MSM Monitor

During the 2024 general election Anas Sarwar pledged "tens of billions of pounds" of investment for grid infrastructure in Scotland that would see fifty years of upgrade in just six years. It really is time the BBC challenged this charlatan on his election promises given he made most of them on BBC programmes.

So, Johanna Baxter doesn't think her constituents deserve to know what questions she asked Andy Burnham and what her wider concerns are? Despite her own concerns she has already given her full backing to Burnham? Who exactly is Baxter representing aside from herself?

Johanna Baxter "I'm a party loyalist. I didn't spend ten years on of my life on the party's governing body for nothing." "Andy will have my full support ... We have a stable government." Won't reveal what she asked Burnham at private hustings and doesn't think an election is required. House Jock.

Do the English media just ask every Scottish person if they will be supporting England. Fucks sake 😂

They'd reserve the supporting of 'home nations' football teams to Westminster if they could. The Scotland Act would make it illegal not to support the three lions. A Section 30 would be required to support Scotland. Michael Shanks would be Morris Dancing outside Number 10.

We see the BritNat media is once again harassing Scots by demanding to know if they'll be supporting England on Wednesday. We won't be supporting them. We never have done. Golf, boxing etc, no problem but football is different. We'll be cheering on Argentina. What if England win and then win the final? Good luck to them. We'll move on. It's only a football match. Will the BritNat media move on? We suspect not, and that's what concerns a lot of people. We'll be forced fed their triumphalism for decades.

The BBC is indulging the wild conspiracy theories of a miniscule number of angry Yessers some of whom have shown worrying behavioural traits. What these vindictive narcissists will do when nothing comes of their complaints and the BritNat media tires of them is what concerns us.

History will show the end of the Union was inevitable when the BBC began hurling sh*te into the face of a hurricane.

Imagine duping readers of your own paper by using an image of Peter Murrell on a story about Yes Scotland funds.

BBC BritNat managed to cram four different video clips of Nicola Sturgeon with Peter Murrell this morning on Reporting Scotland. The station continues to try to link an innocent woman to her former husband's crime. Sleazy, tabloid trash journalism.

Does anyone seriously believe these papers are worth saving? What, aside from relentless smears, innuendo and half-truths aimed at damaging the SNP do they bring to Scottish society? Where will all the hacks go when there's nothing left? Perpetual BBC guest appearances?

Is there a sadder sight in Scottish journalism than the demise of The Herald? Reduced to making snarky comments about Nicola Sturgeon's clothes. The paper must be nearing the end. The hard copy will disappear within a decade.

At a time when the safety of former high-profile politicians is the number one issue of the day BBC BritNat continues to portray Nicola Sturgeon as someone who has evaded justice. This station is as cheap & tawdry as it is third rate.

This is the top story on BBC BritNat today. The station will never get over the fact Nicola Sturgeon was cleared. Moreover, its relentless attempt to run a 'trial by media' had zero impact on the public. The former FM will live rent free in the heads of BritNats for years.

The BBC is so swamped with adverts now - mostly for its own programmes - that they may as well scrap the TV licence and fund the thing through advertising.

Paul Sweeney "Every year Scotland has a net benefit of £10bn of a fiscal transfer ... London essentially generates the wealth and it's redistributed to other regions of the UK."

In 2019 Paul Sweeney stated that if a Holyrood election returned a majority of MSPs from parties that stood on a clear Indyref2 platform, it would constitute a "decisive mandate" for a second Indyref. According to @PaulJSweeney, there is now a decisive mandate for Indyref2.