
If Charlie Kirk hadn't been removed, Trump would have forced Bibi to accept the conclusion (US doctrine from June, '25-Feb 28, '26) that "Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” No war with Iran. No needless death. No closed strait. No diminishment of American power. No freaked out, damaged, resentful allies. No needless threats to the Petrodollar. No revealed limitations of US Naval power. No obscene spikes in global energy. No discussions of nuclear annihilation. No more gratuitous humiliations. Trump could then have focused on implementing the domestic, American-focused agenda for which he'd been elected. And for which he had a golden mandate. Trump could have rallied the feckless House, dominated the pathetic Senate, forced the entire GOP to adhere to the will of the voters who sent them there. He could have codified into law all of the Executive Orders he'd signed with such dramatic fanfare...now destined for certain reversal in January '29. The Left would still be demoralized, directionless, and broke. The illusion of American sovereignty would have been maintained. So, too, Trump's focus, acuity, and fealty. Prosperity, security, and optimism would be on the upswing. National pride too. The GOP would be unified. Its rationale wouldn't be in question. Neither would Turning Point's. Talk of impeachment, revolt, and revolution would be still be confined to the Left. JD Vance would be the undisputed frontrunner for '28. Charlie Kirk would be the next governor of Arizona. Or JD's running mate. Old Aunt Lindsey would be off Fox, off to retirement, maybe even out of the closet. Thomas Massie would have been reelected yesterday, with at least 74% of the vote. @anyaparampil

