Ken Parsons 🇺🇸

18.8K posts

Ken Parsons 🇺🇸 banner
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸

Ken Parsons 🇺🇸

@mr_e_guy

Christian Conservative 🇺🇸 Political Observer 🇺🇸 Father 🇺🇸 Uncle 🇺🇸 Grampy 🇺🇸. Love my family and my USA 🇺🇸 Late Boomer.

Arkansas, USA Katılım Eylül 2013
3.1K Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸@mr_e_guy·
@apinionsvary @TomCottonAR I have voted for you and promoted your candidacy. Now it is your turn. If you fail, my vote and many others will NOT go to you. America is fatigued. We aren’t going to take it any more.
English
0
0
0
0
Jay Gatling
Jay Gatling@apinionsvary·
🚨 WANT TO REPLACE JOHN THUNE AS MAJORITY LEADER? HERE’S EXACTLY HOW IT WORKS RIGHT NOW. NO 60 VOTES. NO DEMOCRATS. JUST REPUBLICANS! Step 1: 5 Republican Senators send a written request to Conference Chairman Tom Cotton demanding a special meeting. Step 2: Cotton MUST call the full Republican Conference. Step 3: They vote by secret ballot on new leadership. Step 4: A simple majority wins. That’s just 27 out of 53 Republican Senators. That’s it. The mechanism exists TODAY. Where are the 5 with the spine to start it? America is watching. Get it done 🇺🇸
Jay Gatling tweet media
English
650
3.6K
7.1K
65K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@DataRepublican “Purposefully sneaky,” isn’t that redundant? Republicans in league w/ those mean Democrats used the rules to outmaneuver the suspicious Republicans, Good grief!!! What a dyslexic’s nightmare. A Charlie Brown, in name only, ran at the ball, Lucy held it steady, *KICKED* GOAL!!! 💁🏼‍♂️
GIF
English
0
0
0
9
Sassafrass84
Sassafrass84@Sassafrass_84·
It's 11 in the morning, and so far, I have been called a stupid b*tch, a wh*re, and a c*nt. Was told to suck more c*ck. Is it me, or are people becoming more unhinged as they go unchecked online? It amazes me how comfortable people are being absolutely vile and horrible to others just because they dont agree with their political views. Civil discourse is dead.
English
3.6K
859
9K
140.3K
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
The Senate’s in an abusive relationship with the Zombie Filibuster The American people can’t afford it It’s time to end it
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee

How did we get to be $39 trillion in debt? The zombie filibuster—coupled with a chronic unwillingness among senators to break through it by putting in the hard work—has contributed to it substantially. For decades, this dynamic has been giving Senate Democrats way too much power when it comes to spending bills—even when they’re in the minority. Spending bills in the Senate routinely get to 60 votes—regardless of who’s in the majority and who controls the House and the White House—with votes coming from (1) basically every Senate Democrat and (2) a much smaller group of Republicans (predominantly members of the Appropriations Committee), in many cases just a few more than whatever it takes to achieve cloture. As a result, disagreements on spending bills tend to be resolved by simply spending more—to give those voting for it what they need to vote for it. This is one of many reasons why I’ve been pushing so hard on the talking filibuster which, if fully utilized and given the time it needs to work, could help us pass the SAVE America Act. But the benefits wouldn’t end there, as they could help us avoid not only the kind of shutdown hell we’re now experiencing, but also rein in our debt and deficit—at least while Republicans are in charge. Share if you’d like to see the Senate use the talking filibuster—to fully fund DHS, to pass the SAVE America Act, to reduce spending, and otherwise!

English
370
1.2K
3.9K
40.9K
Tom Cotton
Tom Cotton@SenTomCotton·
Democrats want to protect illegal migrants by banning ICE officers from wearing masks. That’s why TSA lines are so long.
English
581
164
800
27.7K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@DataRepublican @rollyson_w @CrankyAmerican Though I suspect the solid right has lost patience, and don’t need to be paid to do what is necessary for the preservation of the great American experiment. About 9 million to start, will do. We have that many former and current military. This is an American issue.
English
0
0
0
3
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
@CrankyAmerican Exactly. People ask why the Right doesn't mobilize. The reason is simple. Nobody pays to mobilize us, because we just aren't useful tools for regime change and population control.
English
380
2.1K
10.4K
74.3K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
The Left's favorite move when confronted with evidence is to mock an argument nobody made. Nobody said the rank and file people who showed up yesterday were paid. What Asra Nomani has documented, with thorough receipts, is the infrastructure that put them there. The grants that funded the texting campaigns. The printing presses. The advertisements. The logistics coordination for parking and transportation. The sign-making sessions days before. The organizers caught on video stating their objectives explicitly. That's an industry. And it's flush with money. Not just from the usual Soros-adjacent networks... teachers' union grants, institutional foundations, CCP money, even federal science funding. Look at NSF grants in hard sciences and you'll find DEI compliance language promising to "raise up leaders from underserved communities." It feeds the same pipeline. Countless billions are being spent by organizers who openly describe their efforts in terms of color revolution and regime change. To kick Trump out. That's what Nomani reports on. That's what's leaking out to the public consciousness. That's what they don't want you looking at.
Asra Nomani@AsraNomani

Our investigation did not assert that protesters were “paid” or that “$3B revenue Marxist companies” exist — claims that protest industry defenders are trying to claim and then “correct” in Community Notes. The evidence instead shows an ecosystem of nonprofits, advocacy groups and political organizations with $3B in combined revenues operating within the same protest infrastructure to sponsor #NoKings. They include Marxist, communist and socialist groups. When protest industry defenders respond by refuting claims that were never made, they are engaging a straw-man argument rather than the reporting itself. It’s something most industries (and people) do when confronting scrutiny. Don’t fall for it, @CommunityNotes.

English
186
4K
12.2K
251.6K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@SenateGOP This is what I see in my head when RINOs complain about those mean Democrats outmaneuvering them, again… and again… Good grief!
GIF
English
0
0
0
0
Senate Republicans
Senate Republicans@SenateGOP·
Thank a Democrat for long lines and disrupted air travel. Thank President Trump for doing everything he can to keep airports open.
English
2.9K
295
1.8K
2.5M
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@ZeekArkham In order for them to be experienced, they must be allowed to affect us. Some things don’t need to be experienced. No turd needs to be smelled, seeing is believing. Keep that s**t at a distance. If it helps, I will agree that you are owed an apology.
English
0
0
0
2
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@ZeekArkham That’s his problem. Thats really sad too. But… when someone drops a turd in front of me, I leave that s**t alone. Our smell receptors work just like our tastebuds on steroids. Both have to have a “sample” to taste/smell… contact… ingestion. Bad words are the same…
English
1
0
0
4
Zeek Arkham 🇺🇸
Zeek Arkham 🇺🇸@ZeekArkham·
Had a friend I’ve known for almost twenty years call me this morning. He found this account and my IG. Cursed me out, called me a “coon,” said he doesn’t f**k with “MAGA supporters,” and told me not to ever contact him again. I hadn’t even had my coffee yet… like, bruh… let me at least be awake for this. You’re this level of mad before breakfast? When I started speaking up years ago, I knew I was going against the grain. I knew I’d lose friends. I knew I’d lose family. Unfortunately, tribalism and cult-brain are rampant on the other side, especially amongst black folks. Oh well… sucks, but I’m not going to stop being who I am. On to the next one.
English
2.3K
2.7K
31.7K
383.5K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@Ravious101 @five4life No sequitur. One is a tax on gains before selling. The other is a real estate property tax, based on current value. Neither tax is truly justifiable. Flawed argument against property taxes going up as value increases. County expenses do not increase w/ property values increasing.
English
0
0
0
10
Victor Bigham 🇺🇸
Victor Bigham 🇺🇸@Ravious101·
THE HUNTINGTON COUNTY INDIANA NEWS · Steve Harrison · · OPINION... I’m being taxed on money I never made. Let that sink in. I bought my property outright for $138,000 in 2001. Now the county says it’s worth $246,000. Did I sell it? No. Did I make a profit? No. Did I get a check for $246,000? No. But my taxes jumped like I did. That’s the problem. This isn’t income. This isn’t cash. This is a number someone decided on paper — and now I’m being billed for it. If my stock portfolio doubles, I don’t pay taxes until I sell. If my income doesn’t increase, I don’t magically owe more income tax. So why does owning a home work differently? Why am I being taxed on unrealized gains? A house isn’t just an investment — it’s where people live. And this system means you can do everything right, pay off your home, and still get squeezed harder every year because of a number you never turned into money. You don’t truly own something if you can be taxed out of it. This isn’t about “services” or “inflation.” It’s about being charged for value you never received. And people are starting to notice.
English
969
8.8K
20.1K
236.5K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
Musk on his meeting with Bill Gates “Just conviction wearing $132 billion net worth as a credential.”
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Bill Gates walked into the Tesla Gigafactory and declared the long-range electric semi impossible. The truck was already in production. Pepsi was running it on live routes. Musk: “I was like, well, but we literally have them. And you can drive them. And Pepsi is literally using them right now.” Gates was standing inside the factory that built the vehicle he was dismissing. It existed. It was moving freight. Musk: “He’s like, ‘No, no, it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work.’ And I’m like… I’m kind of stuck here.” Musk didn’t argue. He asked for the math. Musk: “You must think we can’t achieve the energy density of the battery pack, or that the watt-hours per mile of the truck is too high. Which one of those numbers do you think we have wrong, and what numbers do you think are correct?” Gates didn’t have wrong numbers. He had no numbers. Musk: “He didn’t know any of the numbers.” The co-founder of Microsoft walked into an operating factory, stood next to a truck hauling Pepsi’s freight, and declared it impossible without a single figure. No energy density. No efficiency metric. No math. Just conviction wearing a $130 billion net worth as a credential. Musk: “Doesn’t it seem that it’s perhaps premature to conclude that a long-range semi cannot work if you do not know the energy density of the battery pack or the energy efficiency of the truck chassis?” One question. Nowhere left to stand. Musk: “You’d think he’d be really quite strong in the sciences. But actually, he is not strong in the sciences. It is really surprising.” Gates built his empire on software. Abstraction. Code that never has to satisfy a physics equation. Musk builds in atoms. Battery cells have energy densities. Truck chassis have drag coefficients. A semi either makes the route or it doesn’t. There is no patch. Physics does not negotiate. Thirty years inside abstraction and a man starts believing his intuition applies everywhere. It doesn’t. The truck exists. The routes are logged. Pepsi is running them. Gates declared it impossible and couldn’t produce the math to prove it. The truck already had.

English
0
0
1
28
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@ScarletReeds @MccDon44307 This is a dyslexic’s nightmare… IFKYK. Did Lucy (Dems) hold the football for Charlie Brown to kick it good and hard? Did they switch roles and let Charlie actually kick the football? Did Lucy clone herself and replace Charlie?
GIF
English
0
0
1
21
Reeds
Reeds@ScarletReeds·
Let's talk about John Barrasso (R-WY, Majority Whip): Senator John Barrasso, as Senate Majority Whip, played a CENTRAL role in pushing through the partial DHS funding bill at 3 a.m. in a near-empty Senate chamber. The bill funded TSA, FEMA, Coast Guard and other parts of DHS — but explicitly excluded new/additional funding for ICE and key CBP enforcement operations. Barrasso was on the floor declaring “Time is up” and helped whip support (or at least non-objection) for the unanimous consent deal. Probably spent hours calling making sure he cleared without a recorded vote or real debate. Publicly, Barrasso was rightly tough on Democrats — calling out their obstruction, airport chaos, and saying they had “blood on their hands” for blocking full funding and prioritizing restrictions on ICE over security. But when it came time to close the deal, the Whip helped deliver Democrats exactly what they’d demanded for weeks: DHS funding minus real immigration enforcement resources. This sets a dangerous precedent. Voice vote. No roll call. No public accountability on who was there or objected. Then straight to recess. We needed a stand for full border security funding — not a midnight carve-out. Leader Johnson and House Republicans are already pushing back and rejecting this approach. Time for Senate Republicans to show real leverage on ICE/deportations via reconciliation or whatever it takes. No more 3 a.m. surrenders. Should leadership like Barrasso be held accountable for optics and outcomes like this?
Reeds tweet media
English
490
1.3K
2.1K
21K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
What I see in my imagination every time Republicans complain about the mean Democrats.
GIF
English
0
0
0
10
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
My respect for Speaker Mike Johnson just increased dramatically. He is saying NO to the Senate version of DHS funding. They are sending it back to the Senate and demanding full funding.
English
159
928
7.9K
171.8K
Mila Joy
Mila Joy@Milajoy·
What is the chance that Joe Biden got 81 million votes in 2020? 0%-100%.
English
1.2K
100
785
26.3K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@ScottforFlorida @realimtan Uncomplicate it. Use the existing rules, stop strategizing a false blame game, stop pretending and actually DO your jobs. If passing SAA creates a wholly new precedent, so be it. Right now, Rep Senators look like Charlie Brown, flat on his back saying “Good grief” again! Lucy🤣
English
0
0
0
5
Rick Scott
Rick Scott@ScottforFlorida·
The filibuster was NEVER supposed to be a weapon for the radical left to stop us from delivering on President Trump’s agenda. IT MUST GO!
English
1.9K
2.7K
13.9K
228.4K
Ken Parsons 🇺🇸
@SenateGOP Just tell us that Republicans are ineffective. Because that’s the truth. Lucy keeps pulling the football and Charlie Brown keeps saying “Good grief,” flat on his back. We saw that back in the 60s every Sunday morning. That tells us what Republicans Senators think of us. Lucy too!
English
0
0
1
13
Senate Republicans
Senate Republicans@SenateGOP·
Democrats have kept the Department of Homeland Security closed for 42 days. They’ve caused pain for American workers and travelers, and they have nothing to show for it. ICE is fully funded, and Republicans will make sure it stays that way without any of the Democrats’ so-called reforms that put agents and their families in danger.
English
1.3K
227
788
25.9K