Nathan Eric Dickman

12.9K posts

Nathan Eric Dickman banner
Nathan Eric Dickman

Nathan Eric Dickman

@nericdickman

philosophy & religions | hermeneutics & phenomenology | pedagogy & equity | using questions to think (2021) | what are views? | he

Katılım Aralık 2018
1.7K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Nathan Eric Dickman
Nathan Eric Dickman@nericdickman·
We feel as if we had to repair a torn spider's web with our fingers. ~Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, §106
English
0
1
1
80
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
This is stunning: it looks like Iran degraded American military bases into unusability across an entire theater, simultaneously. As far as I know, no other U.S. adversary has achieved that, ever. This is directly reported in the NYT (nytimes.com/2026/03/25/us/…): they write that Iran has rendered "many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops [...] all but uninhabitable." As the article describes, "there were close to 40,000 U.S. troops in the region when the war started, and Central Command has dispersed thousands of them, some to as far away as Europe." Those troops that do remain are "not on their original bases" but have been "relocated to hotels and office spaces throughout the region." Genuinely incredible.
Arnaud Bertrand tweet media
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand

I don't think people realize just how extraordinary what we're witnessing with Iran is. I was arguing with a dear journalist friend of mine yesterday who was telling me that Iran was winning, yes, but only on the strategic level, not tactically. The type of thing a skinny kid getting stuffed in lockers in highschool tells himself to make himself feel better: "These people will BEG to work for me in ten years. Everyone knows jocks peak in highschool. They'll literally beg." 😏 I think that's precisely wrong, and that's what makes the Iran war different. As of now, Iran is in fact holding its own tactically too. Think about other U.S. wars of aggression these past few decades. Take Vietnam, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Serbia, etc. (the list is unfortunately very long). The pattern was roughly always the same with an immense power differential between aggressor and victim. These wars were, by and large, imperial: the empire attempting to crush a much weaker people whose only realistic recourse was guerrilla resistance. And that is when they actually had the will to resist: some - like Libya - barely even bothered, just resigning themselves to their fate (despite being, at the time, the richest country in Africa). As spectators of these wars, if you had any moral sense, the dominant emotion was a kind of helpless disgust: you were watching a giant stomp through someone else's house. Sure, the U.S. actually lost many - if not most - of these wars, famously replacing the Taliban with the Taliban or being expelled with their tail between their legs from Vietnam, but the power differential was no less real for it. It's just that power doesn't always guarantee victory: sometimes the giant can't kill everyone, and eventually tires of trying. But the “victories” won this way were always pyrrhic at best: the people endured, yes, but what they were left with was a country in ashes that takes decades to rebuild. Meanwhile, in the grand scheme of things, the giant walked away with little more than a bruised ego. Iran is - remarkably - proving to be an entirely different beast: when others were merely surviving a giant, Iran appears to be able to compete with one. What just happened over the past 48 hours is the best illustration of this. You had the President of the United States issue a formal ultimatum: reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or we "obliterate" your power grid. Iran's response was essentially: we dare you, if you do this we'll make all your Gulf allies uninhabitable within a week. And, as we saw, Trump backed down: pretexting non-existent "VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS" with Iran, he said his ultimatum no-longer applied (or, rather, became 5 days). Adding he now envisaged the Strait of Hormuz being “jointly controlled by me and the Ayatollah.” To the amusement of Iran’s diplomacy (x.com/IraninSA/statu…). That, folks, is a textbook tactical victory. It is, remarkably, Iran demonstrating in this instance that it had escalation dominance over the United States of America. That is, the ability to credibly threaten consequences so severe that the US - for perhaps the first time since the Cold War - found it preferable to stand down. That's no skinny kid being locked in a locker dreaming of revenge fantasies. That's the kid grabbing the bully's wrist mid-shove and watching his face change. And it's not the only tactical victory in this war so far. Take the episode over the Israeli attack on Iran's South Pars gas facility. Iran had warned that if that happened U.S. allies in the region - including Israel - would face a symmetrical response. And they delivered: famously devastating Qatar's Ras Laffan facility - which produced roughly 20% of global LNG supply - and leading, according to Qatar themselves, to a $20 billion loss of annual revenue for the next 5 years (oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-…). Not only that but they also managed to hit Israel's Haifa refinery (aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/19…), one of the country's most strategic and protected sites. The result was Trump distancing himself from the South Pars attack, saying that Israel had "violently lashed out" unilaterally and that "NO MORE ATTACKS WILL BE MADE BY ISRAEL pertaining to this extremely important and valuable South Pars Field." Israel then said it wouldn't strike Iran energy sites anymore (bloomberg.com/news/articles/…). From where I stand, that's another tactical victory. It is, at least, Iran demonstrating that is can fight back **symmetrically** against the U.S. and its allies. Not through asymmetric resistance with IEDs hidden in the roadside or traps hidden in the jungle, but eye for eye, and against some of the most heavily protected sites on the U.S.'s side. That's qualitatively different from any other adversaries the U.S. has directly fought in recent wars. There's plenty more, such as the pretty relevant fact that Iran has gained control of the single most strategic energy chokepoint on earth and the U.S. is finding it impossible to break that control. To the point where Trump has been reduced to publicly begging China - of all countries - for help, which given Trump's ego mustn't have been easy to do. Only to be told no. By China. And by everyone else he asked. This is the topic of my latest article: how this is, in fact, the first genuine "multipolar war." First, in the narrow sense: because Iran is revealing itself to be a genuine pole of power - not a superpower, but an actor that cannot be submitted, which is all multipolarity is. And second, because the war itself is accelerating multipolarity everywhere else: the U.S. has never been more isolated, never looked weaker and its security guarantees have never been more hollow. In my article I lay out the full scoreboard - military, economic, political - and explain why this war has already changed the world, regardless of how it ends. Enjoy the read here: open.substack.com/pub/arnaudbert…

English
135
1.4K
4.2K
212.8K
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
Alan MacLeod
Alan MacLeod@AlanRMacLeod·
BREAKING: The United Nations has voted 123-3 in favor to condemn the enslavement of millions of Africans and the trans-Atlantic slave trade. The three countries voting against it? 🇺🇸 USA 🇮🇱Israel 🇦🇷 Argentina Nearly all of Europe abstained.
Alan MacLeod tweet media
English
4.7K
23.5K
76K
4.5M
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
Luke Gromen
Luke Gromen@LukeGromen·
“Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage.” -NYT just now First MSM admission I’ve seen of this fact
English
230
2K
8.9K
569.3K
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
du côté de chez rob
du côté de chez rob@ragandboneshop·
my biggest conspiracy theory is that these disreputable free “detectors” are not just ads for “humanizer” tools, but also false flag operations run by AI corps to sow confusion: “if even a machine can’t tell, you certainly can’t; ergo, you must accept our bots’ prose.”
Benji@WrnrWrites

To confirm, this “100% AI generated” passage is the opening of chapter 5 from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

English
20
158
1K
19.2K
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
الكسندرا ميراي
الكسندرا ميراي@LexiAIexander·
Takes 10 paragraphs to get to this: "police had arrested a man named Ori Solomon, a 55-year-old Israeli citizen...investigators found a cache of weapons and arrested Solomon on federal weapons charges"
Los Angeles Times@latimes

What began as a routine check triggered by a persistent odor led to an unsettling discovery: a hidden lab operating inside a California warehouse containing dangerous pathogens including HIV, malaria, COVID-19 and Ebola. latimes.com/california/sto…

English
43
2.8K
8.8K
209.3K
Nathan Eric Dickman
Nathan Eric Dickman@nericdickman·
I wish those Iran Lego videos were not AI. I like the Iran/Denmark mashup, but AI is irredeemable.
English
0
0
0
31
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
Alan MacLeod
Alan MacLeod@AlanRMacLeod·
"Man in military fatigues" is a new one.
Alan MacLeod tweet media
English
527
29.4K
137.4K
1.4M
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
Assal Rad
Assal Rad@AssalRad·
NYT finally got a community note for its whitewashing language.
Assal Rad tweet media
English
160
18.2K
106.7K
833.4K
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
☀️👀
☀️👀@zei_squirrel·
NYT now casually admitting the CIA/Mossad have been doing ops to try to collapse the Iranian state. This is the project that the Western media and political class, including its pseudo-radical variants like Owen Jones and Yanis Varoufakis, launder as a "heroic organic revolution"
☀️👀 tweet media
English
61
2.9K
7.7K
107.5K
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
Ilhan Niaz
Ilhan Niaz@IlhanNiaz·
“Cognitive Surrender” - a new study argues that use of AI leads to suspension of human reasoning, not its augmentation. The implication being that over time people will lose their reasoning ability & use AI as its substitute. Download the paper for free here, excerpts & reference below: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… ——- “As people increasingly integrate AI into their decision-making processes, they interact and engage with a cognitive system that can reshape the functions of both intuition and deliberation. For example, System 3 can replace System 1 by offering confident, ready-made answers that preempt the need for intuitive reasoning.” (page 15 of pdf) “As AI systems increasingly participate in human cognition, a new phenomenon emerges that cannot be explained by traditional concepts such as cognitive offloading or automation bias alone. We define cognitive surrender as the behavioral and motivational tendency to defer judgment, effort, and responsibility to System 3’s output, particularly when that output is delivered fluently, confidently, or with minimal friction. Unlike cognitive offloading, which is typically strategic and task-specific (e.g., using GPS to navigate), cognitive surrender entails a deeper transfer of agency.” (Page 17) “Access to System 3 outputs significantly influenced accuracy, increasing correct answers when AI was correct, and decreasing accuracy when incorrect. Access to System 3 made decision-makers more confident, despite approximately half of System 3 outputs being incorrect. Finally, users who trust AI more and have lower NFC and fluid IQ were more likely to display cognitive surrender. Whether System 3 was accurate or faulty, its presence displaced internal reasoning.” (Page 27) “Cognitive surrender was robust across studies.” (Page 42) “Across our studies, we observe that when System 3 was available, people readily engaged it and frequently adopted its answers. This shift reflects a reallocation of cognitive control rather than mere effort saving. System 3’s fluent, confident outputs are treated as epistemically authoritative, lowering the threshold for scrutiny and attenuating the metacognitive signals that would ordinarily route a response to deliberation. In the case of cognitive surrender, there is a shift in the locus of control, with an external system (System 3) occupying the default position.” (Page 45) “Time constraints clarify why surrender arises so readily, while incentives and feedback show that surrender is malleable. When decision time is scarce, the internal monitor detecting conflict and recruiting deliberation is less likely to trigger. Hence, the low-friction path to defer to external cognition becomes attractive.” (Page 46) “Tri-System Theory is not a warning about AI’s dangers but a recognition of System 3’s psychological presence. We do not merely use AI; we think with it. In doing so, we must ask new questions: What happens when our judgments are shaped by minds not our own? What becomes of intuition and effort when a generative, artificial partner stands ready to answer? How do we preserve agency, reflection, and autonomy in a world where users engage in cognitive surrender?”
Ilhan Niaz tweet mediaIlhan Niaz tweet media
English
26
341
863
58.8K
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
The Hasbara Buster
The Hasbara Buster@ibrahimibnyusuf·
Palestinian life is cheap. In the videos below we see: 1⃣An Israeli soldier just shooting a Palestinian man dead at a checkpoint for no reason at all. 2⃣An Israeli soldier just shooting a Palestinian teenager dead on the street for no reason at all. 3⃣A Jewish settler just shooting a Palestinian activist dead for no reason at all. In this case we have two videos, one taken by a third person and the other filmed by the victim himself; he can be heard uttering harrowing sounds of agony as the scene blacks out when the device he was using to record the events falls to the ground. The casualness, the coldness, the callousness with which these Israelis take Palestinian lives — the lives of people who have done absolutely nothing to them — is blood curdling. Israel is a nation that has lost its soul — if it ever had one in the first place.
English
19
593
915
15.1K
Nathan Eric Dickman retweetledi
Don’t Boo…Revolt!
Don’t Boo…Revolt!@BreeNewsome·
“The problem is Netanyahu”, “The problem is DC”… No, the problem is the existence of the Israeli colony
English
4
76
376
4.8K