Sabitlenmiş Tweet
natafurbosa
5.5K posts

natafurbosa
@nat4casb
new year new me### raritos no me sigan. i LOVE mancheste!!!! i block you = you ate my pussy
Katılım Ağustos 2025
354 Takip Edilen55 Takipçiler

natafurbosa retweetledi

@Master_Morrdred @doxmedont ??????? Whatever that fucking means??????
English

@nat4casb @doxmedont I would give my life to protect any woman, even you. If that's misogynistic so be it.
English

@Master_Morrdred @MO_Catholic @doxmedont So you just focused on the retard part instead of actually.. debating. You can just say you don’t have arguments.. it’s not illegal, you know?
English

@nat4casb @MO_Catholic @doxmedont Yeah don't insult me thanks, you obviously don't have the intelligence for this kind of topic. Bye 🥱
English
natafurbosa retweetledi

@Master_Morrdred @MO_Catholic @doxmedont Are you retarded? Comparing wives to children isn’t the argument you think it is… it actually makes it worse. Marriage is between equals, not a parent-child dynamic. If obedience is your framework, then yeah people are going to call it what it looks like
GIF
English

@nat4casb @MO_Catholic @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu Your problem seems to be authority, so just say that. Children obeying their parents is not anti-children is it?
English

@nyanqueer_wren @yourlonggrift those aren’t men??? gosh how mononeuronal are you
English

@nat4casb @yourlonggrift YOU'RE the one being lesbophobic by invalidating butch/genderqueer/etc. lesbians.

English

@Master_Morrdred @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu That’s literally the definition of a hierarchy, you’re just calling it ‘virtue’ instead of what it is. But it’s fine, you have already demonstrated how misogynistic you are.
English

@nat4casb @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu That brings us back to the unclear concept of "anti-women" and to twitter arguments. There are countless female Saints so no, we don't consider women inferior. Still, they should obey their husbands, AND the husbands should be virtuous...
English

@MO_Catholic @Master_Morrdred @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu Oh okay. Just obey, stay silent, don’t teach, submit to your husband… but don’t worry, it’s all ‘in the name of love’ so it’s totally fine. Totally not a man-made system where men write the rules, give themselves authority, and then call it divine order when women question it.
English

@nat4casb @Master_Morrdred @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu This isn’t an “anti-women message”, it’s part of St. Paul’s description of proper roles in a Christian marriage. I encourage you to read this verse, which immediately follows the one you quoted.

English

@nyanqueer_wren @yourlonggrift ??????????? lesbophobes are not real
English

@nyanqueer_wren @yourlonggrift exclusionism is when i don’t want men in my lesbian label
English

@yourlonggrift Literally why gaf. Exclusionism and separatism do SO MUCH more harm than good. You're not getting people to change by attacking the queerness that's ingrained into them. Y'all are just coming across as complete assholes.
English
natafurbosa retweetledi
natafurbosa retweetledi

@Master_Morrdred @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu wives must submit to their husbands (Ephesians 5:22–24)
men rule over women (Genesis 3:16)
a rape victim has to marry her rapist (Deuteronomy 22:28–29)
If this is ‘not about inferiority,’ then why is authority consistently male and submission consistently female?
GIF
English

@Master_Morrdred @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu ‘Submitting isn’t anti-anything’ only works if both people actually have equal power to begin with. In your own structure, men lead and women follow, so calling it ‘love’ doesn’t change the hierarchy, it just softens how it sounds 🙄
English

@Master_Morrdred @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu And saying ‘the Bible is about love’ doesn’t erase the parts where women are told to be silent or submit. You don’t get to ignore those and then act like people are misreading it. And this is clearly man-made, let’s not act dense.
English

@nat4casb @doxmedont @jusletmead0reu 1 - I'm talking about the George Carlin joke
2 - I'm not debating the initial claim nor yours, because the concept of "anti-women" is vague, that's typical useless twitter argument
English









