mike whelan

A hidden government program. A brutal murder. A soldier desperate to bury the past. A journalist determined to uncover the truth. When a charismatic figure promising redemption recruits an Air Force medic into a covert mission, Evan discovers the cost: Disclosure has lethal consequences. No jury. No trial. Judged in abstentia by program administrators, the sentence is death, and it’s all legal. Is he protecting humanity, or giving up his own? Hannah is a former intelligence officer whose investigation is blocked at every turn by a seemingly all powerful government agency. As she gets too close, she’s targeted for assassination. How far will they go to learn the secrets of: The Legacy Program

@Mattybigballin @dom_lucre Why didn't she just comply? They don't need to explain it to you. It's not a debate or negotiation.

@dom_lucre “Why didn’t she just comply” Notice how white people aren’t asking this question like they do when this happens to black people…

🔥🚨BREAKING: This recently footage has thousands of Americans debating if the moment El Paso police officers struggled to arrest a 28-year-old woman with a warrant which resulted in police getting extremely physical with her was brutality or not.

@long_slong21 @ricwe123 I'm willing to listen, what is it? When one subset of the population is consistently violent and reckless, one would have cause to expect the same. Would you like me to link 200, 300 400 500 or more similar videos? It would take less than an hour, within the last ten days.

@mpaulwhelan @ricwe123 That fact you don’t see the differences in these two videos just shows your level of ignorance

For black people in the United States, even routine encounters with police can be perilous......

@MiddleOfMayhem He wasn't? What information do you have to the contrary and what bearing does it have? Are you saying he intentionally tried to lie, mispoke, or was misinformed, or what? What's your point? google.com/search?q=Was+(…

I actually spoke with McKernan, briefly, on the phone back in 2021 after I cold-called him. Me: "Was (Lue) Elizondo the director of AATIP?" McKernan: "Yes." I later found out that wasn't true. McKernan would not answer my follow up questions.

@Fran_Casaretto_ She voted for that.

Un video viral en EE.UU. está causando revuelo: un alumno le encajó dos tremendos cachetazos a una profesora porque le sacó el vaper que estaba usando en plena clase. Lo que era una medida disciplinaria terminó en agresión. Después lloran cuando los llaman monos

@RedPandaKoala Believe about what? His education? No. That Ed Teller met him, liked him, got him a job, punching above his weight, to see if a tinkerer could make any better sense of the craft, thinking he was a fellow scientist/clever guy, and that he worked on alien tech? Yes, that I believe

Do you believe Bob Lazar?

@MiddleOfMayhem SAIC gatekeeper will obfuscate, distract, misdirect, malign and obscure for free ... lol

April 9 - scientist who debunked UFOs with facts and evidence will be speaking FOR FREE April 23 - UFO celebrity who never provided evidence of his claims to fame and who's been caught in several lies will speak for $47 with $272 "meet and greet" add-on

@EndWokeness Yup, keep voting for it. Eventually there will be a backlash. Maybe England will even get to have free speech again. Some day.

@spacebananaco @MickWest Not several ... 50+ now. Only 6-9 have come forward, probably because people keep being murdered ... facebook.com/reel/946328951…

@MickWest @mpaulwhelan So there haven’t been several ex- U.S. military or U.S. government officials say they believe non-human intelligence has been visiting Earth?

Bill thinks aliens are visiting because men with serious haircuts saw things 10-20 years ago that they couldn't figure out.

@spacebananaco @MickWest Yes, that's correct. They testified, under oath, in a SCIF to discuss classified information, to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (senate approved position), that they rcovrd & revrs engineerd the tech, who then found their claims to be "credible and urgent."

By that logic, anyone who's ever told a lie can't be believed about anything they ever say again. Meaning no one can ever be trusted. But of course, discerning which lies to believe or not is an everyday thing. Maybe he was embarrassed, and padded a bit. We've all lied a little ... it doesn't affect his eyesight ...

UFOlogist Stan Friedman is the one who disclosed Bob Lazar faked degrees from MIT & Caltech, but @g_Knapp says he believes Lazar’s equally fraudulent alien stories because he wants them to be true. Sorry George, that’s not how science works. If we have alien spaceships show them to us, otherwise you’ve just got stories, which are not evidence.

@BelAves @michaelshermer Imagine saying in the 1700's that man will stand on the moon, or that everything you see is made of atoms, or protons, or quarks, or that matter is energy, or that electrons flow around a nucleus, but cannot be measured - and they knew reality better than we understand gravity.

@michaelshermer Richard Feynman (late and great) is my Danny Downer, THE wet blanket, killjoy. I also think he is probably correct. He doesn't even say a hard no, just a probably not. youtube.com/watch?v=3tGcCi…

Aliens are very probably out there somewhere. Aliens have very probably not come here. The belief that they have is a type of religion. I explain how and why here. (I am willing to change my mind when the evidence changes—show us the bodies/craft.) skeptic.com/article/why-ua…

@michaelshermer In the end, it's your lack of curiosity I find odd as a sceptic. You cherry pick the easy to debunk and use them as a basis for discounting the more credible issues. There's a mountn of evidence, enough to seek resolution, but you only want to look once it's already proven? Why?

@michaelshermer An ICIG, who, by the way, found their claims urgent and credible? So it's what you don't address, not anything you say that's invalid. Some pilot misidentifying a buoy at 50 miles doesn't invalidate Fravor's sight at 1/4 mile, backed up by 3 others seeing the same thing.

@michaelshermer & what of the 50+ ppl who testified to the ICIG that they personally worked in legacy retrieval programs, reverse engineering alien tech? People who are drug & psyche screened, with high clearances, with no reason to lie, and there are dozens of them. Can U address that pls?

@michaelshermer Lots of good stuff and rational thinking, but it's what you don't address that stands out. What about Fravor's testimony (along with Dietrich's & the 2 bkstrs) that they witnessed a 40 foot butane tank ping ponging over the water, in ways that defy gravity/centrifugal forces?

@MickWest Which? Grusch said there are recovered non-human craft and non-human bodies. Schumer and Rounds put forth a bill to recover craft housed by pvt. areosp. of a non-hmn origin. 50+ whstlblrs claim that they worked on non-human craft were deemed "urgent & credible." So which?

@mpaulwhelan No, they have not.

It's time to consider that the Legacy Program is real, and to think about why it's been kept secret all these years. This may be a fictional account, but the underlying issues are as real as it gets. Kickstarter in June 2026. kickstarter.com/projects/m1kf/…

@michaelshermer Are you too ingrained in your position to consider that Rubio, Clapper, Trump, Obama, Schumer, Gillibrand, Grusch, Nell, Luna, Gabbard, Rounds, Bush, 50+ under oath whistleblowers, might be telling the truth? Rationality demands revision when new data is available. It's time.

Actually, this is partially true. Since, as I argue, UFOs are a type of religious belief, to then suspect them to be demons (or angels in other beliefs) is a type of supernaturalism (as are aliens as multi-dimensional beings).