Sta @ Bit192 / Tone Sphere

Starbirth（スターバース） 制作進行中！　9年ぶり新作ゲーム。

@nulltask from tmux to bmux

ごぶさたしてます。誰得なターミナルエミュレータ用 BMS プレイヤーを作ってます。近日公開予定…？

ぬこが水飲んで草が生えてくる置物、何も生えてこないので失敗したかと思ったらオプト先生が生えてきた

今年も某イベントで駅前フラッグが出ます……多分。

>this is one of the first "real deal" decisions we have faced >These are the principles I care most about for this decision: alignment, democratization, empowerment, and individual agency. I am afraid this is not true. OpenAI's classifier-based safeguarding has been failing for many. You just had more than two large incidents where you wrongly banned many accounts from Codex 5.3 in less than 2 months. OpenAI has multiple incidents like this where you threatened or actually closed down enterprise accounts on overzealous, badly designed classifiers (such as "mass weapons", "distillation", "cyber action" and the worst accusation ever possible: "CSAM".) without any human intervention at all. No other major frontier lab had so many incidents like this. Our organization account was also threatened to be kicked out from API access for weapons. We stopped using API after that (OpenAI just sent us an email inquiring why our API usage dropped). I am totally lost how OpenAI are confident about their ability to monitor DoD/DoW's activity at all. Based on OpenAI's track record, it is either you given up all the concerns and let DoD/DoW decide what is acceptable without any guardrail other than maybe what is baked into the model (which we all know that is very easy to bypass - that's why all major labs have additional classifiers to prevent misuse) or DoD/DoW is alright with your misfiring automated classifiers. I see zero chance of the latter. And people like myself is angry, not upset, at you not because you have military contract, but it is rather clear that your statement that "We share the same ethics guidelines with Anthropic" was empirically false given the timing of announcements and the situation, and that you and OpenAI are to any trained eyes willing to be dishonest about the most principle matter while attempting to spin as long as possible.

(I also would like to share this, which I wrote after thinking a little more.) There is a lot we will talk about in the coming days, but since this is one of the first "real deal" decisions we have faced, I wanted to share a few things that have been heavily on my mind the past few days. These are the principles I care most about for this decision: alignment, democratization, empowerment, and individual agency. The democratic process must stay in control, and we must democratize AI. OpenAI should not decide the fate of the world; no private company should. We need to work with governments, but also we need to make sure individuals get increasing power. Things are moving so fast that we need to urgently educate the world so that the democratic process has time to catch up. I think one of our most important strategic decisions ever was the principle of iterative deployment. In particular, the key element required for democracy, such as protection of privacy, must be defended by all of society. I believe that, as some of the creators of this new technology, we deserve to and are obligated to have a loud voice about the risks, pitfalls, and benefits we see. I think we are heading towards a world where the relationship between governments and AI efforts is critical. This will be difficult but it has to happen; I do not see any good future where we don't get there. There should not be games and fights in the press like this; drastic government action should be avoided. I think there are real dangers coming to the world, and maybe pretty soon; I tried to put myself in the mindset of how I'd feel the day after an attack on the US or a new bioweapon we could have helped prevent.

Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.

There is even less friction on Enterprise. For user-facing services built exclusively on OpenAI's pay-as-you-go API, every cloud provider has OpenAI compatible endpoint. You can literally just change URL and done. I don't know how many companies have LT contract with OAI or Azure, but reportedly OAI's shared revenue from Azure is rather minimal. For agentic coding framework, all you need to do is to install other CLI and continue on your repo. There are some model differences, but virtually every model released after Dec 2025 has ability to digest SOUL/AGENT/SKILL etc md files (which was originally made standard by Claude Code). FWIW we stopped using OAI's API a long ago as their whatever classifier threatened to shut down our developer account (was using for data labelling and augmentation) for "weapons". There are a number of similar incidents reported, most of those affected never got any human support in the loop, some of them actually got their API access deactivated for no reason. I just don't think OAI as an enterprise partner is a robust idea especially today's fairly commoditized enterprise AI market, and IMO the crack from lack of transparency/philosophy is slowly showing on the enterprise side as well.

The 295% uninstall metric is headline-grabbing but the more important signal is whether the replacement installs are sticky. Consumer app switching is cheap; enterprise API contract switching is expensive. The question I'm trying to answer is whether the CTO-level conversations are changing — are enterprise AI buyers re-evaluating their primary model provider, or is this a consumer-layer phenomenon that doesn't move enterprise budgets? From conversations with peers managing similar-scale AI deployments, the enterprise renegotiation conversations have started. If they close in Q2, the market share shift becomes structural. If they don't, this is a news cycle bounce, not a platform transition.

BREAKING: ChatGPT continues to lose market share >openai sell out to literal department of war >295% uninstall surge in ONE DAY >1-star reviews up 775% >5-stars down 50% >meanwhile anthropic says “no” >claude downloads up 81% >passes chatgpt in downloads >hits #1 on app store ALTMAN IS FINISHED

#ToneSphere_art ☆

朝弱いけど、起きたら「帝京魂！」か「合宿免許ワォ！！」とハイピッチで叫ぶとすぐ目が覚めて元気が出やすい

東京都のポイントを人生で使ったことのないauポに変えたのでとりあえず……と思って店で 「あうポイントにしてください」 と言ってしまった

家族ぐるみで付き合いのある日本人がグラミーのレッドカーペットに！ と思って写真を見たらしゅごい風貌になっていた

大きな毛並みのアイツに尽くすと決めた　けどあっちはわたしにも世界にも無関心 #カピバる

AIのべりすと初期の頃からずっと、出版社の方から「売れるマンガが作れるAIを作りたいんだけど？」というような質問を受けてきました。集団作業的なメジャーエンタメの工程は、あちこちAIに置き換えが進んでいくのだと思います。 でも真面目な話、エッセイ要素や作者の方の偏愛的な知識や世界観が売りのマンガ、つまりコミックビームを置き換えるAIは半永久に出てこないと思います。読もうコミックビーム！

ちびデリダ・ちびスピコ #tonesphere #starbirth

YbeLLいい透明感ボイスしてると思いません？思いませんか……

【アップデート予告】 1月16日のアップデートでは、音楽ゲーム「CytusⅡ」とのコラボとして3曲がさらに追加されます！ @CytusRayark 追加される楽曲は： ・「Alb」by Avans @AvansDTM ・「Incyde」by YbeLL @naclbbr ・「彩」by MisoilePunch♪ @MisoilePunch #Phigros #Pigeon_Games

happy birthday🍅 #tonesphere_art

本人がまた1歩大人になりました。 半熟トマトですが来年もよろしくお願いします #tonesphere #starbirth

微 　熱 　　出 　た 。 （誕生日はちゃんとなにかでます）