ZIM MADRIDSTAS
40 posts

Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@justiceferod @daddyhope @tanatawa2004 Bussing people people from where to where. When people are already there?
English

@daddyhope @tanatawa2004 Tell me, why didn’t the opposition organize bussing in people? Once again, opposition has missed opportunities…
English

Everyone supporting Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 should remember that the process is already tainted by these actions of busing people, as happened in Bulawayo.
The consultation for Bulawayo was meant for residents of Bulawayo, not for imported crowds designed to manufacture consent.
Zimbabwe will remain trapped in a permanent crisis if even the most basic democratic processes are manipulated in this way.
English

There are two things that are not going to work, and the sooner people realise that, the better for all of us. They are:
1. Accusing Chamisa of being bribed by ZANU PF without tangible evidence to support such allegations. Such claims may occupy us on Twitter, but the ordinary person has no time for them.
2. Gaslighting the anti‑2030ists because of truly questionable political decisions they made in the past. The middle class sees in them at least a pushback against 2030 that is not coming from other quarters.
Zimbabweans are living in different bubbles, and each believes that their immediate environment is all there is to consider. That’s self‑deception, and that’s our current problem.
What we need now is leadership — not a single person — that unites these two classes, because both are opposed to ZANU PF and to its many unruly and unworthy shenanigans. Such leadership must also reach out to the disgruntled within ZANU PF, including war veterans and the army. Those are also truly opposed to the current ZANU PF. That is what will give us a breakthrough.
The idea that we must, through divisive and invective language, win debates in pubs and on social media is what has emboldened ZANU PF to continue on its ruinous path. “Throw them a bone and they’ll maul each other to death”. If we stay in that cocoon, we are guaranteed to die in our situation.
Don’t be misled by the illusion of perspective.

English

@MladBlanco @kiko8898 @xyezerr Klopp reached 2 ucls final and won 1. He's better than Klopp. Pep used money.
English

@TouchlineX Is that what you call clear offside? Im clearly seeing Barca player's shoulder ahead
English

@Vaibhav10145042 @WolfRMFC Go and sell him yourself cultist. It's possible to love both Vini and Mbappe
English

@Welisville Keep crying Vini cultist. Why are you explaining? Who asked you? If its common knowledge why then explaining? Thank God we have eyes Vini isn't even half player Bale was
English

@RmadridElRey 😂 It nolonger suit the agenda. These really think someone who can't score 30 goals can be the face of the club
English

No one is using Luis Enrique’s quote anymore 😂😂😂😂
𝓡𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪@qsleyy
Mbappe 43 G/A Vinicius 22G/A Valverde -19G/A Arda Guler -17 G/A Jude- 10G/A
English

@Anna_96_10 Where was this previous matches? If Mbappe plays and score you cry. If Mbappe doesn't play you still cry. Can't we love all our players the same?
English
ZIM MADRIDSTAS retweetledi

So why are Zanu PF members allowed to meet and plan around Constitutional Amendment Bill 3 and yet those opposed to it are arrested, have their meetings banned and today - get badly beaten up?
What a farce!
𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐙𝐖@CrimeWatchZW
Today, ZANU PF held a session with all its PCC members across the country. Some members from the 10 provinces joined the session virtually. The purpose of the meeting was to train and equip them with information on how to communicate Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to the people they lead. The bill seeks to extend President Mnangagwa’s term beyond 2030. It is truly sad that opposition members are not being given the same opportunity to engage with the public and share their views on the proposed bill.
English

@daddyhope @realDonaldTrump it's time to make Zimbabwe great again
English

Armed men accompanied by the Zimbabwean police forced their way into the offices of Prof Lovemore Madhuku’s political party, violently interrupting a meeting and attacking several participants, among them the constitutional lawyer, Prof Lovemore Madhuku.
This attack is deeply troubling for Zimbabwe as it reflects a dangerous erosion of democratic space and shows that even lawful constitutional engagement is no longer safe from intimidation and violence.
When armed individuals can storm a civic and political meeting with apparent impunity, it casts serious doubt on the state of the rule of law and the security of citizens exercising their constitutional rights.
Prof Madhuku is opposed to Constitutional Amendment No. 3, which seeks to extend President Mnangagwa’s term of office and change the presidential term from five to seven years. He has an active case before the Constitutional Court challenging this process.
Targeting him, as the state has now effectively done, sends a deeply disturbing message that this amendment will not be handled through open, democratic engagement where citizens are free to oppose or support it without fear.
When a constitutional lawyer with a matter before the highest court is assaulted and intimidated, it undermines the integrity of the judicial process itself. It shows that power is being asserted through coercion rather than constitutionalism.
Instead of allowing robust debate and lawful challenge, the authorities appear to be repeating the very mistakes that have, in the past, drawn damaging international scrutiny and weakened the country’s global standing.
Heavy handed tactics do not silence controversy, they amplify it. If this process continues in this manner, it will inevitably attract serious international attention and further erode confidence in Zimbabwe’s commitment to the rule of law and democratic governance.
These violent attacks even make it difficult for those who were supporting the amendment to continue doing so publicly, because they expose the reality that this process is not being advanced on the basis of legal principle or genuine constitutional reform.
Instead, it increasingly appears to be driven by intimidation, violence and repression aimed at forcing citizens into submission without honest, open debate.
When support for a constitutional amendment must be sustained through fear rather than persuasion, the legitimacy of that amendment is already compromised. A constitutional change of this magnitude should stand on the strength of its arguments, not on the silencing of critics.
Resorting to coercion does not strengthen the case for reform, it weakens it and deepens national division. If a constitution must be amended at gunpoint, then it is no longer reform, it is a declaration that power fears the very people it claims to represent. You don’t win hearts and minds through violence, you do so through engagement!
English


@mrmind97 @marymadridista_ Well, you had to play the greatest Haram Ball ever to qualify that night 😂
English

@WolfRMFC Story for later why are we being dominated by Benfica in Santiago
English

Why didn’t VAR check this against the Benfica number 17??? Why did they check it against the number 44?

Madrid Xtra@MadridXtra
🚨 VAR: OFFSIDE.
English

@_Wangster @aarbeloa17 His defensive contributions is underrated
English


















