Mrs.G Comics

Sneak peek into Lady Hootler #2... Seems Gianna has a close encounter with Voss again, but this time out of her Lady Hootler costume. BTW, we are almost at the pages where LORD TITLER appears. I shouldn't be so excited about this, LOL

@ArtofCShelton I see... Maybe if some of the panels are interesting, I can put them on the copyright page, or maybe at the end, simply as illustrations. Will look into that.

@mrsgcomics See I was thinking like a bonus feature of movies.

OK, did some editing, and it seems I'm cutting four pages off of Cougars' Den. Don't worry, nothing good or important will be cut off. Just streamlined the storytelling, I feel it is much better now.

@ArtofCShelton Not worth it really. If they were valuable I would leave them in.

@mrsgcomics Well it gives something g for a bonus book.

@nxtwrtr You mean about the filters? I think I will prefer not to add them... Hope I won't have issues with Amazon.

@mrsgcomics Ce n'est pas un manga japonais, lol.

Continuing editing work on Cougars' Den. Here is another sneak peek... Still not sure if I will use mosaic filters or not.

@MirandaW0lf2355 thanks!

@mrsgcomics Very sexy Mrs. G 🌹.

No, no, it is not personal at all. I'm working with different artists on different comics. On this one, I'm working with Christian Culicelli for the art, and P.R.Soliver for the colors. I'm the author - I'm doing the writing, lettering, and also in lot of cases the thumbnails (which specify to the artist more precisely what I want). Aside from them, I'm currently actively also working with Patrick O'Donnell and Ric Milk. But I'm also working with several other artists and colorists. So, depending on the time, I'm working with 4-8 artists at once, but on different comics.

@mrsgcomics salut bon travail , une question ci je peux me permettre vous êtes combien dans la ou les créations des comics , ci cela te dérange pas ? ci trop personnel pas obliger de répondre ! ça fait un bout de temps que tu réponds plut j'ai fait quelque choses de mal ou mon qi ait bas !

@TMMackz I won't answer the first question, but from what I've seen it looks great!

How foolish is it to go big, to spend years and pour nearly incalculable and precious resources into the very first comic I’ve ever helped make? Don’t answer that. It doesn’t matter. Practicality is the enemy of imagination.

Art: Christian Culicelli, Colors: P.R.Soliver

@StrangePages physically, that is

@StrangePages Well, I do self-inserts, so you better like me as a creator, before you read my comics!

You don’t have to agree with everything a creator says or believes in order to enjoy their creation.

It seems you are pointing in the right direction there - when people say they like Marxism, they usually don't talk about the theory about where the value comes from , but most probably they just like the conclusions. When I was reading, I had a feeling that even Marx started with the conclusions - workers "should" have better lives given how much value is created in the factories , but (especially in his time) they are working/living in a very bad conditions. So, it seemed he was working to a idea he had - if "workers owned the means of production", then everything will be great! So, let's now prove that economically it makes sense that they SHOULD own them. Which is fine, if the theory fits the reality, but if it doesn't - instead of fixing problems, you are just creating new ones, even bigger ones. Most communist countries didn't even get to try the idea of workers owning the means of production, on the "way to it" they got stuck being ruled top-down by one person, without any democracy, and quickly showed that yes - workers can get even poorer and work even worse than in the early liberal capitalism, with the ruling class actually ended owning "means of production" and even worse than in normal ownership, they are not very motivated to make the factories run good and produce good product. This ruling class had sufficient amounts of whatever they wanted, even if the economy became worse and worse. Former Yugoslavia, was the only country that I know of, where the idea of workers in the factory owning the factory was tried, it was much better than your usual communist country , but eventually each factory got it's own "ruler" (usually the CEO), which had enough effective power to do what they want, and in all cases they ended up putting their own private interest before the interest of the workers. In addition - when you don't have private property, the ruling class can just open new factories by a decree, basically copying what they saw in western societies. Oh - western societies are creating computers now? Let's make factory for computers. They make new product A - let's make our factory for product A. It worked for a while, but eventually ended up in the situation where there wasn't enough work, so, they had to get back to allow for companies with normal "ownership", and finally the state companies had to either restructure under private ownership in best case, or were totally worthless by the end of it. Sorry for the long text, but all this is to say - that yes, while the workers in the "western" type capitalism as we know it used to live quite well, the natural development seems to push not to better, but to worse conditions for the regular worker, where most of us might end up without work (hence poor.) The distinction is though that those capitalistic societies - DO PRODUCE value , and when you have value - it is relatively easy to redistribute it through social programs - either dividends like you say, or guaranteed minimal income or something alike. But trying to reshape the whole market/society on a bad economic theory which doesn't fit the world, and which we saw again and again ends up in poverty because it ends up NOT PRODUCING VALUE is definitely not the solution. I'm so sorry for this block of text, lol.

The only aspect I’m unsure about is how we will maintain stable societies if and when work becomes optional. In some ways, and in some parts of the world, we are already there. My biggest concern is how people and populations react to losing meaning and purpose. It can be destabilizing. And if there’s no hope for better meaning and purpose, it can cause people to lose hope. Teaching people to create their own meaning and purpose seems like part of the solution, but more often than not, we only teach them how to become part of the machine. It probably borders on Marxism to think that we should get paid for our data and for feeding AI, but to me, it seems like part of the solution or at least a stop gap. In Alaska, the state pays citizens a few thousand a year for oil dividends. But how slippery can the slope be before we start sliding into Marxism? From the machine: Each year, part of the fund’s investment earnings is paid out to residents as the Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD). •You have to be a resident of Alaska •You apply once a year •The amount changes yearly (often around $1,000–$2,000 per person, sometimes more) So essentially: the state invests shared resource wealth → earns returns → distributes a slice equally to residents.

Jusqu'à ce jour, les marxistes sont incapables de donner une réponse satisfaisante à ce genre de meme. C'est dire la nullité de leur pensée économique. La valeur n'est pas dans le bien ni dans l'effort fourni pour le produire. Elle est dans l'esprit de celui qui désire ce bien pour résoudre un besoin individuel. La valeur est donc subjective, marginale, contextuelle. Elle n'est pas objective, mesurable, mathématisable. Ainsi s'écrase lamentablement la théorie marxiste de la valeur travail et les théories classiques de la valeur objective. Si ces théories ont réussi à survivre jusqu'à aujourd'hui, c'est uniquement parce qu'elle donne une caution scientifique à l'interventionnisme étatique, rien d'autre.

@RyuNovels No need to be sorry, it is a nice compliment :)

@mrsgcomics My bad, sorry😆

@RyuNovels Thank you! Though a bit too old and a bit too married to be a "miss" :)

@mrsgcomics Looking Good, Miss😎❤️

@StanLibuda74587 Oh, the music seems to follow a same pattern. Are there some similarities in the lyrics too? (Or am I completely missing the point, lol)

@mrsgcomics You may not believe me, but I was hearing the perfect song and then your tweet showed up. This Tweet makes absolutely no sense if you don't have my mindset..... where was I... I .... ähm.... 🤔 youtube.com/watch?v=J8GI2k…

You should never tell people what they should do. Joking aside, but almost always when I see someone posting "you should" post on X, for some reason I'm thinking low IQ.

@_RTGT_ @VLolosOfficiel @KYrifle606 amazing!

@VLolosOfficiel @KYrifle606 That’s my mentality too

this is one of my caricatures that cracks me up man XD so MAD! XD