MyJournalWhisp

I tried the supplements from TWC (twc.health/products/ultim…) and donated blood twice. Initially, my levels dropped from 14,000 to 12,500, but then they went back up. Although it hasn’t affected me as severely as many others in the comments, the most noticeable effect is exercise intolerance and fatigue. I run out of breath and lose power during gym exercises, especially sprints, which I never struggled with before. Has anyone managed to stop the body from continuing to produce these spike proteins? It definitely doesn’t seem normal for the body to still be producing this many antibodies 5–6 years later.

My spike protein levels are still at around 12500 u/ml after almost 5 years of vaccination. None of these so called protocols have moved the needle at all. Many severe patients showcase high elevated spike protein levels. Inmodia Lab in Germany is doing great work with testing.

@jtrader Straight to the point! Excellent article!

@mert Good comparison. I always asked Claude to consult Codex through MCP. Codex always found bugs and Claude always agreed with Codex. Finally, I gave up on Claude and now I use only Codex.

it is insane how far behind opus 4.6 max has fallen behind codex 5.4 xhigh it's not close one is like talking to a coked out intern who hasn't slept in 40 hours taking every shortcut known to man and the other is a prime rigorous mathematician with a German bedside manner

@jtrader @AnthropicAI @openclaw Keep us posted on how it's going.

Crazy that @AnthropicAI banned @openclaw I love Claude, but yeah… this one stings. Feels like the natural next move is going fully independent running local models and building your own stack. I’m starting with Google Gemma 4 on my own machine. Game on.

@ZenomTrader @tradingview How do you prevent Lookahead Bias and Repainting in tradingview strategies ? I switched to my custom backtest in phyton for accuracy

Crazy that Claude can now autonomously code strategies and validate them on @tradingview and it’s actually faster than my pipeline. Time to expand to a third platform for our code TradingView is next. 15+ strategies are waiting to be coded. And a full Meta EA TV version is coming. Probably only 0.001% of the industry is doing this. Huge thanks to @Tradesdontlie and @DailyProfilerCo for this pipeline idea.

@Abomination81 Nice job, man! Really different than the 1,000 posts with my bot that made me a million overnight on Polymarket. Do you trade the 5-minute up or down as well?

Just finished creating a new frontend for my bots. Love to see the ones you guys created (placeholder data, just polishing it up)

@Gustafssonkotte I like your idea of splitting into multiple 1h. Price to beat of current window is previous window final price. You can get it from BTC chainlink or web fetch for previous window ;)

@Abombination81 How do you get “Price to Beat “ from polymarket on BTC up or down ?

There is 1 strategy that dominates the leaderboards. Every top bot in crypto is doing this strategy. Here's exactly how it's done- warning... its long. Market Makers, Ladder Bot, Merge Bot... various names for the same strategy. @0xde17f7144fbd0eddb2679132c10ff5e74b120988-1772205225932" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/@0xde17f7144fb… They are easy to spot. Massive PNL, thousands of trades. Prices all over the place, in whole and fractional numbers. Usually multiple markets. So how does it work. This is conceptually a bit difficult, so stick with me. First, they are bidding on every single token, up and down, at 1c increments pre window. Ie 45c, 46c, 47c etc. Both directions. So the entire possible bid is covered. When someone sells at that price, they immediately put another bid up. They are providing liquidity. They buy hundreds and hundreds of times per window. and use a tool called merge. You can merge any up/down pair at any time on Polymarket for 1$. This immediately removes the pair and returns 1$. So if you have a 70c up and a 28c down, you get 1$ for your 98c. But this isnt how they make money, they actually lose on the merges, so a down at 70, an up at 32... merged loses 2c. But it gets rid of shares and frees up capitol. --------------- Now the conceptual part --------------- Assume a price has moved to 70c, and the other price is 31c. They are placing bids at every level below those prices... ie 69.68.67.....5,4,3,2,1 on the 70 side. They are also placing bids at every level below 31c, ie 30,29,28,27.....3,2,1 As you can see they have MANY more bids available to buy on the 70 side than the 32. Which means that they are accumulating more winning shares. And as they buy both, they merge.. now the merge removes a losing share for 1-2c and a winning share. But because naturally the winning side goes up, you are getting more shares. Meaning you can merge all your losing shares out, leaving you with just winning shares. So as the price gets even higher, say 95c, they have gtc buys at 94,93,92,91... 3,2,1 etc. And gtc buys on the losing side 5c, 4c, 321. So just with math... they are going to buy many more Winners than Losers. And each loser they do buy, gets merged out with a winner. So at window close they are holding thousands of winners they bought anywhere from 50c to 99c, and zero losers. The loser merges cost them money, but the winners are making them 35c a share (average merged cost) and the losers lost them 2.8c a share (merged loser cost). So youre left with a net profit of roughly 32c a share. Times thousands of shares, every 5m,15m window. Now the hard stuff. 1. The bids are filled first in first out. So if I place my ladder before you, I get filled you dont. The window opens 24hr before the actual window start (this is all crypto windows). So the battle for Los Angeles is at THE EXACT moment the window opens. Whomever can place their 100 orders first, wins. 2. Money, this shit is expensive. Takes a minimum of about $1000 usd to test per window. And you cant just test once and change, you need to test 5-6x to see if its working. 3. Slow, each change you have to wait 24hr to test again. 4. Untestable. Since its all fills against buyers. You cannot backtest this. You learn by doing. 5. the ladder isnt 1:1, you arent placing 1 share at each level, its a quadriatic "ish" curve. Ie more shares where its more likely to be at. THIS is the magic formula that takes money to test and is very difficult to get right. 6. Latency. The fight is for that first micro second to place the bids. Me and probably 25 others are fighting for that 1/25,000th of a second. You win some, you lose some. 7. Reversals. Overall your wr is very high, because youre basically DCA'ing in the entire time, BUT every once in awhile the trend reverses last second... and youre left holding 30,000 up shares naked... and it flips down. Those days... are fun. So thats it. The entire pickle. I HIGHLY recommend you avoid this strategy. It took me $50,000 to figure it out over a month. This should be the holy grail you attempt after you have a minimum of 100 profitable bots. If you read all this reply with - Green. Testing if this long format breakdown is worth it or if its better to do short snippets

@mkurman88 I switched from Claude to Codex. Claude made a lot of assumptions without verifying. Codex, on the other hand, always checks before giving an answer. When I asked Claude to consult Codex before deciding, Codex always had something to add to fix Claude’s decisions.

I just canceled my Claude subscription. It couldn't resolve a straightforward issue for 3 hours, even though I pointed out several times where the bug lies (I was afk, so I couldn't do it by myself, but that's not the point). I asked Codex to fix it -> 1 minute and done. I asked Codex to review other things Claude made - with GSD, 20 steps, discussion, plan with research, execution. It has been working since Saturday. And what? Everything was faked. I don't get it...

Emotions make you take profits too early or hesitate to re-enter after a loss. My bot executes strict rules without feelings. I know that overall, at the end of the day, it will print more than it loses.

@dataeyes_ @aw_trades_ I know the answer because I backtest thousands of strategies before deploying live. Here's a golden nugget for backtesting: Tests will take much longer, but this step is crucial for accuracy on 1–5m and even 15m timeframes.

@aw_trades_ You use 1m nq data for backtesting. how do you know the sequence is correct (entry, tp, sl)? As a software engineer(with a master’s degree in cs) do you think this backtest is accurate?

773,000 bars of NQ data. 2+ years of 1-minute candles. Thousands of parameter combinations. I'm running a full systematic backtest of Bloop across every sensitivity, timeframe, TP/SL setting, and session filter. No cherry picked screenshots. No hand picked trades. Just data. Results coming soon :)) This was the quick mode test to validate testing accuracy

I think every trading strategy can be made profitable with the right parameters. Moving from manual watching and executing to thousands of backtests and automatic execution. This is the future.

@traderkane If you want to build things, use GPT-5.3 Codex with Extra High reasoning. IMO it's better than Claude.

As someone who uses AI a lot, like very deep in the trenches, gemini pro fucking sucks

I never wrote a line of code. In less than one month, I built a backtesting system and a real-time trading strategy that makes real money on autopilot while I research the next strategy!

Never in history has it been so easy to turn your edge into an automated trading strategy that doesn't require you to watch the market. In less than 3 weeks I built a system that's making profits consistently on autopilot. Just one idea so far.

@jtrader @perplexity_ai Keep us posted. I have @antigravity with Codex and I've already built complete backtesting strategies and live trading using the Rithmic API. Everything in less than 2 weeks with zero coding knowledge.

I just got the @perplexity_ai Max subscription. Let’s see what all the hype around Perplexity Computer is about. Let the games begin.

@jtrader Check the repaint and lookahead issue with the strategy you are testing (ask Claude). It may give positive results in backtesting but negative results in real trading.

My openclaw is getting better and better. Model designed for NQ 5m chart. OpenClaw → webhook → Topstpex. Every signal executed automatically. Let’s see if the algo can really move the needle 👀

NQ short sellers now

@j_intradaytrade SS

My trading group did 326R last week That’s an average of 24R EACH Haven’t seen any other trading strategy get results like this Comment ‘SS’ and I’ll DM you a video of me going over my exact strategy for free (must be following)

@j_intradaytrade Ss

I got 33.06R in one day yesterday trading a SUPER simple model I recorded a 90 minute live price read going over EXACTLY what I look for, how I find entries and place trades Comment ‘SS’ and I’ll DM it to you for free (must be following)