

johnmureithi
1.1K posts

@mureithijohn6
MBChB,FCS-ECSA(General Surgery)









I get invited by other countries to address their Parliament and Senate. That has never happened in Kenya - Prophet Owuor

In the cases of Rebecca Mose and Peter Oyan, critical facts were quietly acknowledged yet never confronted. Take Rebecca Mose. It was not disputed that she was born HIV positive to an HIV-positive mother. It was not disputed that she was enrolled in care at AMPATH. It was not disputed that she later tested HIV negative. More importantly, it was not disputed that senior AMPATH professors convened, reviewed her case, and confirmed her HIV-negative status. Those are not media claims. They are verified and established medical facts. What was carefully avoided is the ethical question that follows: If a patient is repeatedly confirmed HIV negative by specialists, should she remain on lifelong ARVs? Would that not constitute maleficence—causing harm through unnecessary treatment? ARVs are not vitamins. They carry metabolic, hepatic, renal, and long-term systemic effects. Continuing them in a confirmed HIV-negative patient violates basic principles of clinical ethics. TV47 argues she should not have been removed from care by NASCOP or any authority. But medicine is not governed by sentiment or fear—it is governed by current evidence. When evidence changes, care must change. Ignoring facts is not professionalism; it is a deliberate attempt [a futile one] to mislead the public and silence what JESUS has done. #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV youtube.com/live/R8efzMPqZ…










A question of logic, medicine, and credibility The current media alleges that the Church falsified medical reports from two separate institutions—first a reported HIV positive result, then a subsequent negative result. This claim deserves careful scrutiny. From a medical and logical standpoint, the allegation raises a fundamental question: what is the logic of falsifying a negative result? In clinical practice, a negative HIV result is the most common outcome of routine testing. It carries no shock value, no advantage, and no incentive for fabrication. If an individual was never HIV positive to begin with, there is no rational, medical, or strategic reason to manufacture a negative report. One does not falsify what is already the expected norm. Furthermore, HIV testing is governed by documented algorithms, serial testing, quality assurance processes, and traceable laboratory systems. Reports are not casual pieces of paper; they are products of regulated medical workflows. Any claim of falsification must therefore be backed by concrete evidence—not assumptions, insinuations, or emotional storytelling. Medicine is anchored in evidence, timelines, and repeatability. Logic is anchored in cause and effect. When a narrative fails both tests, it is no longer investigative—it becomes speculative. This matter should be discussed with scientific sobriety, respect for medical processes, and intellectual honesty toward the public. Kenyans deserve clarity, not confusion built on illogical premises. Truth does not fear examination—but neither should reason be suspended in the process. youtube.com/watch?v=R8efzM… #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV




