Ndr

Kılıçdaroğlu CHP’sinin alacağı oy %1,5. O da olandan bitenden haberi olmayan, kafası karışan seçmen. Türkiye’de toplamda 100.000 kılıçdar destekçisi yoktur. Özgür Özel ve İmamoğlu neredeyse CHP orası olur. Bina, logo vs. boş iş.

Bugün bir milattır. Bugünün öncesi vardır. Sonrası olacaktır…

Selective ICJ citations do not overturn modern maritime law. Under UNCLOS Article 121, islands generate continental shelf and EEZ rights. This is not a "Greek interpretation.” It is the globally accepted legal framework recognized by more than 160 states. The cases Turkey frequently cites were highly specific exceptions, not universal rules. UK-France did not deny islands maritime rights. Libya-Malta did not abolish island entitlements. Romania-Ukraine concerned Snake Island, a tiny isolated rock, not large inhabited islands like Crete or Rhodes. Eritrea-Yemen involved unique Red Sea circumstances after conflict. None of these rulings established the principle that major inhabited islands lose maritime rights simply because they lie close to another state’s mainland. International courts consistently recognize that islands generate maritime zones. The real issue is how overlapping claims are adjusted equitably, not whether islands possess rights in the first place. Turkey’s argument attempts to turn “equity” into a tool for overriding treaty law itself. But equity does not mean geography alone decides everything, nor does it mean larger continental states automatically prevail over islands. If that logic were accepted globally, countless island and archipelagic states would see their maritime rights severely weakened, destabilizing the entire UNCLOS system. This dispute is ultimately about whether international law remains treaty-based and universal, or becomes selectively reinterpreted according to geopolitical interests. -Greek Report

Some ICJ decisions. UK-France(1977/2011):The court emphasized that it is "unequitable" for islands located opposite the coast of a mainland to unjustly cut off the natural extension of the mainland, and that islands should not create a boundary-disrupting effect in delimitation.

❌Illegal unilateral Turkish maritime claims inconsistent with international law do not create legal rights and have no legal effect. ❌ Turkey cannot claim to be a ‘persistent objector’ to UNCLOS for the simple reason that it has accepted and benefitted by other UNCLOS provisions in the Black Sea & the Mediterranean. Under the persistent objector doctrine, a state must reject an emerging customary rule consistently, unequivocally, and continuously from the outset in order to avoid being bound by it. ✅ Greek islands retain their full maritime entitlements under customary law, Illegal Turkish claims cannot override them.

DEM Parti Milletvekili Beritan Güneş: "Doğu'da sırf insanlar Kürt diye trafik cezası yazılıyor"

Akademisyen Emrah Gülsunar'ın PKK'yı aklayan skandal paylaşımları ortaya çıktı: "Türk Mukavemet Teşkilatı neyse, PKK odur."