@cityofschvartz I think I get the concept, any of these inflection points in particular?
English
Max
25K posts
@mxwfx depends on what they like/dislike about the city. personally would focus on 1) food, 2) cultural institutions(museums, theaters), 3) lifestyle (beach, mountains) and this ones a bit woowoo: 4) the innumerable textures of built and social environments in this city
English
Max retweetledi
Speaking of magazine economics, @pinkomagazine is gearing up to raise $ to print our next issue by fall. If you are a fan or a rich person or know how to do “development” please dont be shy, my dms are open
English
Actually this is great because ive needed to log back in and dust off my algorithm for when the @pinkomagazine campaign starts soon
English
Max retweetledi
an important screening tonight at the Roxie by my comrades & friends at Canyon Cinema: a rare screening of Revolution Until Victory by SF Newsreel (a film later distributed by Single Spark under the name We Are the Palestinian People) & San Francisco State: On Strike, on 16mm.
English
Max retweetledi
"‘Genocide has two phases’: The first involves the ‘destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group’ – this was achieved in Gaza by Israel’s devastating bombing. The second involves the imposition of a design by the oppressor, like these reconstruction plans for Gaza."
eyal weizman@weizman_eyal
On architecture as the continuation of genocide by other means… lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/…
English
Max retweetledi
Max retweetledi
The war isn’t about nuclear enrichment and won’t end because of a diplomatic breakthrough on nuclear enrichment, even if its start was sold in those terms and its end is sold in those terms
Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش@citrinowicz
The nuclear file, may be more tractable than it appears, provided there is political will on both sides. In practice, Iran is not currently enriching, and the United States has already shown a degree of implicit recognition of Iran’s right to enrich under certain constraints. A workable compromise is therefore within reach. Washington would formally acknowledge Iran’s right to limited enrichment, while Tehran would agree to a time-bound freeze on enrichment activities as it rebuilds its nuclear infrastructure. This freeze would not extend for decades, but rather for a defined period of several years, during which enrichment levels and stockpiles would remain minimal and subject to intrusive monitoring. In parallel, Iran would dilute part of its existing enriched uranium stockpile, and in return receive meaningful sanctions relief. Such an arrangement would not require a fundamental breakthrough, only mutual recognition of constraints. The United States must accept that without acknowledging Iran’s right to enrich, no agreement will move forward. Iran, for its part, must recognize that such acknowledgment comes with temporary but real limitations on its program. This is not unprecedented. The backchannel talks between U.S. officials and Iranian representatives in Oman in 2012 lead to a breakthrough only when U.S recognized Iranian enrichment rights. The path forward is therefore less about technical barriers and more about political willingness to accept a narrow but viable middle ground. #IranWar
English