johnmureithi

1.1K posts

johnmureithi banner
johnmureithi

johnmureithi

@mureithijohn6

MBChB,FCS-ECSA(General Surgery)

Embu, Kenya Katılım Temmuz 2017
728 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
johnmureithi retweetledi
JUNE TUITOEK
JUNE TUITOEK@TuitoekJune·
What the medical fraternity could not do, the Blood of Jesus has done. #TopDrRespondsToKEMRI
JUNE TUITOEK tweet media
English
1
46
73
1.9K
Chris
Chris@ChrisMidamba·
This is exactly how the Pharisees operated. They engaged Jesus publicly, then rewrote the narrative privately to poison the crowd.
English
4
9
13
569
Chris
Chris@ChrisMidamba·
Thread! In the time of Jesus, the Pharisees didn’t deny His power. They interviewed Him, observed Him, then twisted the story to protect their narrative. Same spirit. Different century.
English
19
64
107
1.9K
johnmureithi
johnmureithi@mureithijohn6·
@ArthurPstr @DanChepta @anne_odida There someone behind all this wicked schemes. Very soon it will be known after they get hungry again and their viewership goes back to baseline
English
1
0
0
37
Arthur
Arthur@ArthurPstr·
@DanChepta Ati @anne_odida and Samira go to Laikipia, finds out that Peter Oyani is for sure Healed of HIV Then come to the one who has healed Peter to get full information, then after confessing that Peter is healed, that person 'bribes' them not to air? HOW NOW🤔
English
3
4
8
296
johnmureithi
johnmureithi@mureithijohn6·
@DanChepta Why didn't they reject the same day they were being offered? Why did they give their MPESA numbers? Why did they wait for 9 full days to refund the money? Don't you smell a rat here? Sisi so wajinga #HIVHealedMustWatch
English
1
1
4
135
Robert ALAI, HSC
Robert ALAI, HSC@RobertAlai·
He believes that Gen-Z thinks he is a fake prophet. He is trying to bribe them with fake prophesies and imaginations. Odiangabuk!
Robert ALAI, HSC tweet media
English
36
23
211
20.6K
johnmureithi
johnmureithi@mureithijohn6·
Thank you so much Dr Wesaya for this. I was shocked to see that TV47 played to the public gallery to get views and clout. However,it should remain ever so clear that Peter Oyan was HIV Positive even with very low CD4 Count,taking ARVs and attending clinics for reviews and drug refills. We are learned. We know that we are saying! #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV
Dr. Tommy Wesaya Temesi@TTemesi80614

In the cases of Rebecca Mose and Peter Oyan, critical facts were quietly acknowledged yet never confronted. Take Rebecca Mose. It was not disputed that she was born HIV positive to an HIV-positive mother. It was not disputed that she was enrolled in care at AMPATH. It was not disputed that she later tested HIV negative. More importantly, it was not disputed that senior AMPATH professors convened, reviewed her case, and confirmed her HIV-negative status. Those are not media claims. They are verified and established medical facts. What was carefully avoided is the ethical question that follows: If a patient is repeatedly confirmed HIV negative by specialists, should she remain on lifelong ARVs? Would that not constitute maleficence—causing harm through unnecessary treatment? ARVs are not vitamins. They carry metabolic, hepatic, renal, and long-term systemic effects. Continuing them in a confirmed HIV-negative patient violates basic principles of clinical ethics. TV47 argues she should not have been removed from care by NASCOP or any authority. But medicine is not governed by sentiment or fear—it is governed by current evidence. When evidence changes, care must change. Ignoring facts is not professionalism; it is a deliberate attempt [a futile one] to mislead the public and silence what JESUS has done. #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV youtube.com/live/R8efzMPqZ…

English
2
47
83
3.6K
johnmureithi
johnmureithi@mureithijohn6·
A question of logic, medicine, and credibility The current media alleges that the Church falsified medical reports from two separate institutions—first a reported HIV positive result, then a subsequent negative result. This claim deserves careful scrutiny. From a medical and logical standpoint, the allegation raises a fundamental question: what is the logic of falsifying a negative result? In clinical practice, a negative HIV result is the most common outcome of routine testing. It carries no shock value, no advantage, and no incentive for fabrication. If an individual was never HIV positive to begin with, there is no rational, medical, or strategic reason to manufacture a negative report. One does not falsify what is already the expected norm. Furthermore, HIV testing is governed by documented algorithms, serial testing, quality assurance processes, and traceable laboratory systems. Reports are not casual pieces of paper; they are products of regulated medical workflows. Any claim of falsification must therefore be backed by concrete evidence—not assumptions, insinuations, or emotional storytelling. Medicine is anchored in evidence, timelines, and repeatability. Logic is anchored in cause and effect. When a narrative fails both tests, it is no longer investigative—it becomes speculative. This matter should be discussed with scientific sobriety, respect for medical processes, and intellectual honesty toward the public. Kenyans deserve clarity, not confusion built on illogical premises. Truth does not fear examination—but neither should reason be suspended in the process. youtube.com/watch?v=R8efzM… #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV
YouTube video
YouTube
English
151
361
408
21.4K
🅴🆁🅸🅲 🅾🅱🅸🅴🆁🅾
@mureithijohn6 The allegation is now trying to make us believe that: • two medical institutions • regulated labs • documented testing algorithms all colluded to falsify results, without evidence. That’s not journalism. That’s conjecture.
English
3
8
13
295
johnmureithi retweetledi
Jafred Juma@doc opthalmologist
Jafred Juma@doc opthalmologist@PastorJafred·
@mureithijohn6 #BloodOfJesusHealsHiv You can't hide the truth forever the so called media houses. Where will you run to when finally your wrong catches up with you?? It's a matter of time but unless you repent and turn away from this wicked behavior. Don't allow the enemy to use you
English
1
29
42
813
johnmureithi retweetledi
JKUAT RHSF
JKUAT RHSF@Repentjkuat·
Where do media Get Guts to even attempt to allege a thing which can be systematically handled by the investigative Government agencies. And rush to air Fake News. Which one is easier, Healing HIV or celebrating this already well established Miracle of #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV ??
johnmureithi@mureithijohn6

A question of logic, medicine, and credibility The current media alleges that the Church falsified medical reports from two separate institutions—first a reported HIV positive result, then a subsequent negative result. This claim deserves careful scrutiny. From a medical and logical standpoint, the allegation raises a fundamental question: what is the logic of falsifying a negative result? In clinical practice, a negative HIV result is the most common outcome of routine testing. It carries no shock value, no advantage, and no incentive for fabrication. If an individual was never HIV positive to begin with, there is no rational, medical, or strategic reason to manufacture a negative report. One does not falsify what is already the expected norm. Furthermore, HIV testing is governed by documented algorithms, serial testing, quality assurance processes, and traceable laboratory systems. Reports are not casual pieces of paper; they are products of regulated medical workflows. Any claim of falsification must therefore be backed by concrete evidence—not assumptions, insinuations, or emotional storytelling. Medicine is anchored in evidence, timelines, and repeatability. Logic is anchored in cause and effect. When a narrative fails both tests, it is no longer investigative—it becomes speculative. This matter should be discussed with scientific sobriety, respect for medical processes, and intellectual honesty toward the public. Kenyans deserve clarity, not confusion built on illogical premises. Truth does not fear examination—but neither should reason be suspended in the process. youtube.com/watch?v=R8efzM… #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV

English
2
17
24
649
Ndong@Conslaw
Ndong@Conslaw@Ndonglaw043·
Ndugu Joshua, my point is simple because I was present. If you visit me for an interview at 3pm & by 7pm wer are to be done, for some reason there are delays till 30 minutes past midnight. I decide to facilitate all in the crew, not one or just a few. Openly you ask, are you comfortable for us to bless you for staying late or you're uncomfortable. You agree. Not out of coercion or in some hiding. In the hearing of all. Then you emerge 9 days later, return the money & then you don't also display the response after return. But more fundamentally, who sends money to influence via MPESA?
English
8
3
13
3.8K
Joshua Malidzo Nyawa
Joshua Malidzo Nyawa@joshuamalidzo·
Is @Ndonglaw043 saying that person X can 'oil the hands' of investigative journalists due to his kindness? At a time when the Investigative journalists are conducting investigations into your affairs? Wueh 🤣
English
11
14
74
19.3K
johnmureithi
johnmureithi@mureithijohn6·
@DrJuma_M But they are the ones who gave their numbers? Why didn't they declined?
English
0
0
1
397
Heisenberg
Heisenberg@DrJuma_M·
CONFIRMED:Kenyans are waking up at an Alarming speed,Its Boiling everywhere.
Heisenberg tweet media
English
14
70
257
9.6K