one of cultural erasure. The reality I experienced was the exact opposite. 1. The Old City of Kashgar One of the most striking examples of cultural preservation is the Old City of Kashgar. Canadian politicians describe a region being "flattened" or "assimilated." Yet, I walked through the labyrinthine alleyways of this ancient Uygur city, which has been meticulously preserved as a historical site. The local government didn’t tear it down; they invested in upgrading the infrastructure, running water, natural gas lines, and earthquake proofing, while maintaining the traditional Uygur architecture, wooden pillars, and intricate brickwork. In the evenings, I watched in the alleyways while children ran through streets paved with traditional kuzi bricks. This wasn’t a ghost town; it was a living, breathing historical center. 2. The Grand Bazaar and Livelihoods The Id Kah Bazaar in Kashgar is not only open; it is thriving. I saw Uygur artisans selling hand-engraved copperware, traditional atlas silk, and locally grown dried fruits. Far from being forced into labor, I spoke with shop owners who explained that tourism encouraged by the government’s infrastructure investments had allowed them to expand their family businesses. If the goal were cultural genocide, as some Canadian MPs allege, why would the state invest billions into preserving the mihrabs in mosques, restoring the Id Kah Mosque (one of the largest in China), and promoting Uygur cuisine and music festivals? It simply doesn’t add up. 3. Videos from the Ground I am sharing some videos in my posts to show the reality. In one clip, you can see Uygur dance another a traditional wedding I went too. The Disconnect in Ottawa As a Canadian, this embarrasses me. We claim to be a nation that stands for truth and reconciliation. Yet, when given the opportunity to send independent observers or journalists to verify facts, our government often chooses to boycott or criticize the very invitation for transparency. If our Parliament is going to make accusations as severe as "genocide" and "concentration camps," the onus is on them to provide evidence. My three trips over the last nine months provided evidence of the opposite: a region where Uygur culture is not only preserved but celebrated, and where the so-called "camps" are actually vocational training centres, facilities I drove by I that looked into them focused on giving people skills in Mandarin and industrial skills. #Xinjiang
English
136
345
1.3K
67.6K
Sam Cooper
Sam Cooper@scoopercooper·
Context of testimony. EVs and “Xinjiang” — Michael MA, on the balance of evidence and probability is lying. He needs to be removed from caucus unless @MarkJCarney stands behind him, as he did Paul Chiang, the incumbent that had to step down after HK diaspora outrage forced it.
Luke de Pulford@lukedepulford

Judge for yourself. Shenzhen or Xinjiang? @MPMichaelMa said “you claim that there’s forced labour in…” and then attacked. So, was the witness @M_Johnston1’s testimony about Shenzhen? Let’s see 🤥🤥🤥

English
47
429
983
14.6K
Andrew Scheer
Andrew Scheer@AndrewScheer·
Mark Carney must take responsibility for a change and denounce his MP’s appalling comments on forced labour. There was no confusion. Watch the witness say Ma told her after the committee meeting that he "doesn't believe in reports" about Chinese forced labour in Xinjiang.
National Newswatch@natnewswatch

Liberal MP Michael Ma sorry after confusion over remarks on forced labour in China nationalnewswatch.com/2026/03/26/lib… #nationlnewswatch via @natnewswatch

English
107
709
2.8K
68.7K