
Gino
4.4K posts

Gino
@n0ndaba_
Twitter is not a real place
South Africa Katılım Temmuz 2022
557 Takip Edilen159 Takipçiler

@DavidHundeyin We are a founding member of BRICS not just a full member only
English

@sowazis @AdvoBarryRoux @IamMzilikazi He hasn't released the full interview, sadly. Looks like he's focused on driving traffic to channel than telling the story
English

@AdvoBarryRoux Who offered him this money? @IamMzilikazi Please share the link to your podcast
English

@Absolute_Kganki We might need to know why Zungula was removed by JZ then if what Floyd is alleging is true
English

@JojoNqandela Maybe that's the deal Zuma and Ramaphosa would've agreed on on their "tea" meeting, allegedly
English

They want to modernise a country whose population they refuse to educate. Stupid.
News24 🇿🇦@News24
Learner’s licence fail rates soar after radical test changes brnw.ch/21x2kwt
English

@ZwaneOmkhulu Ramaphosa must resign. Not because we hate him but because the whole impeachment process would create an embarrassment for our country. We all know there's no Mustafa who bought buffalo. So Ramaphosa must resign for the sake of us all
English

Sizwe, you can no longer seriously posture as an “independent political analyst” while functioning as a full-time political combatant for a clearly identifiable factional agenda.
For years, critics observed that your commentary almost always bends in one ideological direction: anti-Ramaphosa, sympathetic to the so-called “Radical Economic Transformation” bloc, indulgent toward Zuma-aligned narratives, and relentlessly hostile to institutions whenever outcomes do not favour your preferred side.
Many dismissed those concerns as unfair.
But statements like “President Cyril Ramaphosa must resign” — absent a criminal conviction, absent an impeachment finding, absent any judicial conclusion of constitutional delinquency — expose the shift from analysis to activism.
A serious analyst distinguishes between:
• political dislike,
• legal liability,
• constitutional thresholds, and
• evidentiary standards.
You increasingly collapse all four into factional rhetoric.
What makes this more revealing is the selective outrage. The same circles that now demand immediate resignation spent years rationalising:
• State Capture,
• attacks on the judiciary,
• the hollowing out of SARS, SAPS and the NPA,
• open contempt for commissions of inquiry,
• and systematic institutional vandalism under Zuma.
Now suddenly constitutional morality is discovered.
The irony is profound: Ramaphosa presides over a constitutional order in which courts remain independent, commissions investigate freely, ministers are challenged publicly, and even the President himself is scrutinised daily without fear.
That is not the profile of a captured state.
Your recent commentary no longer reads like detached political analysis. It reads like partisan mobilisation masquerading as intellectual commentary.
At some point, honesty requires dropping the “independent analyst” branding and openly acknowledging the ideological project you consistently advance.
Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh@SizweMpofuWalsh
President Cyril Ramaphosa must resign.
English
Gino retweetledi
Gino retweetledi

By voting on whether prima facie criminal conduct warranted continuation under section 89, Parliament moved beyond constitutional oversight and entered terrain closely resembling adjudication of criminal implications.
A whole constitutional court avoided mentioning such because those judges were just extinguishing a criminal matter into a constitutional error. The Section 89 panel established serious criminal prima facie evidence, not vague ethical concerns. These are not political issues but fall squarely within the domain of criminal law!
CJ repeatedly emphasises that Parliament does not determine “guilt”. But guilt of what exactly?
That is precisely my point. The Independent Panel had already identified prima facie conduct carrying criminal implications. The judgment avoids confronting the deeper question: once Parliament votes on those findings, is it not already engaging, at least indirectly, with questions of criminal culpability?
It does, and an entire Constitutional Court failed to provide clear institutional boundaries or preventative mechanisms against this constitutional blunder. In effect, the judgment says: “redo the same criminal adjudication constitutionally,” without confronting the deeper problem that Parliament was already politically engaging prima facie conduct carrying criminal implications.

English

@Mikedotcoza He has to resign for the sake of the country. Finding out where that money came from could be too much for our fragile democracy
English

@niphomadondo He was once adamant that the price of fuel wouldn't rise. Here we are.
English

@RothLindberg If you've been defeated by a second rate military what does that say about the US military. The US is still living a delusion
English

@KhanyaMsika @Mbatha10 @TshiredoTendani My brother, I think we are missing each other. Do a small experiment when you have time. Sit on a bench behind a bakkie for 2 hours you will see that it's pure torture, and think how 30 hours would feel. Thanks for the conversation
English

@MightiJamie I can already see Honorable Skhosana there grilling Ramaphosa 😂
English

@lebojoycechauke Nix, I did not even wanna go further with the conversation
English

@S_Gwiliza My most disappointing block was by Andile Mgxitama, simply for asking him how their call to ammend s25 would escape the huddles of the Bill of Rights
English

It is not by coincidence that the rich firms appointed Tembeka to move this application.
They knew exactly what they were doing.
Sikhakhane spoke for us all 👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿
Azania@azania1023
Listen to Adv Muzi Skhakhane 🔥🔥🔥 History might judge Tembeka Ngcukaitobi harshly… He is being used by whites stop changes that seeks to treat both black and white law firms equal.
English

@Mokone_Dimphoo My sister, I love your work, but you are wrong on this one. But time will tell
English















