Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bernardo Sacchini
3.3K posts

Bernardo Sacchini
@nanosacchini
Desarrollo Inmobiliario, Finanzas y Economia. RE Development, Finance and Economics. Alma mater: UCAB & MIT
Katılım Aralık 2010
481 Takip Edilen989 Takipçiler

@Jmfariasu No he conseguido lugar en ccs que midan Lpa. Tienes alguno? ApoB si lo miden en la mayoría de los lados.
Ya revisaste el Cleerly test?
Español

@elonmusk Your analysis is probably flawed by assumming that every democrat will still be a democrat in the future. If the US policy by Democrats will eventually threaten the US economy, to the point of socialism, there is a high chance there will be many democrats turning Republicans
English

Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election. Far from being a threat to democracy, he is the only way to save it!
Let me explain: if even 1 in 20 illegals become citizens per year, something that the Democrats are expediting as fast as humanly possible, that would be about 2 million new legal voters in 4 years.
The voting margin in the swing states is often less than 20 thousand votes. That means if the “Democratic” Party succeeds, there will be no more swing states!!
Moreover, the Biden/Harris administration has been flying “asylum seekers”, who are fast-tracked to citizenship, directly into swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Arizona. It is a surefire way to win every election.
America then becomes a one-party state and Democracy is over. The only “elections” will be the Democratic Party primaries. This already happened in California many years ago, following the 1986 amnesty.
The only thing holding California back from extreme socialism and suffocating government policies is that people can leave California and still remain in America. Once the whole country is controlled by one party, there will be no escape.
Everywhere in America will be like the nightmare that is downtown San Francisco.
@amuse@amuse
@BasedMikeLee All according to plan. Guess how many migrants are eligible for naturalization under the current rules? 9 million…
English

@juanapitz Próximo año trato de organizarme mejor y acompañarte! Abrazo pana
Español

@Jonathan_Keith2 Don’t get me wrong , I think your analyses are very complete. That’s exactly why I’m asking and probing. Want to understand what you see that I don’t.
English

@Jonathan_Keith2 Ok. But mgt stated that core assets are 95+% occupied, with + spreads and in retail w sales/sf amongst the top in the country. So those metrics don’t seem trending in wrong direction, that’s why mgt might say RE fmtals good, while credit fmtals might have temporally deteriorated
English

@pobremillenial Que mala recomendación para el 99% de las personas.
Español

@Jonathan_Keith2 Agreed w you here! Better disclosure would be ideal for the informed investors.
I think however that the reasons management can have for been careful about disclosures in PUBLIC markets can be others than only dishonesty. EG: to reduce ST pressures that are counter to LT goals
English

@nanosacchini A good report from management would be an honest appraisal of the business. We are not given that.
English

@Jonathan_Keith2 What would other parts of equation be?
1-Rates (which affect DSCR), 2-fixed v float, 3-leverage.
1: seems unlikely they go up again, and v unlikely they go up by as much as LY
2/3: absent recklessness, unlikely they’ll continue to increase risk here
Am I missing something?
English

@nanosacchini Why do you think credit fundamentals can only deteriorate one time? I know management has a line to that effect, if that's what you are referring to, but rates are one part of the equation.
English

@Jonathan_Keith2 However the deterioration in credit fundamentals happens one time (assuming all else equal), vs the increases in RE fundamentals can be sustained and can eventually catch up. BN would need to have the wherewithal to wait for the catch up.
English

@Jonathan_Keith2 Interesting. Can’t they both coexist? For example, RE fundamentals can be increasing at a 7% clip, but credit fundamentals can be down, dependent on how much debt was float vs fixed, given interest rate increased by way more than RE fundamentals.
English

@ardensurquiola Promotores es lo que he visto y me han comentado. No se si particulares
Español

@nanosacchini Me estas hablando de constructoras o de particulares?
Constructoras si he visto que estan dando 36 meses, me parece genial
Español

@ardensurquiola Tenemos 1.5 a 2 años dando financiamiento desde 18-60 meses. Dependiendo del producto con o sin intereses.Ha ayudado a mover inventario. No se si fuimos los 1eros en dar este paso, pero si de los 1eros. El mercado se ha ido ajustando y ya hay más propietarios dando financiamiento
Español

@IrrationalMrkts Really thinking about durability and endurance of the company and the product/service it sells.
English

@ardensurquiola Impuestos es otra, quizá la más importante
Español

@juanapitz Si tienes más quarterlies de Alta Fox mandalos, el último que conseguí fue Q3 o Q4 2022.
Pulad está invirtiendo con Nalanda desde 2008. Muy muy resonante su estrategia (la describe en el libro)
Español

@nanosacchini Leo bastante seguido los quarterly de Alta Fox. Tremendamente buenos.
Este último de Prasad es reciente, ¿no? ¿De qué va?
Manhattan, NY 🇺🇸 Español

@juanapitz Buena lista!
Pulak Prasad - Nalanda Capital. Tiene poca información disponible, un buen libro: What I learned about investing from Darwin
Connor Haley - Alta Fox. Poca info tambien, aunque tiene algunos research reports buenos.
Español

@juanapitz Está en la lista. Predators Ball es muy bueno también, la historia de mullen y como creo el mercado de JB que dio pie a los raiders
Español











